This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62026CN0132
Case C-132/26, Camille: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 25 February 2026 – Camille ASBL v RT
Case C-132/26, Camille: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 25 February 2026 – Camille ASBL v RT
Case C-132/26, Camille: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 25 February 2026 – Camille ASBL v RT
OJ C, C/2026/3042, 15.6.2026, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/3042/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2026/3042 |
15.6.2026 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 25 February 2026 – Camille ASBL v RT
(Case C-132/26, Camille)
(C/2026/3042)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Cour du travail de Mons
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Camille ASBL
Defendant: RT
Questions referred
|
1. |
Must Article 4 of Regulation No 883/2004/EC (1), Article 24 of Directive 2004/38/EC (2) and Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 (3), which enshrine the principle of equal treatment of EU citizens, be interpreted as precluding national legislation which makes the grant of family allowances subject to the condition that the child concerned, being an EU citizen, must hold a residence permit in the competent Member State in which he or she actually resides with his or her parents, thereby excluding from the grant of those allowances the parent of that child, who is also a national of a Member State of the European Union but does not hold (or no longer holds) such a residence permit, even though he or she actually resides in that Member State and pursues an economic activity there (in this case as a paid employee) and thereby contributes to the funding of that Member State’s social policies? |
|
2. |
In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative, is such unequal treatment, which is contrary to Article 4 of Regulation No 883/2004/EC, Article 24 of Directive 2004/38/EC and Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011, adequately corrected by the fact that another provision of the legislation in question exempts the child from the requirement to hold a residence permit, thereby enabling the same parent to receive family allowances for a maximum of six months from the parent’s entry into the territory of the Member State concerned? |
(1) Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1)?
(2) Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77).
(3) Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/3042/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)