This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CN0383
Case C-383/22 P: Appeal brought on 9 June 2022 by SFD S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 30 March 2022 in Case T-35/21, SFD v EUIPO — Allmax Nutrition (ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION)
Case C-383/22 P: Appeal brought on 9 June 2022 by SFD S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 30 March 2022 in Case T-35/21, SFD v EUIPO — Allmax Nutrition (ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION)
Case C-383/22 P: Appeal brought on 9 June 2022 by SFD S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 30 March 2022 in Case T-35/21, SFD v EUIPO — Allmax Nutrition (ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION)
OJ C 451, 28.11.2022, p. 7–7
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.11.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 451/7 |
Appeal brought on 9 June 2022 by SFD S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 30 March 2022 in Case T-35/21, SFD v EUIPO — Allmax Nutrition (ALLNUTRITION DESIGNED FOR MOTIVATION)
(Case C-383/22 P)
(2022/C 451/09)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: SFD S.A. (represented by: T. Grucelski, adwokat)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 17 October 2022, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that SFD S.A. should bear its own costs.