1.

Are Articles 1(6) and 3(1) and (2) of Directive 2000/31/EC (1) to be interpreted as precluding a Member State’s national provisions designed to safeguard diversity of opinion which impose requirements on providers of media intermediary services, that is to say providers of information society services which include journalistic-editorial content from third parties which is aggregated, selected and presented in a generally accessible form without being consolidated into a single package, to ensure the accessibility of certain transparency information in their applications, even if the providers of media intermediary services are established in another Member State but the media intermediary services which they provide are also intended for use in the Member State which has enacted the provisions?

2.

Is Article 27 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 (2) to be interpreted as entirely or partly precluding a Member State’s national provisions designed to safeguard diversity of opinion which impose requirements on providers of media intermediary services, that is to say providers of information society services which include journalistic-editorial content from third parties which is aggregated, selected and presented in a generally accessible form without being consolidated into a single package, to ensure the accessibility of certain transparency information in their applications?