This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62025CB0502
Case C-502/25, YETTEL BULGARIA II: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – YETTEL BULGARIA EAD v FB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-502/25, YETTEL BULGARIA II: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – YETTEL BULGARIA EAD v FB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Case C-502/25, YETTEL BULGARIA II: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – YETTEL BULGARIA EAD v FB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C, C/2026/1185, 9.3.2026, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/1185/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2026/1185 |
9.3.2026 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – ‘YETTEL BULGARIA’ EAD v FB
(Case C-502/25, (1) YETTEL BULGARIA II)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2026/1185)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Sofiyski rayonen sad
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: ‘YETTEL BULGARIA’ EAD
Defendant: FB
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Sofia District Court, Bulgaria), made by decision of 18 July 2025, is manifestly inadmissible.
(1) Date lodged: 18/7/2025
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/1185/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)