This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CN0429
Case C-429/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgerichts Wien (Austria) lodged on 28 June 2022 — VK v N1 Interactive Ltd.
Case C-429/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgerichts Wien (Austria) lodged on 28 June 2022 — VK v N1 Interactive Ltd.
Case C-429/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgerichts Wien (Austria) lodged on 28 June 2022 — VK v N1 Interactive Ltd.
OJ C 451, 28.11.2022, p. 8–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.11.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 451/8 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgerichts Wien (Austria) lodged on 28 June 2022 — VK v N1 Interactive Ltd.
(Case C-429/22)
(2022/C 451/11)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Oberlandesgericht Wien
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: VK
Defendant: N1 Interactive Ltd.
Question referred
Is Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (1) on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (‘the Rome I Regulation’) to be interpreted as meaning that the law of the country in which the consumer has his or her habitual residence is not applicable if the law applicable under Article 4 of the Rome I Regulation, the application of which the applicant seeks and which would be applicable if the applicant lacked consumer status, is more favourable to the applicant?
(1) Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (OJ 2008 L 177, p. 6).