This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32024R2822
Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002 (Text with EEA relevance)
Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002 (Text with EEA relevance)
Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002 (Text with EEA relevance)
PE/96/2023/REV/1
OJ L, 2024/2822, 18.11.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2822/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Date of entry into force unknown (pending notification) or not yet in force., Date of effect: 08/12/2024
Official Journal |
EN L series |
2024/2822 |
18.11.2024 |
REGULATION (EU) 2024/2822 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 23 October 2024
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 118, first paragraph, thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),
After consulting the Committee of the Regions,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (2),
Whereas:
(1) |
Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 (3) created a system of design protection specific to the European Community which has since then provided for the protection of designs at Union level in parallel to the protection of designs available at national level in Member States in accordance with their national law on design protection, harmonised pursuant to Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (4). |
(2) |
In line with its Communication of 19 May 2015 entitled ‘Better Regulation for better results – An EU agenda’ and its commitment to review Union policies regularly, the Commission carried out an extensive evaluation of the design protection systems in the Union, involving a comprehensive economic and legal assessment, supported by a series of studies. |
(3) |
In its conclusions of 10 November 2020 on intellectual property policy and the revision of the industrial design system in the Union, the Council called on the Commission to present proposals for the revision of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Directive 98/71/EC. The revision was requested to modernise the protection systems relating to industrial designs in the Union and to make design protection more attractive for individual designers and businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). |
(4) |
Since the establishment of the Community design system, experience has shown that individual designers and undertakings from within the Union and from third countries have accepted the system and it has become a successful and viable complement or alternative to the protection of designs at the national level of the Member States. |
(5) |
In its resolution of 11 November 2021 on an intellectual property action plan to support the EU’s recovery and resilience (5), the European Parliament pointed out that the current EU design protection system was set up 20 years ago and should be revised, highlighting the need to update it in order to ensure greater legal certainty, thus echoing the call of the Council to present proposals for the revision of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Directive 98/71/EC. |
(6) |
National design protection systems continue nevertheless to be necessary for those individual designers and undertakings that do not want protection of their designs at Union level, or are unable to obtain Union-wide protection, even though they do not face any obstacles for obtaining national protection. It should be left to each person seeking design protection to decide what kind of protection they wish to obtain, be it a national design right in one or more Member States, an EU design only, or both. |
(7) |
While its evaluation of the Union’s legislation on design protection confirmed that it is still largely fit for purpose, the Commission announced in its communication of 25 November 2020 entitled ‘Making the most of the EU’s innovative potential – An intellectual property action plan to support the EU’s recovery and resilience’ that, following the successful reform of the EU trade mark legislation, it would revise the Union legislation on design protection with a view to simplifying the system and making it more accessible and efficient, and with a view to updating the regulatory framework in light of developments in relation to new technologies on the market. |
(8) |
In parallel with the improvements and amendments to the EU design system, national design laws and practices should be further harmonised and brought into line with the EU design system to the extent appropriate, in order to create, as far as possible, equal conditions for the registration and protection of designs throughout the Union. This should be complemented by further efforts of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (the ‘Office’), the central industrial property offices of the Member States and the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property to promote convergence of practices and tools in the field of designs under the cooperation framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6). |
(9) |
It is necessary to adapt the terms used in Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 to the amendments introduced in the founding Treaties by the Treaty of Lisbon. This entails the replacement of ‘Community design’ by ‘European Union design’ (‘EU design’). In addition, the terms used in Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 need to be aligned with those of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001. This involves in particular the replacement of the name ‘Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs)’ by ‘European Union Intellectual Property Office’. |
(10) |
As a complement to the administration of the EU design system, it is essential that the Office adequately promote that system with a view to raising awareness and improving understanding of the possibility, value and benefits of obtaining and using design protection at Union level. |
(11) |
Since the establishment of the Community design system, the rise of information technology has entailed the advent of new designs which are not embodied in physical products. That calls for a broadening of the definition of products eligible for design protection to clearly cover those embodied in a physical object, or visualised in a graphic, or that are apparent from the spatial arrangement of items intended to form an interior or exterior environment. In this context, it should be recognised that animation, such as movement or transition, of the features of a product can contribute to the appearance of designs, in particular designs that are not embodied in a physical object. |
(12) |
In order to ensure legal certainty, it is appropriate to clarify that protection is conferred upon the right holder, by way of registration of an EU design, for those design features of a product, in whole or in part, which are shown visibly in an application for registration of such design and made available to the public by way of publication. |
(13) |
Apart from being shown visibly in an application for registration of an EU design, design features of a product do not need to be visible at any particular time or in any particular situation of use in order to benefit from design protection. An exception to that principle applies to the design protection of component parts of a complex product that need to remain visible during normal use of that product. |
(14) |
In view of the growing deployment of 3D printing technologies in different areas of industry, including with the help of artificial intelligence, as well as the resulting challenges for design right holders to effectively prevent illegitimate copying of their protected designs, it is appropriate to provide that the creation, downloading, copying and making available of any medium or software which records the design for the purpose of reproduction of a product that infringes the protected design, constitutes use of the design which should be subject to the right holder’s authorisation. |
(15) |
In order to ensure design protection and combat counterfeiting effectively, and in line with international obligations of the Union under the framework of the World Trade Organization (WTO), in particular Article V to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT 1947) on freedom of transit, and, as regards generic medicines, the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, adopted by the WTO Ministerial Conference on 14 November 2001, the holder of a registered EU design should be entitled to prevent third parties from bringing products, in the course of trade, from third countries into the Union, without being released for free circulation there, where, without right holder’s authorisation, such products incorporate a design which is identical or essentially identical to the registered EU design or where a design is applied to those products which is identical or essentially identical to the registered EU design. |
(16) |
To that end, it should be permissible for holders of registered EU designs to prevent the entry of infringing products and the placement of such products in all customs situations, also when such products are not intended to be placed on the market of the Union. In performing customs controls, the customs authorities should make use of the powers and procedures laid down in Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7), including at the request of the right holders. In particular, the customs authorities should carry out the relevant controls on the basis of risk analysis criteria. |
(17) |
In order to reconcile the need to ensure the effective enforcement of design rights with the necessity to avoid hampering the free flow of trade in legitimate products, the entitlement of the holder of the registered EU design should lapse where, during proceedings initiated before the European Union design court (‘EU design court’) that is competent to take a substantive decision on whether the EU design has been infringed, the declarant or the holder of the products is able to prove that the holder of the registered EU design is not entitled to prohibit the placing of the products on the market in the country of final destination. |
(18) |
The exclusive rights conferred by a registered EU design should be subject to an appropriate set of limitations. Apart from acts carried out privately and for non-commercial purposes and those carried out for experimental purposes, permissible use should include acts of reproduction for the purpose of making citations or acts of teaching, referential use in the context of comparative advertising, and use for the purpose of comment, critique or parody, provided that those acts are compatible with fair trade practices and do not unduly prejudice the normal exploitation of the design. Use of a registered EU design by third parties for the purpose of artistic expression should be considered to be fair as long as it is in accordance with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters. Furthermore, the rules on EU designs should be applied in a way that ensures full respect of fundamental rights and freedoms, in particular the freedom of expression. |
(19) |
Directive (EU) 2024/2823 of the European Parliament and of the Council (8) harmonises the laws of Member States as regards the use of protected designs for the purpose of permitting the repair of a complex product so as to restore its original appearance, where the design is applied to or incorporated in a product which constitutes a component part of a complex product upon whose appearance the protected design of the component part is dependent. Accordingly, the current transitional repair clause contained in Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 should become a permanent provision. As the intended effect of that repair clause is to make registered and unregistered EU design rights unenforceable where the design of the component part of a complex product is used for the purpose of the repair of a complex product so as to restore its original appearance, the repair clause should be one of the defences to EU design right infringement under Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. Furthermore, for the sake of coherence with the repair clause in Directive (EU) 2024/2823, and in order to ensure that the scope of design protection is only restricted to prevent design right holders from actually being granted product monopolies, it is necessary to explicitly limit the application of the repair clause set out in Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 to component parts of a complex product upon whose appearance the protected design is dependent. In addition, in order to ensure that consumers are not mislead and are able to make an informed decision between competing products that can be used for the repair, it should be explicitly provided for that the repair clause cannot be invoked by a manufacturer or seller of a component part who has failed to duly inform consumers about the commercial origin, and the identity of the manufacturer, of the product to be used for the purpose of repair of the complex product. That detailed information should be provided through a clear and visible indication on the product or, where that is not possible, on its packaging or in a document accompanying the product, and should include at least the trade mark under which the product is marketed, and the name of the manufacturer. |
(20) |
With a view to preserving the effectiveness of the liberalisation of the spare parts aftermarket sought by this Regulation and in line with the case law (9) of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in order to be able to benefit from the repair clause exemption from design protection, the manufacturer or seller of a component part of a complex product is under a duty of diligence to ensure, through appropriate means, in particular contractual means, that downstream users do not intend to use the component parts at issue for purposes other than that of repair so as to restore the original appearance of the complex product. This however should not require the manufacturer or seller of a component part of a complex product to guarantee, objectively and in all circumstances, that the parts they make or sell are, ultimately, actually used by end users for the sole purpose of repair so as to restore the original appearance of that complex product. |
(21) |
In order to facilitate the marketing of design-protected products, in particular by SMEs and individual designers, and to increase awareness of the design registration regimes existing both at Union and national level, a commonly accepted notice consisting of the symbol should be available for use by design right holders and others with their consent. |
(22) |
In view of the insignificant number of applications for registered EU designs filed at the central industrial property offices of the Member States and the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property, and in order to align the system for applying for registered EU designs to the system set out in Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, it should only be possible to file an application for a registered EU design at the Office. In order to facilitate the provision of information and administrative guidance to applicants on the procedure for the registration of EU designs, it is appropriate that the Office and the central industrial property offices of the Member States and the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property cooperate with each other to that end under the cooperation framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 2017/1001. |
(23) |
Both technological advancement and the experience gained in the application of the current EU design registration system have revealed the need for improvement of certain aspects of procedure. Consequently, certain measures should be taken to update, simplify and speed up procedures, where appropriate, and to enhance legal certainty and predictability where necessary. |
(24) |
