Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022TN0699

    Case T-699/22: Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Seamist v Commission

    OJ C 24, 23.1.2023, p. 55–55 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    23.1.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 24/55


    Action brought on 12 November 2022 — Seamist v Commission

    (Case T-699/22)

    (2023/C 24/76)

    Language of the case: Portuguese

    Parties

    Applicant: Seamist, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário and S. Soares, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the General Court should:

    annul Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for Zona Franca da Madeira (ZFM) — Regime III;

    order the Commission to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law that are, essentially, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-553/22, Thorn Investments v Commission.


    Top