This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TO0130
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2022.#Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL – Earlier EU word mark Traumeel – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-130/22.
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2022.
Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL – Earlier EU word mark Traumeel – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-130/22.
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2022.
Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL – Earlier EU word mark Traumeel – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-130/22.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:574