To this end, it is of key importance to provide the appropriate means to allow a clear and precise representation for all designs, which is adaptable to technical advances in relation to the visualisation of designs and the needs of the Union industry. In order to ensure that the same graphic representation can be used for design applications in one or more Member States and for applications for registered EU designs, the Office, the central industrial property offices of the Member States and the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property should be required to cooperate with each other to establish common standards for the formal requirements that the representation has to fulfil. |
(25) |
For greater efficiency it is also appropriate to facilitate the filing of multiple applications for registered EU designs by allowing applicants to combine designs in one application without being subject to the condition that the products in which the designs are intended to be incorporated or to which they are intended to be applied all belong to the same class of the International Classification for Industrial Designs (‘Locarno Classification’) established by the Locarno Agreement (1968). However, a maximum limit should be provided for to avoid potential abuse of multiple filings. |
(26) |
For reasons of efficiency and to streamline proceedings, the means of notification and communication should be electronic only. Nevertheless, it is important that the Office provide appropriate technical guidance and assistance, both online and offline, in order to facilitate the use of electronic means and prevent digital divide. |
(27) |
Given the essential importance of the amounts of fees payable to the Office for the functioning of the EU design protection system and its complementary relationship as regards national design systems, and in order to align the legislative approach provided for in Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 with Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, it is appropriate to set those fee amounts directly in Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in an annex. The amounts of the fees should be fixed at a level which ensures both that the revenue they produce is in principle sufficient for the budget of the Office to be balanced and that EU design and the national design systems coexist and complement each other, taking into account, inter alia, the size of the market covered by the EU design and the needs of SMEs. |
(28) |
Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 confers powers on the Commission to adopt rules implementing that Regulation. As a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, the powers conferred upon the Commission under Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 need to be aligned with Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). |
(29) |
In order to ensure an effective, efficient and expeditious examination and registration of EU design applications by the Office using procedures which are transparent, thorough, fair and equitable, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 by specifying the details on the procedure for amending an application. |
(30) |
In order to ensure that a registered EU design can be declared invalid in an effective and efficient way by means of a transparent, thorough, fair and equitable procedure, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 by specifying the proceedings for declaring a registered EU design invalid. |
(31) |
In order to allow for an effective, efficient and complete review of decisions of the Office by the Boards of Appeal by means of a transparent, thorough, fair and equitable procedure, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 by specifying the details of appeal proceedings where proceedings relating to EU designs require derogations from the provisions set out in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 73 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001. |
(32) |
In order to ensure a smooth, effective and efficient operation of the EU design system, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 by specifying the requirements as to the details on oral proceedings and the detailed arrangements for taking of evidence, the detailed arrangements for notification, the means of communication and the forms to be used by the parties to proceedings, the rules governing the calculation and duration of time limits, the procedures for the revocation of a decision or for cancellation of an entry in the Register of EU designs, the detailed arrangements for the resumption of proceedings, and the details on representation before the Office. |
(33) |
In order to ensure an effective and efficient organisation of the Boards of Appeal, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to supplement Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 by specifying the details on the organisation of the Boards of Appeal where proceedings relating to EU designs require derogation from the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 168 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001. |
(34) |
It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making (10). In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. |
(35) |
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to specify the details concerning applications, requests, certificates, claims, regulations, notifications and any other document under the relevant procedural requirements established by Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, as well as to establish the maximum rates for costs essential to the proceedings and actually incurred, the details concerning publications in the European Union Designs Bulletin and the Official Journal of the Office, the detailed arrangements for exchange of information between the Office and national authorities, the detailed arrangements concerning translations of supporting documents in written proceedings, and exact types of decisions to be taken by a single member of the Invalidity Divisions. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (11). |
(36) |
Given the advanced harmonisation of copyright law in the Union, it is appropriate to adjust the principle of cumulation of protection under Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and under copyright law by allowing designs protected by EU design rights to be protected as copyright works, provided that the requirements of copyright law are met. |
(37) |
Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 should therefore be amended accordingly and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002 (12) should be repealed. |
(38) |
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 (13) should be amended by the Commission in order to align it with the amendments introduced by this Regulation to Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 regarding the terms to be used following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon and the terms used in Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the reference to rules concerning fees payable to the Office, the duration of time limits and the representation before the Office, as well as the inclusion of a number of rules initially contained in Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 in Regulation (EC) No 6/2002. The repeal of the empowerment that served as the basis for the adoption and revision of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 should be without prejudice to the maintaining in force of that Regulation until it is repealed. |
(39) |
Since the objectives of this Regulation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the autonomous nature of the EU design system being independent from national systems, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives. |
(40) |
The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (14), |
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 is amended as follows:
(1) |
the title is replaced by the following: ‘Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on European Union designs’ ; |
(2) |
in Article 1, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. A design which complies with the conditions contained in this Regulation is hereinafter referred to as a “European Union design” (“EU design”).’ |
(3) |
throughout the articles, the term ‘Community design’ is replaced by ‘EU design’ and any necessary grammatical changes are made; |
(4) |
throughout the articles, the term ‘Community design court’ is replaced by ‘EU design court’ and any necessary grammatical changes are made; |
(5) |
in Article 1(3), Article 7(1), Article 11(1), Article 22(1), Article 27(1), Article 96(1), Article 98(1) and (5), Article 106a(1) and (2), Article 106d(1) and (2), and Article 110a(1), the word ‘Community’ is replaced by ‘Union’ and any necessary grammatical changes are made; |
(6) |
in Article 25(1), point (a), Article 47(1) and Article 106e(1), the reference to ‘Article 3(a)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 3, point (1)’ and any necessary grammatical changes are made; |
(7) |
Article 2 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 2 European Union Intellectual Property Office The European Union Intellectual Property Office (“the Office”), established by Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*1), shall carry out the tasks entrusted to it by this Regulation. (*1) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (OJ L 154, 16.6.2017, p. 1).’;" |
(8) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 2a Capacity to act For the purpose of implementing this Regulation, companies or firms and other legal bodies shall be regarded as legal persons if, under the terms of the law governing them, they have the capacity in their own name to have rights and obligations of all kinds to make contracts or accomplish other legal acts, and to sue and be sued.’ |
(9) |
Article 3 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 3 Definitions For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply:
|
(10) |
in Article 4, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. A design shall be protected by an EU design, if it is new and has individual character.’ |
(11) |
in Article 7(2), the introductory words are replaced by the following: ‘2. A disclosure shall not be taken into consideration for the purpose of applying Articles 5 and 6 if the disclosed design, which is identical with or does not differ in its overall impression from the design for which protection is claimed under a registered EU design, has been made available to the public:’ |
(12) |
Article 12 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 12 Commencement and term of protection of the registered EU design 1. Protection of a registered EU design shall arise upon registration by the Office. 2. A registered EU design shall be registered for a period of five years calculated from the date of filing of the application for registration. The right holder may renew the registration, in accordance with Article 50d, for one or more periods of five years each, up to a total term of protection of 25 years from the date of filing of the application for registration.’ |
(13) |
Article 13 is deleted; |
(14) |
Articles 15 and 16 are replaced by the following: ‘Article 15 Claims relating to the entitlement to an EU design 1. If an unregistered EU design is disclosed or claimed by a person who is not entitled to it under Article 14 or if a registered EU design has been applied for or registered in the name of such a person, the person entitled to it under that Article may, without prejudice to any other remedy which may be open to that person, claim before the competent court or authority of the Member State concerned recognition as the legitimate holder of the EU design. 2. Where a person is jointly entitled to an EU design, that person may, in accordance with paragraph 1, claim recognition as joint holder. 3. Proceedings under paragraphs 1 or 2 shall be barred three years after the date of publication of a registered EU design or the date of disclosure of an unregistered EU design. This provision shall not apply if the person who is not entitled to the EU design was acting in bad faith at the time when such design was applied for, disclosed or acquired. 4. The person entitled to an EU design under Article 14 may submit a request, pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article, for a change of ownership to the Office, together with a final decision of the competent court or authority of the Member State concerned on the entitlement to the EU design. 5. In the case of a registered EU design, the following shall be entered in the Register of EU designs referred to in Article 72 (“the Register”):
Article 16 Effects of a final decision on entitlement to a registered EU design 1. Where there is a complete change of ownership of a registered EU design as a result of proceedings under Article 15(1), licences and other rights shall lapse upon the entry in the Register of the new holder of the registered EU design. 2. If, before the institution of proceedings under Article 15(1) has been registered, the holder or a licensee of the registered EU design has exploited the design within the Union or made serious and effective preparations to do so, that holder or licensee may continue such exploitation provided that they request, within a period of three months of the date of the entry in the Register of the new holder, a non-exclusive licence from the new holder whose name is entered in the Register. The licence shall be granted for a reasonable period and upon reasonable terms. 3. Paragraph 2 shall not apply if the holder of the registered EU design or the licensee was acting in bad faith at the time when that holder or licensee began to exploit the design or to make preparations to do so.’ |
(15) |
Article 18 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 18 Right of the designer to be cited The designer shall have the right, in the same way as the applicant for or the holder of a registered EU design, to be cited as such before the Office and in the Register. If the design is the result of teamwork, the citation of the team may replace the citation of the individual designers. That right shall include the right to enter a change of the name of the designer or of the team in the Register.’ |
(16) |
the following article is inserted after the heading of Section 4: ‘Article 18a Object of protection Protection shall be conferred for those features of the appearance of a registered EU design which are shown visibly in the application for registration.’ |
(17) |
Articles 19 and 20 are replaced by the following: ‘Article 19 Rights conferred by the EU design 1. A registered EU design shall confer on its holder the exclusive right to use it and to prevent any third party not having the consent of the holder from using it. 2. The following, in particular, may be prohibited under paragraph 1:
3. The holder of a registered EU design shall be entitled to prevent all third parties from bringing products, in the course of trade, from third countries into the Union, that are not released for free circulation in the Union, where the design is identically incorporated in or applied to those products, or the design cannot be distinguished in its essential aspects from such products, and the right holder’s authorisation has not been given. The right referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall lapse, if, during proceedings to determine whether the EU design has been infringed, initiated in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*2), evidence is provided by the declarant or the holder of the products that the holder of the registered EU design is not entitled to prohibit the placing of the products on the market in the country of final destination. 4. The holder of an unregistered EU design shall be entitled to prevent acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 only if the contested use results from copying the protected design. The contested use referred to in the first subparagraph shall not be deemed to result from copying the unregistered EU design if it results from an independent work of creation by a designer who may be reasonably thought not to be familiar with the design made available to the public by the holder. 5. Paragraph 4 of this Article shall also apply to a registered EU design subject to deferment of publication as long as the relevant entries in the Register and the file have not been made available to the public in accordance with Article 50(4). Article 20 Limitation of the rights conferred by an EU design 1. The rights conferred by an EU design shall not be exercised in respect of:
