Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62025TN0484

Case T-484/25: Action brought on 21 July 2025 – Mazk Management v Council

OJ C, C/2025/4893, 15.9.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4893/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4893/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series


C/2025/4893

15.9.2025

Action brought on 21 July 2025 – Mazk Management v Council

(Case T-484/25)

(C/2025/4893)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Mazk Management LLC (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: H. Koch, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Annul the listing of the marine vessel MT Kupava (IMO 9749154) at point 169 in Annex XLII to Council Regulation (EU) [2025/932] of 20 May 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014; (1)

Treat the application as particularly urgent;

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law

The MT Kupava (IMO 9749154) was listed without any valid justification. In particular, no facts were put forward that could justify a listing pursuant to Article 3s of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014. (2) This is contrary to the settled case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

2.

Second plea in law

The first listing criterion under Article 3s (transport [of] crude oil or petroleum products) has been neither established nor proved. There is nothing in the file that would support the finding that the MT Kupava transports crude oil or petroleum products.

3.

Third plea in law

The second criterion under Article 3s (practising irregular and high-risk shipping practices) also does not apply. There is no insurance with a P&I Club that is a member of the International Group of P&I Clubs. The defendant’s findings in that regard do not reflect International Maritime Organisation General Assembly resolution A.1192(33), which merely requires that the vessel maintain adequate liability insurance, but not that this must be with the International Group. The vessel has valid proof of insurance with the renowned Russian insurance company Ingosstrakh.


(1)  Council Regulation (EU) 2025/932 of 20 May 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 2025/932).

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4893/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


Top