This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0817
Case T-817/17: Action brought on 14 December 2017 — Schokker v EASA
Case T-817/17: Action brought on 14 December 2017 — Schokker v EASA
Case T-817/17: Action brought on 14 December 2017 — Schokker v EASA
OJ C 63, 19.2.2018, p. 16–16
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
19.2.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 63/16 |
Action brought on 14 December 2017 — Schokker v EASA
(Case T-817/17)
(2018/C 063/21)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Boudewijn Schokker (Hoofddorp, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Aviation Safety Agency
Form of order sought
— |
Declare and rule:
|
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, seeking to establish that EASA’s authority empowered to conclude contracts (‘the AECC’) committed a number of administrative errors.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging that the AECC made an unlawful offer of employment to the applicant which, due to that fact, he was unable to accept unconditionally. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that the AECC refused to correct that offer of employment, despite the fact that it was manifestly vitiated by illegality. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging that the abrupt withdrawal of the offer of employment by the AECC resulted in the definitive closure of the procedure to recruit the applicant. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging that the AECC failed to have regard to the purpose of the pre-litigation procedure by systematically frustrating all proposals for an out-of-court resolution to the dispute. |