2. Paragraph 1, points (c), (d) and (e), shall only apply where the acts are compatible with fair trade practices and do not unduly prejudice the normal exploitation of the design, and in the case referred to in point (c), where mention is made of the source of the product in which the design is incorporated or to which the design is applied. (*2) Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 (OJ L 181, 29.6.2013, p. 15).’;" |
(18) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 20a Repair clause 1. Protection shall not be conferred on an EU design which constitutes a component part of a complex product upon whose appearance the design of the component part is dependent, and which is used within the meaning of Article 19(1) for the sole purpose of the repair of that complex product so as to restore its original appearance. 2. Paragraph 1 shall not be invoked by the manufacturer or the seller of a component part of a complex product who failed to duly inform consumers, through a clear and visible indication on the product or in another appropriate form, about the commercial origin, and the identity of the manufacturer, of the product to be used for the purpose of the repair of the complex product, so that they can make an informed choice between competing products that can be used for the repair. 3. The manufacturer or seller of a component part of a complex product shall not be required to guarantee that the component parts they make or sell are ultimately used by end users for the sole purpose of repair so as to restore the original appearance of the complex product.’ |
(19) |
Article 21 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 21 Exhaustion of rights The rights conferred by an EU design shall not extend to acts relating to a product in which a design included within the scope of protection of the EU design is incorporated or to which it is applied, when the product has been placed on the market in the European Economic Area (EEA) by the holder of the EU design or with the holder’s consent.’ |
(20) |
in Article 24, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘2. An EU design may be declared invalid even after the EU design has lapsed or has been surrendered, if the applicant shows a legitimate interest in obtaining a decision on the merits.’ |
(21) |
Article 25 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 25 Grounds for invalidity 1. An EU design may be declared invalid only in the following situations:
2. The grounds for invalidity provided for in paragraph 1, points (a) and (b), may be invoked by the following:
3. The ground for invalidity provided for in paragraph 1, point (c), of this Article, may be invoked solely by the person who is entitled to the EU design under Article 14. 4. The grounds for invalidity provided for in paragraph 1, points (d), (e) and (f), may be invoked solely by the following:
5. The ground for invalidity provided for in paragraph 1, point (g), may be invoked solely by the person or entity concerned by the improper use. 6. By way of derogation from paragraphs 4 and 5, Member States may provide that the grounds provided for in paragraph 1, points (d) and (g) may also be invoked by the appropriate authority of the Member State in question on its own initiative. 7. A registered EU design shall not be declared invalid where the applicant for or holder of one of the rights referred to in paragraph 1, points (d) to (f), consented expressly to the registration of the EU design before submitting the application for a declaration of invalidity or the counterclaim. 8. Where the applicant for or a holder of one of the rights referred to in paragraph 1, points (d), (e) and (f), has previously applied for a declaration that an EU design is invalid or made a counterclaim in infringement proceedings, they shall not submit a new application for a declaration of invalidity or lodge a new counterclaim on the basis of any of the other rights referred to in those points, which could have been invoked in support of the first application or counterclaim.’ |
(22) |
in Article 26, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. An EU design which is declared invalid shall be deemed not to have had the effects specified in this Regulation as from the outset.’ |
(23) |
the following section is inserted after Article 26:
Article 26a Registration symbol The holder of a registered EU design may inform the public that the design is registered by displaying on the product in which the design is incorporated or to which it is applied the letter D enclosed within a circle (). Such design notice may be accompanied by the registration number of the design or hyperlinked to the entry of the design in the Register.’ |
(24) |
Article 28 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 28 Transfer of the registered EU design 1. An assignment of a registered EU design shall be made in writing and shall be signed by the parties to the contract, except when it is the result of a judgment. An assignment of a registered EU design that does not comply with the requirements set out in the first subparagraph shall be void. 2. At the request of one of the parties, a transfer of a registered EU design shall be entered in the Register and published. 3. An application for registration of a transfer in the Register shall contain information identifying the registered EU design, the new holder and, where applicable, the representative of the new holder. It shall also contain documents duly establishing the transfer in accordance with paragraph 1. 4. Where the conditions for the registration of a transfer, as laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article or in the implementing acts referred to in Article 28a, are not fulfilled, the Office shall notify the applicant of the deficiencies. If the deficiencies are not remedied within the time limit specified by the Office, it shall reject the application for registration of the transfer. 5. A single application for registration of a transfer may be submitted for two or more registered EU designs, provided that the registered holder and the successor in title are the same for all those registered EU designs. 6. As long as the transfer has not been entered in the Register, the successor in title may not invoke the rights arising from the registration of the registered EU design. 7. Where there are time limits to be observed in dealings with the Office, the successor in title may make the corresponding statements to the Office once the application for registration of the transfer has been received by the Office. 8. All documents which require notification to the holder of the registered EU design in accordance with Article 66 shall be addressed to the person registered as holder in the Register.’ |
(25) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 28a Conferral of implementing powers regarding transfer The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying:
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(26) |
Articles 31 and 32 are replaced by the following: ‘Article 31 Insolvency proceedings 1. The only insolvency proceedings in which an EU design may be involved are those opened in the Member State within the territory of which the debtor has his centre of main interests. 2. For insurance undertakings as defined in Article 13, point (1), of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (*3) and credit institutions as defined in Article 4(1), point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*4), the centre of main interests referred to in paragraph 1 shall be the Member State where the undertaking or institution has been authorised. 3. In the case of joint holdership of an EU design, paragraph 1 shall apply to the share of the joint holder. 4. Where an EU design is involved in insolvency proceedings, an entry to this effect shall, at the request of the competent national authority, be made in the Register and published. Article 32 Licensing 1. An EU design may be licensed for the whole or part of the Union. A licence may be exclusive or non-exclusive. 2. The holder may invoke the rights conferred by the EU design against a licensee who contravenes any provision in the licensing contract with regard to:
3. If not stated otherwise in the licensing contract, the licensee may bring proceedings for infringement of an EU design only if its holder consents thereto. However, the holder of an exclusive licence may bring such proceedings if the holder of the EU design, after a formal notice, does not bring infringement proceedings within an appropriate period. 4. A licensee shall, for the purpose of obtaining compensation for damage suffered, be entitled to intervene in infringement proceedings brought by the holder of the EU design. (*3) Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, p. 1)." (*4) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).’;" |
(27) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 32a Procedure for entering licences and other rights in the Register 1. Article 28(3), the rules adopted pursuant to Article 28a, and Article 28(5) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of a right in rem or transfer of a right in rem referred to in Article 29, the levy of execution referred to in Article 30, the involvement in insolvency proceedings referred to in Article 31, as well as to the registration of a licence or transfer of a licence as referred to in Article 32. However, the requirement concerning documents duly establishing the transfer set out in Article 28(3) shall not apply where the request is made by the holder of the EU design. 2. The application for registration of the rights referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be deemed to have been filed until the required fee has been paid. 3. The application for registration of a licence may contain a request to record such licence in the Register as one or more of the following:
Where a request is made to record the licence as a licence referred to in the first subparagraph, point (c), (d), or (e), the application for registration shall indicate the specific product range, the part of the Union or the period for which the licence is granted. 4. Where the conditions for registration of licences and other rights set out in this Regulation are not fulfilled, the Office shall notify the applicant of the deficiency. If the deficiency is not remedied within the time limit specified by the Office, it shall reject the application for registration.’ |
(28) |
Article 33 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 33 Effects vis-à-vis third parties 1. Legal acts referred to in Articles 28, 29 and 32 concerning an EU design shall only have effect vis-à-vis third parties in all the Member States after entry in the Register. Nevertheless, such an act, before it is so entered, shall have effect vis-à-vis third parties who have acquired rights in the registered EU design after the date of that act but who knew of the act at the date on which the rights were acquired. 2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to a person who acquires the registered EU design or a right concerning the registered EU design by way of transfer of the whole of the undertaking or by any other universal succession. 3. The effects vis-à-vis third parties of the legal acts referred to in Article 30 shall be governed by the law of the Member State determined in accordance with Article 27. 4. The effects of bankruptcy or similar proceedings vis-à-vis third parties shall be governed by the law of the Member State in which such proceedings are first brought within the meaning of national law or of conventions applicable in this field.’ |
(29) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 33a Procedure for cancelling or modifying registrations of licences and other rights 1. A registration effected under Article 32a(1) shall be cancelled or modified upon application by one of the parties concerned. 2. The application for cancellation or modification of the registration shall contain the registration number of the registered EU design, or in the case of a multiple registration, the number of each design, and the particulars of the right for which registration is requested to be cancelled or modified. 3. The application for cancellation or modification of the registration shall be accompanied by documents showing that the registered right no longer exists or that the licensee or the holder of another right consents to the cancellation or modification of the registration. 4. Where the requirements for cancellation or modification of the registration are not satisfied, the Office shall notify the applicant of the deficiencies. If the deficiencies are not remedied within the time limit specified by the Office, it shall reject the application for cancellation or modification of the registration.’ |
(30) |
Article 34 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 34 The application for a registered EU design as an object of property Articles 27 to 33a shall apply to applications for registered EU designs. Where the effect of one of those provisions is conditional upon an entry in the Register, that formality shall be performed upon entry of the registered EU design in the Register.’ |
(31) |
Article 35 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 35 Filing of applications 1. An application for a registered EU design shall be filed at the Office. 2. The Office shall issue to the applicant, without delay, a receipt which shall include at least the file number, a representation, description or other identification of the design, the nature and the number of documents and the date of their receipt. In the case of a multiple application, the receipt issued by the Office shall specify the first design and the number of designs filed.’ |
(32) |
Article 36 is amended as follows:
|
(33) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 36a Conferral of implementing powers regarding the application The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the details to be contained in the application for a registered EU design. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(34) |
Article 37 is amended as follows:
|
(35) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 37a Conferral of implementing powers regarding multiple applications The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the details to be contained in the multiple application. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(36) |
Articles 38 and 39 are replaced by the following: ‘Article 38 Date of filing The date of filing of an application for a registered EU design shall be the date on which documents containing the information specified in Article 36(1) are filed with the Office by the applicant, subject to the payment of the application fees referred to in Article 36(4) and Article 37(2) within one month of filing those documents. Article 39 Equivalence of Union filing with national filing An application for a registered EU design which has been accorded a date of filing shall, in the Member States, be equivalent to a regular national filing, including where appropriate the priority claimed for the EU design application.’ |
(37) |
