This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TJ0005
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 March 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a band with an acute angle – Earlier EU and national figurative marks representing a band – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-5/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 March 2023.
Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a band with an acute angle – Earlier EU and national figurative marks representing a band – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.
Case T-5/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 March 2023.
Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a band with an acute angle – Earlier EU and national figurative marks representing a band – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.
Case T-5/22.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:150