Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 32005R1553

    Regulation (EC) No 1553/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) (Text with EEA relevance)

    OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 6–8 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    This document has been published in a special edition(s) (BG, RO, HR)

    Legal status of the document No longer in force, Date of end of validity: 31/12/2020; Implicitly repealed by 32019R1700

    ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2005/1553/oj

    30.9.2005   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    L 255/6


    REGULATION (EC) No 1553/2005 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

    of 7 September 2005

    amending Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC)

    (Text with EEA relevance)

    THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

    Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 285 thereof,

    Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

    Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty (1),

    Whereas:

    (1)

    Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) (2), establishes a common framework for the systematic production of Community statistics on income and living conditions, encompassing comparable and timely cross-sectional and longitudinal data on income and on the level and composition of poverty and social exclusion at national and European levels.

    (2)

    As a result of the accession of new Member States to the European Union on 1 May 2004, there is a need to extend Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003, since that Annex sets out for each Member State the minimum effective sample sizes required under the EU-SILC scheme.

    (3)

    Furthermore, it appears that most of the new Member States, and several of the existing Member States, need additional time to adapt their systems to the harmonised methods and definitions used to compile Community statistics.

    (4)

    Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly,

    HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

    Article 1

    Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 is hereby amended as follows:

    1.

    Article 4(2) shall be replaced by the following:

    ‘2.   By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the Czech Republic, Germany, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia and the United Kingdom may start the annual cross-sectional and longitudinal data collection in 2005.

    This authorisation is subject to the condition that those Member States shall supply comparable data for the year 2004 for the cross-sectional common European Union indicators which were adopted by the Council before 1 January 2003 in the context of the open method of coordination and which can be derived on the basis of the EU-SILC instrument.’;

    2.

    in Article 13, the following paragraphs shall be added:

    ‘4.   By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Estonia shall receive a financial contribution from the Community towards the cost of the work involved for the four years of data collection from 2005.

    5.   The financing for the year 2007 is yet to be ensured by a future Community programme.’;

    3.

    Annex II shall be replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

    Article 2

    This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

    This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

    Done at Strasbourg, 7 September 2005.

    For the European Parliament

    The President

    J. BORRELL FONTELLES

    For the Council

    The President

    C. CLARKE


    (1)  Opinion of the European Parliament of 10 May 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Council Decision of 12 July 2005.

    (2)   OJ L 165, 3.7.2003, p. 1.


    ANNEX

    ‘ANNEX II

    MINIMUM EFFECTIVE SAMPLE SIZES

     

    Households

    Persons aged 16 or over to be interviewed

    Cross-sectional

    Longitudinal

    Cross-sectional

    Longitudinal

    1

    2

    3

    4

    EU Member States

    Belgium

    4 750

    3 500

    8 750

    6 500

    Czech Republic

    4 750

    3 500

    10 000

    7 500

    Denmark

    4 250

    3 250

    7 250

    5 500

    Germany

    8 250

    6 000

    14 500

    10 500

    Estonia

    3 500

    2 750

    7 750

    5 750

    Greece

    4 750

    3 500

    10 000

    7 250

    Spain

    6 500

    5 000

    16 000

    12 250

    France

    7 250

    5 500

    13 500

    10 250

    Ireland

    3 750

    2 750

    8 000

    6 000

    Italy

    7 250

    5 500

    15 500

    11 750

    Cyprus

    3 250

    2 500

    7 500

    5 500

    Latvia

    3 750

    2 750

    7 650

    5 600

    Lithuania

    4 000

    3 000

    9 000

    6 750

    Luxembourg

    3 250

    2 500

    6 500

    5 000

    Hungary

    4 750

    3 500

    10 250

    7 750

    Malta

    3 000

    2 250

    7 000

    5 250

    Netherlands

    5 000

    3 750

    8 750

    6 500

    Austria

    4 500

    3 250

    8 750

    6 250

    Poland

    6 000

    4 500

    15 000

    11 250

    Portugal

    4 500

    3 250

    10 500

    7 500

    Slovenia

    3 750

    2 750

    9 000

    6 750

    Slovakia

    4 250

    3 250

    11 000

    8 250

    Finland

    4 000

    3 000

    6 750

    5 000

    Sweden

    4 500

    3 500

    7 500

    5 750

    United Kingdom

    7 500

    5 750

    13 750

    10 500

    Total for EU Member States

    121 000

    90 750

    250 150

    186 850

    Iceland

    2 250

    1 700

    3 750

    2 800

    Norway

    3 750

    2 750

    6 250

    4 650

    Total including Iceland and Norway

    127 000

    95 200

    260 150

    194 300

    NB: The reference is to the effective sample size, which is the size required if the survey were based on simple random sampling (design effect in relation to the “risk of poverty rate” variable = 1,0). The actual sample sizes will have to be larger to the extent that the design effects exceed 1,0 and to compensate for all kinds of non-response. Furthermore, the sample size refers to the number of valid households which are households for which, and for all members of which, all or nearly all the required information has been obtained’


    Top