Articles 40, 41 and 42 are replaced by the following: ‘Article 40 Classification and product indications 1. Products in which an EU design is intended to be incorporated or to which it is intended to be applied shall be classified in accordance with the Locarno Classification, as amended and in force at the date of filing of the application. 2. The product indication, as referred to in Article 36(2), shall identify clearly and precisely the nature of the products and shall enable each product to be classified in only one class and subclass of the Locarno Classification, if possible using the harmonised database of product indications made available by the Office. The product indication shall accord with the representation of the design. 3. The products shall be grouped according to the classes of the Locarno Classification, each group being preceded by the number of the class to which that group of products belongs and presented in the order of the classes and subclasses under that classification. 4. When the applicant uses product indications which are not contained in the database referred to in paragraph 2, or which do not accord with the representation of the design, the Office may propose product indications from that database. Where the applicant does not reply within the time limit specified by the Office, it may proceed with the examination based on the proposed product indications. Article 41 Right of priority 1. A person who has duly filed an application for a design right or for a utility model in or for any State party to the Paris Convention, or to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization, or his successors in title, shall enjoy, for the purpose of filing an application for a registered EU design in respect of the same design or utility model, a right of priority for a period of six months from the date of filing of the first application. 2. Every filing that, under the national law of the State where it was made or under bilateral or multilateral agreements, is sufficient to establish the date on which the application was filed, whatever the outcome of the application may be, shall be recognised as giving rise to a right of priority. 3. A subsequent application for a design which was the subject of a previous first application, and which is filed in or in respect of the same State, shall be considered to be the first application for the purpose of determining priority, provided that, at the date of the filing of the subsequent application, the previous application has been withdrawn, abandoned or refused without being open to public inspection and without leaving any rights outstanding, and has not served as a basis for claiming a right of priority. The previous application shall not thereafter serve as a basis for claiming a right of priority. 4. If the first filing has been made in a State which is not a party to the Paris Convention, or to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization, paragraphs 1 to 3 shall apply only in so far as that State, according to published findings, grants, on the basis of the first filing made at the Office and subject to conditions equivalent to those laid down in this Regulation, a right of priority having equivalent effect. The Executive Director shall, where necessary, request the Commission to consider enquiring as to whether that State accords such reciprocal treatment. If the Commission determines that reciprocal treatment is accorded, it shall publish a communication to that effect in the Official Journal of the European Union. 5. The right of priority referred to in paragraph 4 shall apply from the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the communication determining that reciprocal treatment is accorded, unless the communication states an earlier date from which it is applicable. It shall cease to apply from the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of a communication of the Commission to the effect that reciprocal treatment is no longer accorded, unless the communication states an earlier date from which it is applicable. 6. Communications referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 shall also be published in the Official Journal of the Office. Article 42 Claiming priority 1. An applicant for a registered EU design desiring to take advantage of the priority of a previous application shall file a declaration of priority either together with the application or within two months of the date of filing. Such declaration of priority shall include the date and country of the previous application. The file number of the previous application and the documentation in support of the priority claim shall be filed within three months of the date of filing of the declaration of priority. 2. The Executive Director may determine that the documentation to be provided by the applicant in support of the priority claim may consist of less than what is required under the implementing acts adopted pursuant to Article 42a, subject to compliance with the principle of equal treatment of applicants and provided that the information required is available to the Office from other sources.’ |
(38) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 42a Conferral of implementing powers regarding the claim of priority The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the kind of documentation to be filed for claiming the priority of a previous application in accordance with Article 42(1). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(39) |
Article 43 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 43 Effect of priority right The right of priority shall have the effect that the date of priority shall count as the date of the filing of the application for a registered EU design for the purposes of Articles 5, 6, 7 and 22, Article 25(1), points (d), (e) and (f), and Article 50(1).’ |
(40) |
Article 44 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 44 Exhibition priority 1. If an applicant for a registered EU design has disclosed products in which the design is incorporated, or to which it is applied, at an official or officially recognised international exhibition falling within the 1928 Convention on International Exhibitions as last revised on 30 November 1972, the applicant may, if the application is filed within a period of six months from the date of the first disclosure of such products, claim a right of priority from that date. 2. An applicant who wishes to claim priority pursuant to paragraph 1 shall file a declaration of priority either together with the application or within two months of the date of filing. The applicant shall, within three months of the declaration of priority, file evidence that the products in which the design is incorporated, or to which it is applied, have been disclosed within the meaning of paragraph 1. 3. An exhibition priority granted in a Member State or in a third country shall not extend the period of priority laid down in Article 41.’ |
(41) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 44a Conferral of implementing powers The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the type and details of evidence to be filed for claiming an exhibition priority in accordance with Article 44(2). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(42) |
the heading of Title V is replaced by the following: ‘TITLE V REGISTRATION PROCEDURE, RENEWAL AND ALTERATION’ ; |
(43) |
Article 45 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 45 Examination as to formal requirements for filing 1. The Office shall examine whether the application for a registered EU design complies with the requirements for the accordance of a date of filing laid down in Article 38. 2. The Office shall examine whether:
3. Where the application for a registered EU design does not satisfy the requirements referred to in paragraph 1 or 2, the Office shall request the applicant to remedy the deficiencies or the default on payment within two months of the notification of that request. 4. If the applicant does not comply with the Office’s request referred to in paragraph 3 to comply with the requirements referred to in paragraph 1, the application shall not be dealt with as an application for a registered EU design. If the applicant complies with that request with regard to those requirements, the Office shall accord as the date of filing of the application the date on which the deficiencies or the default on payment are remedied. 5. If the applicant does not comply with the Office’s request referred to in paragraph 3 to comply with the requirements referred to in paragraph 2, points (a) and (b), the Office shall refuse the application. 6. If the applicant does not comply with the Office’s request referred to in paragraph 3 to comply with the requirements referred to in paragraph 2, point (c), the application shall be refused in respect of the additional designs unless it is clear which designs the amount paid is intended to cover. In the absence of other criteria to determine which designs are intended to be covered, the Office shall treat the designs in the consecutive numerical order in which they are contained in the multiple application. The application shall be refused in respect of those designs for which the additional fee for deferment of publication has not been paid or has not been paid in full. 7. Failure to satisfy the requirements concerning a priority claim shall result in the loss of the right of priority for the application.’ |
(44) |
Article 46 is deleted; |
(45) |
Article 47 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 47 Grounds for non-registrability 1. If the Office, in carrying out the examination pursuant to Article 45 of this Regulation, notices that the design for which protection is sought does not correspond to the definition in Article 3, point (1), of this Regulation, that it is contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality or, without the consent of the competent authorities to the registration having been given, that it constitutes an improper use of any of the items listed in Article 6ter of the Paris Convention, or of badges, emblems and escutcheons other than those covered by Article 6ter of that Convention and which are of particular public interest in a Member State, it shall notify the applicant that the design is non-registrable, specifying the ground for non-registrability. 2. In the notification referred to in paragraph 1, the Office shall specify a period within which the applicant may submit observations, withdraw the application or the objected views or submit an amended representation of the design that differs only in immaterial details from the representation as originally filed. 3. Where the applicant fails to overcome the grounds for non-registrability, the Office shall refuse the application. If those grounds concern only some of the designs contained in a multiple application, the Office shall refuse the application only in so far as those designs are concerned.’ |
(46) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 47a Withdrawal and amendment of the application 1. The applicant may at any time withdraw an EU design application or, in the case of a multiple application, withdraw some of the designs contained in the application. 2. The applicant may at any time amend the representation of the EU design applied for in immaterial details.’ |
(47) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 47b Delegation of power regarding the amendment of the application The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a to supplement this Regulation by specifying the details of the procedure for the amendment of the application as referred to in Article 47a(2).’ |
(48) |
Article 48 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 48 Registration 1. If the requirements for an application for a registered EU design have been fulfilled, and to the extent that the application has not been refused pursuant to Article 47, the Office shall enter the design contained in the application and the particulars referred to in Article 72(2) in the Register. 2. If the application contains a request for deferment of publication pursuant to Article 50, an indication of that request and the date of expiry of the period of deferment shall also be entered in the Register. 3. The registration shall bear the date of filing of the application referred to in Article 38. 4. The fees payable pursuant to Article 36(4) and Article 37(2) shall not be refunded even if the design applied for is not registered.’ |
(49) |
Article 49 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 49 Publication Upon registration, the Office shall publish the registered EU design in the EU Designs Bulletin as referred to in Article 73(1), point (a).’ |
(50) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 49a Conferral of implementing powers regarding publication The Commission shall adopt implementing acts laying down the details to be contained in the publication referred to in Article 49. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(51) |
Article 50 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 50 Deferment of publication 1. The applicant for a registered EU design may request, when filing the application, that the publication of the registered EU design be deferred for a period of up to 30 months from the date of filing of the application or, if priority is claimed, from the date of priority. 2. Upon a request referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, where the conditions set out in Article 48 are satisfied, the registered EU design shall be registered, but neither the representation of the design nor any file relating to the application shall, subject to Article 74(2), be open to public inspection. 3. The Office shall publish in the EU Designs Bulletin an indication of a request referred to in paragraph 1. The indication shall be accompanied by information identifying the right holder of the registered design, the name of the representative, if any, the date of filing of the application and of registration of the design, and the file number of the application. Neither the representation of the design nor any particulars identifying its appearance shall be published. 4. At the expiry of the period of deferment, or at any earlier date requested by the right holder, the Office shall open to public inspection all the entries in the Register and the file relating to the application and shall publish the registered EU design in the EU Designs Bulletin. 5. The right holder may prevent publication of the registered EU design as referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, by submitting a request for surrender of the EU design in accordance with Article 51 at the latest three months before expiry of the period of deferment. Any requests for the entry of the surrender in the Register that do not comply with the requirements set out in Article 51 and the implementing acts adopted pursuant to Article 51a, or that are submitted after the three month-time limit referred to in this paragraph, shall be rejected. 6. In the case of a registration on the basis of a multiple application pursuant to Article 37, the holder shall, together with the request for earlier publication referred to in paragraph 4 or the request for surrender referred to in paragraph 5, clearly indicate which of the designs contained in that application are to be published earlier or surrendered and for which designs deferment of publication is to be continued. 7. If the holder fails to comply with the requirement set out in paragraph 6, the Office shall request the holder to remedy the deficiency within a specified time limit, which shall in no case expire after the 30-month deferment period. 8. Failure to remedy the deficiency referred to in paragraph 7 within the specified time limit shall result in the request for early publication being deemed not to have been filed or the request for surrender being rejected. 9. The institution of legal proceedings on the basis of a registered EU design during the period of deferment of publication shall be subject to the condition that the information contained in the Register and in the file relating to the application has been communicated to the person against whom the action is brought.’ |
(52) |
the following articles are inserted: ‘Article 50a Publication after the period of deferment The Office shall, at the expiry of the period of deferment referred to in Article 50 or, in the case of a request for earlier publication, as soon as technically possible:
Article 50b Registration certificates After publication of the registered EU design, the Office shall issue to the holder a certificate of registration. The Office shall provide certified or uncertified copies of the certificate, upon request. The certificates and copies shall be issued by electronic means.’ |
(53) |
The following articles are inserted: ‘Article 50c Conferral of implementing powers The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the details to be contained in and the form of the certificate of registration referred to in Article 50b. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2). Article 50d Renewal 1. Registration of the EU design shall be renewed at the request of the right holder of the registered EU design or of any person expressly authorised by the right holder to request the renewal, provided that the renewal fees have been paid. 2. The Office shall inform the right holder of the registered EU design and any person having a registered right in respect of the EU design of the expiry of the registration at least six months before the date of such expiry. Failure to give such information shall not involve the responsibility of the Office and shall not affect the expiry of the registration. 3. The request for renewal shall be submitted within a six months period prior to the expiry of the registration. The renewal fee shall also be paid within that period. Failing that, the request may be submitted and the fee paid within a further period of six months following the expiry of the registration, provided that an additional fee for late payment of the renewal fee or late submission of the request for renewal is paid within that further period. 4. The request for renewal referred to in paragraph 1 shall include:
If the renewal fees are paid, the payment shall be deemed to constitute a request for renewal provided that it contains all necessary indications to establish the purpose of the payment. 5. In the case of a registration on the basis of a multiple application pursuant to Article 37, where the fees paid are insufficient to cover all the designs for which renewal is requested, registration shall be renewed in respect of those designs which the amount paid is clearly intended to cover. In the absence of other criteria for determining which designs are intended to be covered, the Office shall treat the designs in the consecutive numerical order in which they are contained in the multiple application. 6. Renewal shall take effect from the day following the date on which the existing registration expires. The renewal shall be entered in the Register. 7. Where the request for renewal is filed within the periods provided for in paragraph 3, but the other conditions for renewal provided for in this Article are not satisfied, the Office shall inform the applicant of the deficiencies found. 8. Where a request for renewal is not submitted or is submitted after the expiry of the period provided for in paragraph 3, or where the fees are not paid or are paid only after the period in question has expired, or where the deficiencies referred to in paragraph 7 are not remedied within that period, the Office shall determine that the registration has expired and shall notify the holder of the EU design accordingly. Where the determination has become final, the Office shall cancel the design from the Register. The cancellation shall take effect from the day following the date on which the existing registration expired. Where the renewal fees have been paid but the registration is not renewed, those fees shall be refunded. 9. A single request for renewal may be submitted for two or more designs provided that the holder or the representative is the same for all designs covered by the request. The required renewal fee shall be paid in respect of each design for which renewal is requested.’ |
(54) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 50e Alteration 1. The representation of the registered EU design shall not be altered in the Register during the period of registration or on renewal thereof except in immaterial details. 2. A request by the holder for alteration shall include the representation of the registered EU design in its altered version. 3. A request for alteration shall be deemed not to have been filed until the required fee has been paid. If the fee has not been paid or has not been paid in full, the Office shall inform the holder accordingly. A single request may be made for the alteration of the same element in two or more registrations, provided that the holder is the same for all designs. The required alteration fee shall be paid in respect of each registration to be altered. If the requirements for the alteration of the registration set out in this Article and the implementing acts adopted pursuant to Article 50f are not fulfilled, the Office shall communicate the deficiency to the holder. If the deficiency is not remedied within the time limit specified by the Office, the Office shall reject the request for alteration. 4. The publication of the registration of the alteration shall contain a representation of the registered EU design as altered.’ |
(55) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 50f Conferral of implementing powers regarding alteration The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the details to be contained in the request for alteration referred to in Article 50e(2). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(56) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 50g Change of name or address 1. The holder of a registered EU design shall inform the Office about a change of the holder’s name or address, which is not the consequence of a transfer or a change of ownership of the registered EU design. 2. A single request may be made for a change of the name or address in respect of two or more registrations of the same holder. 3. If the requirements for a change of name or address set out in this Article and in the implementing acts adopted pursuant to Article 50h are not fulfilled, the Office shall communicate the deficiency to the holder of the registered EU design. If the deficiency is not remedied within the time limit specified by the Office, the Office shall reject the request. 4. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall also apply to a change of the name or address of the registered representative. 5. The Office shall enter the particulars referred to in Article 72(3), points (a) and (b), in the Register. 6. Paragraphs 1 to 4 shall apply to applications for registered EU designs. The change shall be entered in the files kept by the Office concerning the EU design application.’ |
(57) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 50h Conferral of implementing powers regarding change of name or address The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the details to be contained in a request for a change of name or address pursuant to Article 50g(1). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(58) |
Article 51 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 51 Surrender 1. The surrender of a registered EU design shall be declared to the Office in writing by the right holder. It shall not have effect until it has been entered in the Register. 2. If an EU design which is subject to deferment of publication is surrendered it shall be deemed from the outset not to have had the effects specified in this Regulation. 3. A surrender shall be registered only with the agreement of the proprietor of a right entered in the Register. If a licence has been registered, a surrender shall be entered in the Register only if the holder of the registered EU design proves that the licensee has been informed about the holder’s intention to surrender. The entry of the surrender shall be made on expiry of the three-month period after the date on which the holder satisfies the Office that the licensee has been informed of the intention to surrender, or before the expiry of that period, as soon as the holder proves that the licensee has given consent. 4. If proceedings pursuant to Article 15 relating to the entitlement to a registered EU design have been instituted before the competent court or authority, the Office shall not enter the surrender in the Register without the agreement of the claimant. 5. If the requirements governing surrender set out in this Article and in the implementing acts adopted pursuant to Article 51a are not fulfilled, the Office shall communicate the deficiencies to the right holder declaring the surrender. If the deficiencies are not remedied within the time limit specified by the Office, the Office shall not enter the surrender in the Register.’ |
(59) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 51a Conferral of implementing powers regarding surrender The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying:
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(60) |
Article 52 is amended as follows:
|
(61) |
Article 53 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 53 Examination of the application 1. If the Office finds that the application for a declaration of invalidity is admissible, the Office shall examine whether the grounds for invalidity referred to in Article 25 prejudice the maintenance of the registered EU design. 2. When examining the application for a declaration of invalidity, the Office shall invite the parties, as often as necessary, to file observations, within a period to be fixed by the Office, on communications from the other parties or issued by the Office itself. 3. If the holder of the registered EU design so requests, an applicant for a declaration of invalidity invoking an earlier EU or national trade mark as a distinctive sign within the meaning of Article 25(1), point (e), of this Regulation shall furnish proof of genuine use of such mark in accordance with Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 and the rules adopted pursuant to Article 53a of this Regulation. 4. A record of the Office’s decision on the application for a declaration of invalidity shall be entered in the Register once that decision has become final. 5. The Office may invite the parties to make a friendly settlement.’ |
(62) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 53a Delegation of power regarding the declaration of invalidity The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a to supplement this Regulation by specifying the details of the proceedings for the declaration of invalidity of an EU design as referred to in Articles 52 and 53, including the possibility of examining an application for a declaration of invalidity as a matter of priority where the holder of the registered EU design does not contest the grounds of invalidity or the relief sought.’ |
(63) |
Article 55 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 55 Decisions subject to appeal 1. An appeal shall lie from the decisions of the Office referred to in Article 102, points (a), (b) and (c). 2. Articles 66 to 72 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall apply to appeals dealt with by the Boards of Appeal under this Regulation, unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation.’ |
(64) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 55a Delegation of power regarding appeal proceedings The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a to supplement this Regulation by specifying:
|
(65) |
Articles 56 to 61 are deleted; |
(66) |
Article 62 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 62 Decisions and communications of the Office 1. Decisions of the Office shall state the reasons on which they are based. They shall be based only on reasons or evidence on which the parties concerned have had an opportunity to present their comments. Where oral proceedings are held before the Office, the decision may be given orally. Subsequently, the decision shall be notified in writing to the parties. 2. Any decision, communication or notice from the Office shall indicate the department or division of the Office as well as the name or the names of the official or officials responsible. They shall be signed by that official or those officials, or, instead of a signature, carry a printed or stamped seal of the Office. The Executive Director may determine that other means of identifying the department or division of the Office and the name of the official or officials responsible or an identification other than a seal may be used where decisions, communications or notices are transmitted by any technical means of communication. 3. Decisions of the Office which are subject to appeal shall be accompanied by a written communication indicating that any notice of appeal is to be filed in writing at the Office within two months of the date of notification of the decision in question. Any such communication shall also draw the attention of the parties to the provisions laid down in Articles 66, 67, 68, 71 and 72 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, which also apply to appeals under this Regulation pursuant to Article 55(2) of this Regulation. The parties shall not plead any failure on the part of the Office to communicate the availability of appeal proceedings.’ |
(67) |
in Article 63, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. In proceedings before it, the Office shall examine the facts of its own motion. However, in proceedings relating to a declaration of invalidity, the Office shall be restricted in this examination to the grounds, facts, evidence and arguments provided by the parties and the relief sought.’ |
(68) |
Article 64 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 64 Oral proceedings 1. If the Office considers that oral proceedings would be expedient, they shall be held either at the instance of the Office or at the request of any party to the proceedings. 2. Oral proceedings before the examiners and the department in charge of the Register shall not be public. 3. Oral proceedings, including delivery of the decision, before the Invalidity Divisions and the Boards of Appeal shall be public, unless the department before which the proceedings are taking place decides otherwise in cases where admission of the public could have serious and unjustified disadvantages, in particular for a party to the proceedings.’ |
(69) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 64a Delegation of power regarding oral proceedings The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a to supplement this Regulation by setting out the detailed arrangements for oral proceedings referred to in Article 64, including the detailed arrangements for the use of languages in accordance with Article 98.’ |
(70) |
Article 65 is amended as follows:
|
(71) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 65a Delegation of power regarding the taking of evidence The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a to supplement this Regulation by setting out the detailed arrangements for the taking of evidence referred to in Article 65.’ |
(72) |
Article 66 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 66 Notification 1. The Office shall, of its own motion, notify those concerned of decisions and summonses and of any notice or other communication from which a time limit is reckoned, or of which those concerned are to be notified under other provisions of this Regulation or of acts adopted pursuant to this Regulation, or of which notification has been ordered by the Executive Director. 2. Notification shall be effected by electronic means. The details regarding electronic means shall be determined by the Executive Director. 3. Where notification has proved to be impossible by the Office, notification shall be effected by public notice. The Executive Director shall determine how the public notice is to be given and shall fix the beginning of the one-month period on the expiry of which the document shall be deemed to have been notified.’ |
(73) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 66a Delegation of power regarding notification The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a to supplement this Regulation by setting out the detailed arrangements for notification referred to in Article 66.’ |
(74) |
the following articles are inserted: ‘Article 66b Notification of loss of rights Where the Office finds that the loss of any rights results from this Regulation or acts adopted pursuant to this Regulation, without any decision having been taken, it shall communicate that finding to the persons concerned in accordance with Article 66. The persons concerned may apply for a decision on the matter within two months of notification of the communication, if they consider that the finding of the Office is incorrect. The Office shall adopt such a decision only where it disagrees with the persons requesting it. If that is not the case, the Office shall amend its finding and inform the persons requesting the decision thereof. Article 66c Communications to the Office Communications addressed to the Office shall be effected by electronic means. The Executive Director shall determine the electronic means to be used and the manner and technical conditions under which such electronic means are to be used.’ |
(75) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 66d Delegation of power regarding communications to the Office The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a to supplement this Regulation by specifying the rules on communications addressed to the Office as referred to in Article 66c and the forms for such communication that are to be made available by the Office.’ |
(76) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 66e Time limits 1. Time limits shall be laid down in terms of full years, months, weeks or days. Calculation shall start on the day following the day on which the relevant event occurred. The duration of time limits shall be no less than one month and no more than six months, unless otherwise set out in this Regulation or in any acts adopted pursuant to this Regulation. 2. The Executive Director shall determine, before the commencement of each calendar year, the days on which the Office is not open for receipt of documents. 3. The Executive Director shall determine the duration of the period of interruption in the case of an actual interruption of the Office’s connection to authorised electronic means of communication. 4. If an exceptional occurrence, such as a natural disaster or strike, interrupts or interferes with proper communication from the parties to the proceedings to the Office or vice-versa, the Executive Director may determine that, for parties to the proceedings that have their residence or registered office in the geographical area affected by the exceptional occurrence, or who have appointed a representative with a place of business in that area, all time limits that otherwise would expire on or after the date of commencement of such occurrence shall be extended until a certain date. When determining that date, the Executive Director shall assess when the exceptional occurrence comes to an end. If the occurrence affects the seat of the Office, such determination of the Executive Director shall specify that it applies in respect of all parties to the proceedings.’ |
(77) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 66f Delegation of power regarding calculation and duration of time limits The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a to supplement this Regulation by specifying the details regarding the calculation and duration of time limits referred to in Article 66e.’ |
(78) |
the following articles are inserted: ‘Article 66g Correction of errors and manifest oversights 1. The Office shall correct any linguistic errors or errors of transcription and manifest oversights in its decisions, errors in registering an EU design or errors in publishing the registration, of its own motion or at the request of a party. 2. Where the correction of errors in the registration of an EU design or the publication of the registration is requested by the holder, Article 50g shall apply mutatis mutandis. 3. Corrections of errors in the registration of an EU design and in the publication of the registration shall be published by the Office. Article 66h Cancellation of entries in the Register and revocation of decisions 1. Where the Office has made an entry in the Register or taken a decision which contains an obvious error attributable to the Office, it shall ensure that the entry is cancelled or the decision is revoked. Where there is only one party to the proceedings and the entry or the act affects that party’s rights, cancellation or revocation shall be determined even if the error was not evident to the party. 2. Cancellation or revocation as referred to in paragraph 1 shall be determined, of its own motion or at the request of one of the parties to the proceedings, by the department which made the entry or took the decision. The cancellation of the entry in the Register or the revocation of the decision shall be effected within one year of the date on which the entry was made or the decision was taken, after consultation with the parties to the proceedings and any proprietor of rights to the EU design in question that are entered in the Register. The Office shall keep records of any such cancellation or revocation. 3. This Article shall be without prejudice to the right of the parties to submit an appeal under Articles 55 and 55a or to the possibility of correcting errors and manifest oversights under Article 66g. Where an appeal has been filed against a decision of the Office containing an error, the appeal proceedings shall become devoid of purpose upon revocation by the Office of its decision pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article. In the latter case, the appeal fee shall be reimbursed to the appellant.’ |
(79) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 66i Delegation of power regarding cancellation of entries and revocation of decisions The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a to supplement this Regulation by setting out the procedure for the cancellation of an entry in the Register or the revocation of a decision as referred to in Article 66h.’ |
(80) |
Article 67 is amended as follows:
|
(81) |
the following articles are inserted: ‘Article 67a Continuation of proceedings 1. An applicant for, or a holder of, a registered EU design or any other party to proceedings before the Office who has not observed a time limit vis-à-vis the Office may, upon request, obtain the continuation of proceedings, provided that at the time the request is made the omitted act has been carried out. The request for continuation of proceedings shall be admissible only if it is submitted within two months of the expiry of the unobserved time limit. The request shall not be deemed to have been filed until the fee for continuation of the proceedings has been paid. 2. Continuation of proceedings shall not be granted in the event of non-observance of the time limits laid down in:
3. The department competent to decide on the omitted act shall decide upon the request for continuation. 4. If the Office accepts the request for continuation, the consequences of having failed to observe the time limit shall be deemed not to have occurred. If a decision has been taken between the expiry of that time limit and the request for the continuation of proceedings, the department competent to decide on the omitted act shall review the decision and, where completion of the omitted act itself is sufficient, take a different decision. If, following the review, the Office concludes that the original decision does not require to be altered, it shall confirm that decision in writing. 5. If the Office rejects the request for continuation, the fee shall be refunded. Article 67b Interruption of proceedings 1. Proceedings before the Office shall be interrupted:
To the extent that the death or incapacity referred to in the first subparagraph, point (a), does not affect the authorisation of a representative appointed under Article 78, proceedings shall be interrupted only on request by such representative. 2. Proceedings before the Office may be resumed as soon as the identity of the person authorised to continue them has been established or the Office has exhausted all reasonable attempts to establish the identity of such person.’ |
(82) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 67c Delegation of power regarding the resumption of proceedings The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a to supplement this Regulation by setting out the detailed arrangements for the resumption of proceedings before the Office referred to in Article 67b(2).’ |
(83) |
Article 68 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 68 Reference to general principles In the absence of procedural provisions in this Regulation or in acts adopted pursuant to this Regulation, the Office shall take into account the principles of procedural law generally recognised in the Member States.’ |
(84) |
in Article 69, paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following: ‘1. Rights of the Office to the payment of fees shall lapse after four years from the end of the calendar year in which the fee fell due. 2. Rights against the Office for the refunding of fees or sums of money paid in excess of a fee shall lapse after four years from the end of the calendar year in which the right arose.’ |
(85) |
Article 70 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 70 Apportionment of costs 1. The losing party in proceedings for a declaration of invalidity of a registered EU design or appeal proceedings shall bear the fees paid by the other party for the application for a declaration of invalidity and for appeal. The losing party shall also bear the costs incurred by the other party that are essential to the proceedings, including travel and subsistence and the remuneration of a representative within the meaning of Article 78(1), within the maximum rates set for each category of costs in the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 70a. 2. Where each party succeeds on some and fails on other heads, or where reasons of equity so dictate, the Invalidity Division or Board of Appeal shall decide on an apportionment of costs different from that set out in paragraph 1. 3. A party who terminates the proceedings by withdrawing the EU design application, the application for a declaration of invalidity or the appeal, by not renewing the registration of the EU design, or by surrendering the registered EU design, shall bear the fees and the costs incurred by the other party as set out in paragraphs 1 and 2. 4. Where a case does not proceed to judgment, the costs shall be at the discretion of the Invalidity Division or Board of Appeal. 5. Where the parties conclude before the Invalidity Division or Board of Appeal a settlement of costs differing from that provided for in paragraphs 1 to 4, the body concerned shall take note of that agreement. 6. The Invalidity Division or Board of Appeal shall fix of its own motion the amount of the costs to be paid pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 5 of this Article when the costs to be paid are limited to the fees paid to the Office and the representation costs. In all other cases, the registry of the Board of Appeal or Invalidity Division shall fix, upon request, the amount of the costs to be paid. The request shall be admissible only for a period of two months following the date on which the decision for which a request was made for the costs to be fixed becomes final and shall be accompanied by a bill and supporting evidence. For the costs of representation pursuant to Article 78(1), an assurance by the representative that the costs have been incurred shall be sufficient. For other costs, it shall be sufficient if their plausibility is established. Where the amount of the costs is fixed pursuant to the first subparagraph of this paragraph, representation costs shall be awarded at the level laid down in the implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 70a and irrespective of whether they have been actually incurred. 7. Decisions on the fixing of costs adopted in accordance with paragraph 6 shall state the reasons on which they are based and may be reviewed by the Invalidity Division or Board of Appeal following a request filed within one month of the date of notification of the decision. It shall not be deemed to be filed until the fee for reviewing the amount of the costs has been paid. The Invalidity Division or the Board of Appeal, as the case may be, shall take a decision on the request for a review of the decision on the fixing of costs without oral proceedings.’ |
(86) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 70a Conferral of implementing powers regarding maximum rates for costs The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the maximum rates for costs essential to the proceedings and actually incurred by the successful party as referred to in Article 70(1). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2). When specifying the maximum rates with respect to travel and subsistence costs, the Commission shall take into account the distance between the place of residence or business of the party, representative, witness or expert and the place where the oral proceedings are held, the procedural stage at which the costs have been incurred, and, as far as costs of representation within the meaning of to Article 78(1) are concerned, the need to ensure that the obligation to bear the costs cannot be misused for tactical reasons by the other party. In addition, subsistence expenses shall be calculated in accordance with the Staff Regulations of Officials of the Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Union, laid down in Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (*5). The losing party shall bear the costs for one party in the proceedings only and, where applicable, one representative only. (*5) OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/1968/259(1)/oj.’;" |
(87) |
in Article 71, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘2. Enforcement shall be governed by the rules of civil procedure in force in the Member State in the territory of which it is carried out. Each Member State shall designate a single authority responsible for verifying the authenticity of the decision referred to in paragraph 1 and shall communicate its contact details to the Office, the Court of Justice and the Commission. The order for enforcement shall be appended to the decision by that authority, with the verification of the authenticity of the decision as the sole formality.’ |
(88) |
Article 72 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 72 Register of EU designs 1. The Office shall keep a Register of registered EU designs which it shall keep up to date. 2. The Register shall contain the following entries relating to EU design registrations:
3. The Register shall also contain the following entries, each accompanied by the date of their recording:
4. The Executive Director may determine that items other than those referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 are to be entered in the Register. 5. The Register may be maintained in electronic form. The Office shall collect, organise, make public and store the items referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, including any personal data, for the purposes laid down in paragraph 8. The Office shall keep the Register easily accessible for public inspection. 6. The holder of a registered EU design shall be notified of any change in the Register. 7. The Office shall, where access to the Register is not restricted pursuant to Article 74(5), provide, by electronic means, certified or uncertified extracts from the Register upon request. 8. The processing of the data concerning the entries set out in paragraphs 2 and 3, including any personal data, shall take place for the purposes of:
9. All the data, including personal data, concerning the entries set out in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall be considered to be of public interest and may be accessed by any third party except to the extent that Article 50(2) provides otherwise. The entries in the Register shall be kept for an indefinite period.’ |
(89) |
the following articles are inserted: ‘Article 72a Database 1. In addition to the obligation to keep a Register as set out in Article 72, the Office shall collect and store in an electronic database all the particulars provided by holders or any other party to the proceedings pursuant to this Regulation or acts adopted pursuant to it. 2. The electronic database may include personal data, beyond those included in the Register pursuant to Article 72, to the extent that such data are required by this Regulation or by acts adopted pursuant to it. The collection, storage and processing of personal data shall serve the purposes of:
3. The Executive Director shall determine the conditions of access to the database and the manner in which the contents, other than the personal data referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article but including the data listed in Article 72, may be made available. 4. Access to the personal data referred to in paragraph 2 shall be restricted and such data shall not be made publicly available unless the party concerned has expressly consented. 5. All data shall be kept indefinitely. However, the party concerned may request the removal of any personal data from the database after 18 months from the expiry of the registered EU design or the closure of the relevant inter partes procedure. The party concerned shall have the right to obtain the correction of inaccurate or erroneous data at any time. Article 72b Online access to decisions 1. The decisions of the Office regarding registered EU designs shall be made available online for the information and consultation of the general public. Any party to the proceedings that led to the adoption of the decision may request the removal of any personal data included in the decision. 2. The Office may provide online access to judgments of national and Union courts related to its tasks in order to raise public awareness of intellectual property matters and promote convergence of practices. The Office shall respect the conditions of the initial publication with regard to personal data.’ |
(90) |
Article 73 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 73 Periodical publications 1. The Office shall periodically publish:
The publications referred to in the first subparagraph, points (a) and (b), may be effected by electronic means. 2. The European Union Designs Bulletin shall be published in a manner and at a frequency to be determined by the Executive Director. 3. The Official Journal of the Office shall be published in the languages of the Office. However, the Executive Director may determine that certain items are to be published in the Official Journal of the Office in the official languages of the Union.’ |
(91) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 73a Conferral of implementing powers regarding periodical publications The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying:
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(92) |
Article 74 is amended as follows:
|
(93) |
the following articles are inserted: ‘Article 74a Procedures for the inspection of files 1. Inspection of the files of registered EU designs requested pursuant to Article 74(3) shall be of the technical means of storage of the files. Such inspection shall take place online. The Executive Director shall determine the means of inspection. 2. Where the request for inspection of the files relates to an application for a registered EU design or to a registered EU design which are subject to deferment of publication in accordance with Article 50 or which, being subject to such deferment, have been surrendered before or on the date of expiry of that period, the request shall contain evidence that:
3. Upon request, inspection of the files shall be effected by means of electronic copies of file documents. The Office shall also, upon request, issue certified or uncertified copies of the application for a registered EU design by electronic means. Article 74b Communication of information contained in the files Subject to the restrictions provided for in Article 74, the Office may, upon request, communicate information from any file of any procedure relating to an EU design application or to a registered EU design. Article 74c Keeping of files 1. The Office shall keep the files of any procedure relating to EU design applications and to registered EU designs. The Executive Director shall determine the form in which those files are to be kept. 2. Where the files are kept in electronic format, the electronic files, or back-up copies thereof, shall be kept indefinitely. The original documents filed by parties to the proceedings, and forming the basis of such electronic files, shall be disposed of after a period following their reception by the Office, which shall be determined by the Executive Director. 3. Where, and to the extent that, files or parts of the files are kept in any form other than electronically, documents or items of evidence constituting part of such files shall be kept for at least five years from the end of the year in which:
|
(94) |
Article 75 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 75 Administrative cooperation 1. Unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation or in national law, the Office and the courts or authorities of the Member States shall upon request give assistance to each other by communicating information or opening files for inspection. Where the Office opens files to inspection by courts, public prosecutors’ offices or central industrial property offices, the inspection shall not be subject to the restrictions laid down in Article 74. 2. The Office shall not charge fees for the communication of information or the opening of files for inspection.’ |
(95) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 75a Conferral of implementing powers regarding administrative cooperation The Commission shall adopt implementing acts setting out the detailed arrangements for the exchange of information between the Office and the authorities of the Member States and for the opening of files for inspection as referred to in Article 75, taking into account the restrictions to which the inspection of files relating to EU design applications or registrations is subject, pursuant to Article 74, when they are opened to third parties. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(96) |
Article 76 is deleted; |
(97) |
Article 77 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 77 General principles of representation 1. Subject to paragraph 2, no person shall be compelled to be represented before the Office. 2. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, second subparagraph, of this Article, natural or legal persons having neither their domicile nor their principal place of business or a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the EEA shall be represented before the Office in accordance with Article 78(1) in all proceedings provided for by this Regulation, other than the filing of an application for a registered EU design. 3. Natural or legal persons having their domicile or principal place of business or a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the EEA may be represented before the Office by an employee. An employee of a legal person to which this paragraph applies may also represent other legal persons which have economic connections with the first legal person, even if those other legal persons have neither their domicile nor their principal place of business nor a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment within the EEA. Employees who represent persons within the meaning of this paragraph shall, at the request of the Office or, where appropriate, of the party to the proceedings, provide the Office with a signed authorisation for insertion in the files. 4. Where there is more than one applicant or more than one third party acting in common, a common representative shall be appointed.’ |
(98) |
Article 78 is amended as follows:
|
(99) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 78a Delegation of power regarding professional representation The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a to supplement this Regulation by specifying:
|
(100) |
Article 79 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 79 Application of Union rules on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters 1. Unless otherwise specified in this Regulation, the Union rules on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters shall apply to proceedings relating to EU designs and applications for registered EU designs, as well as to proceedings relating to simultaneous and successive actions on the basis of EU designs and national designs. 2. In the case of proceedings in respect of the actions and claims referred to in Article 81 of this Regulation:
3. References in this Regulation to Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 shall include, where appropriate, the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters done on 19 October 2005. (*6) Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p. 1).’;" |
(101) |
in Article 80, paragraph 5 is deleted; |
(102) |
Article 82 is amended as follows:
|
(103) |
in Article 84, the following paragraphs are added: ‘5. The EU design court with which a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity of a registered EU design has been filed shall not proceed with the examination of the counterclaim, until either the interested party or the court has informed the Office of the date on which the counterclaim was filed. The Office shall record that information in the Register in accordance with Article 72(3), point (q). If an application for a declaration of invalidity of the registered EU design had been filed with the Office before the counterclaim was filed, the court shall be informed thereof by the Office and stay the proceedings in accordance with Article 91(1) until the decision on the application is final or the application is withdrawn. 6. The EU design court hearing a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity of a registered EU design may, on application by the right holder of the registered EU design and after hearing the other parties, stay the proceedings and request the defendant to submit an application for a declaration of invalidity to the Office within a time limit which the court shall determine. If the application is not made within the time limit, the proceedings shall continue and the counterclaim shall be deemed withdrawn. Article 91(3) shall apply.’ |
(104) |
Article 86 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 86 Judgments of invalidity 1. Where in proceedings before an EU design court, the EU design has been put in issue by way of a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity:
2. An EU design court shall reject a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity of a registered EU design if a decision taken by the Office relating to the same subject matter and cause of action and involving the same parties has already become final. 3. Where an EU design court has given a judgment which has become final on a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity of a registered EU design, a copy of the judgment shall be sent to the Office without delay, either by the court or by any of the parties to the national proceedings. The Office or any other interested party may request information about such judgment. The Office shall enter the judgment in the Register in accordance with Article 72(3), point (r).’ |
(105) |
in Article 88, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘2. On all design matters not covered by this Regulation, an EU design court shall apply the applicable national law.’ |
(106) |
Article 89 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 89 Sanctions in actions for infringement 1. Where an EU design court finds that the defendant has infringed or threatened to infringe an EU design, it shall, unless there are special reasons for not doing so, issue an order prohibiting the defendant from proceeding with the acts which infringed or would infringe the EU design. It shall also take such measures in accordance with its national law as are aimed at ensuring that that prohibition is complied with. 2. The EU design court may also apply measures or orders available under the applicable law which it deems appropriate in the circumstances of the case.’ |
(107) |
in Article 90, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: ‘3. An EU design court whose jurisdiction is based on Article 82(1), (2), (3) or (4) of this Regulation shall have jurisdiction to grant provisional measures, including protective measures, which, subject to any necessary procedure for recognition and enforcement pursuant to Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, are applicable in the territory of any Member State. No other court shall have such jurisdiction.’ |
(108) |
Article 93 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 93 Supplementary provisions on the jurisdiction of national courts other than EU design courts 1. Within the Member State whose courts have jurisdiction under Article 79(1), the courts which would have jurisdiction ratione loci and ratione materiae in the case of actions relating to a national design right in that Member State shall have jurisdiction for actions relating to EU designs other than the actions referred to in Article 81. 2. Actions relating to an EU design, other than the actions referred to in Article 81, for which no court has jurisdiction pursuant to Article 79(1) and paragraph 1 of this Article may be heard before the courts of the Member State in which the Office has its seat.’ |
(109) |
in Article 96, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘2. A design protected as an EU design shall also be eligible for protection by copyright as from the date on which the design was created or fixed in any form, provided that the requirements of copyright law are met.’ |
(110) |
Article 97 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 97 Application of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 Unless otherwise provided for in this Title, Articles 142 to 146, Articles 148 to 158, Article 162, and Articles 165 to 177 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 shall apply to the Office with regard to its tasks under this Regulation.’ |
(111) |
Article 98 is amended as follows:
|
(112) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 98a Conferral of implementing powers regarding need and standards of translation The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying:
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(113) |
Article 99 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 99 Publication and entries in the Register 1. All information the publication of which is prescribed by this Regulation or an act adopted pursuant to this Regulation shall be published in all the official languages of the Union. 2. All entries in the Register shall be made in all the official languages of the Union. 3. In cases of doubt, the text in the language of the Office in which the application for the registered EU design was filed shall be authentic. If the application was filed in an official language of the Union other than one of the languages of the Office, the text in the second language indicated by the applicant shall be authentic.’ |
(114) |
Article 100 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 100 Supplementary powers of the Executive Director In addition to the powers conferred upon the Executive Director by Article 157(4), point (o), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the Executive Director shall exercise the powers conferred under Article 36(5), Article 37(1), Article 41(5), Article 42(2), Article 62(2), Article 65(5), Articles 66, 66c and 66e, Article 72(4), Article 72a(3), Article 73, Article 74a(1), Articles 74c and 78, Article 98(7), Article -106aa, Article -106ab(1) and Articles -106ac and -106ad of this Regulation in accordance with the criteria set out in this Regulation and in the acts adopted pursuant to this Regulation.’ |
(115) |
Article 101 is deleted; |
(116) |
Articles 102, 103 and 104 are replaced by the following: ‘Article 102 Competence For taking decisions in connection with the procedures laid down in this Regulation, the following shall be competent:
Article 103 Examiners The examiners shall be responsible for taking decisions on behalf of the Office in relation to an application for a registered EU design. Article 104 The Department in charge of the Register 1. In addition to the powers conferred upon it by Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the Department in charge of the Register shall be responsible for taking decisions in respect of entries in the Register under this Regulation and other decisions required by this Regulation which do not fall within the competence of the examiners or an Invalidity Division. 2. The Department in charge of the Register shall also be responsible for maintaining the list of professional representatives in design matters.’ |
(117) |
in Article 105, the following paragraph is added: ‘3. Decisions relating to costs or to procedures shall be taken by a single member of the Invalidity Division.’ |
(118) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 105a Conferral of implementing powers regarding decisions taken by a single member The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the exact types of decisions that are to be taken by a single member as referred to in Article 105(3). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 109(2).’ |
(119) |
Article 106 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 106 Boards of Appeal In addition to the powers conferred upon it by Article 165 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, the Boards of Appeal shall be responsible for deciding on appeals against decisions of the instances of the Office referred to in Article 102, points (a), (b) and (c) of this Regulation, in connection with the procedures laid down in this Regulation.’ |
(120) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article -106a Delegation of power regarding the Boards of Appeal The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 109a of this Regulation to supplement it by specifying the details concerning the organisation of the Boards of Appeal in proceedings relating to designs under this Regulation where such proceedings require the Boards of Appeal to be organised differently from what is laid down in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 168 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.’ |
(121) |
the following Section is added in Title XI:
Article -106aa Fees and charges and due date 1. The Executive Director shall lay down the amount to be charged for any services rendered by the Office other than those set out in the Annex, as well as the amount to be charged for publications issued by the Office. The amounts of charges shall be set in euro and shall be published in the Official Journal of the Office. The amount of each charge shall not exceed what is necessary to cover the costs of the specific service rendered by the Office. 2. Fees and charges in respect of which the due date is not specified in this Regulation shall be due on the date of receipt of the request for the service for which the fee or the charge is incurred. With the consent of the Budget Committee, the Executive Director may determine which of the services mentioned in the first subparagraph is not to be dependent upon the advance payment of the corresponding fees or charges. Article -106ab Payment of fees and charges 1. Fees and charges due to the Office shall be paid by the methods of payment determined by the Executive Director with the consent of the Budget Committee. The methods of payment determined pursuant to the first subparagraph shall be published in the Official Journal of the Office. All payments shall be made in euro. 2. Payments through means of payment other than those referred to in paragraph 1 shall be considered not to have been made and the amount which has been paid shall be refunded. 3. Payments shall contain the necessary information to enable the Office to establish immediately the purpose of the payment. 4. If the purpose of the payment referred to in paragraph 2 cannot immediately be established, the Office shall require the person making the payment to notify it in writing of that purpose within a certain period. If the person does not comply with the request within that period, the payment shall be considered not to have been made and the amount which has been paid shall be refunded. Article -106ac Deemed date of payment The Executive Director shall establish the date on which payments are to be considered to have been made. Article -106ad Insufficient payments and refund of excess payments 1. A time limit for payment shall be considered to have been observed only if the full amount of the fee or charge has been paid in due time. If the fee or charge is not paid in full, the amount which has been paid shall be refunded after the period for payment has expired. 2. The Office shall, however, in so far as is possible within the time remaining before the end of the period for payment, give the person making the payment the opportunity to pay the amount lacking. 3. With the consent of the Budget Committee, the Executive Director may waive action for the enforced recovery of any sum due where the sum to be recovered is minimal or where such recovery is too uncertain. 4. Where an excessive sum is paid to cover a fee or a charge, the excess shall be refunded.’ |
(122) |
in Article 106d, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: ‘3. The Office shall provide information on international registrations referred to in paragraph 2 in the form of an electronic link to the searchable database of international registrations of designs maintained by the International Bureau.’ |
(123) |
Article 106e is replaced by the following: ‘Article 106e Examination of grounds for refusal 1. Where the Office finds, in the course of carrying out an examination of an international registration, that the design for which protection is sought does not correspond to the definition in Article 3, point (1), of this Regulation, that the design is contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality, or that the design constitutes an improper use of any of the items listed in Article 6ter of the Paris Convention, or of badges, emblems and escutcheons other than those covered by the said Article 6ter and which are of particular public interest in a Member State, it shall send to the International Bureau a notification of refusal not later than six months from the date of publication of the international registration, specifying the grounds for refusal pursuant to Article 12(2) of the Geneva Act. 2. Where the holder of the international registration is obliged to be represented before the Office pursuant to Article 77(2), the notification referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall contain a reference to the obligation of the holder to appoint a representative as referred to in Article 78(1). 3. The Office shall specify a time limit by which the holder of the international registration may renounce the international registration in respect of the Union, limit the international registration in respect of the Union to one or some of the industrial designs or submit observations, and, where appropriate, shall appoint a representative. The period shall start on the day on which the Office issues the notification of refusal. 4. If the holder fails to appoint a representative within the period referred to in paragraph 3, the Office shall refuse the effects of the international registration. 5. Where the holder submits observations that satisfy the Office within the specified period, the Office shall withdraw the refusal and notify the International Bureau in accordance with Article 12(4) of the Geneva Act. Where, pursuant to Article 12(2) of the Geneva Act, the holder does not submit observations that satisfy the Office within the specified period, the Office shall confirm the decision refusing protection for the international registration. That decision shall be subject to appeal in accordance with Articles 66 to 72 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 in conjunction with Article 55(2) of this Regulation. 6. Where the holder renounces the international registration or limits the international registration to one or some of the industrial designs in respect of the Union, the holder shall inform the International Bureau by way of the recording procedure in accordance with Article 16(1), points (iv) and (v), of the Geneva Act.’ |
(124) |
the following article is added in Title XIa: ‘Article 106g Renewals The international registration shall be renewed directly at the International Bureau in compliance with Article 17 of the Geneva Act.’ |
(125) |
Articles 107 and 108 are deleted; |
(126) |
Article 109 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 109 Committee Procedure 1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee on Implementation Rules established by Regulation (EU) 2017/1001. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. 2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.’ |
(127) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 109a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 47b, 53a, 55a, 64a, 65a, 66a, 66d, 66f, 66i, 67c, 78a and -106a shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from 8 December 2024. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 47b, 53a, 55a, 64a, 65a, 66a, 66d, 66f, 66i, 67c, 78a and -106a may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall carry out consultations with experts, including experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 47b, 53a, 55a, 64a, 65a, 66a, 66d, 66f, 66i, 67c, 78a or -106a shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.’ |
(128) |
Article 110 is deleted; |
(129) |
in Article 110a, paragraph 5, the second sentence is deleted; |
(130) |
the following article is inserted: ‘Article 110b Evaluation 1. By 1 January 2030, and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall evaluate the implementation of this Regulation. 2. The Commission shall forward the evaluation report together with its conclusions drawn on the basis of that report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Management Board. The findings of the evaluation shall be made public.’ |
(131) |
in Article 111, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘2. Applications for registered EU designs may be filed at the Office from 1 April 2003.’ |
(132) |
the Annex as set out in Annex I to this Regulation is added. |
Article 2
Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002 is repealed with effect from 1 May 2025.
References to the repealed Regulation shall be construed as references to Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and shall be read in accordance with the correlation table set out in Annex II to this Regulation.
Article 3
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 1 May 2025.
However, Article 1, points (21), (22), (24), (26), (27), (28), (29), (30), (32)(b), (34)(b), (37), (40), (42), (45), (46), (49), (52), (54), (56), (58), (61), (63), (65), (66), (70), (72), (74), (76), (78), (80)(b), (81), (85), (88) in so far as it relates to Article 72(3), points (a), (e), (f) and (m), (90), (98)(b), (111), (113) and (123) shall apply from 1 July 2026.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Strasbourg, 23 October 2024.
For the European Parliament
The President
R. METSOLA
For the Council
The President
ZSIGMOND B. P.
(1) OJ C 184, 25.5.2023, p. 39.
(2) Position of the European Parliament of 14 March 2024 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 10 October 2024.
(3) Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs (OJ L 3, 5.1.2002, p. 1).
(4) Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs (OJ L 289, 28.10.1998, p. 28).
(5) OJ C 205, 20.5.2022, p. 26.
(6) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (OJ L 154, 16.6.2017, p. 1).
(7) Regulation (EU) No 608/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 (OJ L 181, 29.6.2013, p. 15).
(8) Directive (EU) 2024/2823 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2024 on the legal protection of designs (OJ L, 2024/2823, 18.11.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/2823/oj).
(9) Judgment of the Court of Justice of 20 December 2017, Acacia Srl v Pneusgarda Srl and Audi AG and Acacia Srl and Rolando D’Amato v Dr Ing. h.c.F. Porsche AG, joined Cases C-397/16 and C-435/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:992.
(10) OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
(11) Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
(12) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002 of 16 December 2002 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) in respect of the registration of Community designs (OJ L 341, 17.12.2002, p. 54).
(13) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 of 21 October 2002 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs (OJ L 341, 17.12.2002, p. 28).
(14) Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).
ANNEX I
‘ANNEX
Amounts of fees as referred to in Article -106aa(1)
The fees to be paid to the Office under this Regulation shall be as follows (in EUR):
1. |
Application fee referred to in Article 36(4):
|
2. |
Individual designation fee for an international registration referred to in Article 106c:
|
3. |
Fee for deferment of publication referred to in Article 36(4):
|
4. |
Additional application fee in respect of each additional design included in a multiple application referred to in Article 37(2):
|
5. |
Additional fee for deferment of publication in respect of each additional design included in a multiple application that is subject to deferment of publication referred to in Article 37(2):
|
6. |
Renewal fee referred to in Article 50d(1), (3) and (9):
|
7. |
Individual renewal fee for an international registration referred to in Article 106c:
|
8. |
Fee for late payment of the renewal fee referred to in Article 50d(3):
|
9. |
Fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity referred to in Article 52(2):
|
10. |
Fee for continuation of proceedings referred to in Article 67a(1):
|
11. |
Fee for restitutio in integrum referred to in Article 67(3):
|
12. |
Fee for the registration of a licence or another right in respect of a registered EU design referred to in Article 32a(1) and (2) (referred to in Article 24(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 before 1 July 2026), or for the registration of a licence or another right in respect of an application for an EU design referred to in Article 32a(1) and (2) and Article 34 (referred to in Article 24(1) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 before 1 July 2026:
up to a maximum of EUR 1 000 where multiple requests are submitted in the same application for registration of a licence or another right or at the same time. |
13. |
Fee for the alteration of a registered EU design referred to in Article 50e(3):
|
14. |
Fee for review of the determination of the procedural costs to be refunded referred to in Article 70(7) (referred to in Article 79(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 before 1 July 2026):
|
15. |
Appeal fee referred to in Article 68(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, which also applies to appeals under this Regulation pursuant to Article 55(2) (referred to in Article 57 of this Regulation before 1 July 2026):
|
ANNEX II
Correlation table
Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002 |
Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 |
Article 1 |
— |
Article 2 |
Article -106aa(1) |
Article 3 |
Article -106aa(1) |
Article 4 |
Article -106aa(2) |
Article 5 |
Article -106ab(1) |
Article 6 |
Article -106ab(3) and (4) |
Article 7 |
Article -106ac |
Article 8 |
Article -106ad(1) and (2) |
Article 9 |
Article -106ad(3) and (4) |
Annex |
Annex |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2822/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)