Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62025CN0195

Case C-195/25, Framholm: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Göteborg, migrationsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 11 March 2025 – AA, BA, CA, DA, EA, FA v Migrationsverket

OJ C, C/2025/2651, 19.5.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2651/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2651/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/2651

19.5.2025

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Göteborg, migrationsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 11 March 2025 – AA, BA, CA, DA, EA, FA v Migrationsverket

(Case C-195/25, Framholm)  (1)

(C/2025/2651)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Förvaltningsrätten i Göteborg, migrationsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: AA, BA, CA, DA, EA, FA

Defendant: Migrationsverket

Questions referred

1.

Are Directive 2011/95/EU (2) and Directive 2013/32/EU (3) applicable to applications for a grant of protection status following the granting of temporary protection under Directive 2001/55? (4)

2.

(a)

Must Articles 17(1) and 19(2) of Directive 2001/55/EC be interpreted as meaning that the possibility of making an ‘application for asylum’ refers to the possibility of making an application for refugee status and of making an application for subsidiary protection status and of having such an application examined in the light of Directive 2011/95 and Directive 2013/32?

(b)

Is Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/55 to be interpreted as meaning that temporary protection under that directive precludes the recognition of subsidiary protection status under Directive 2011/95 for persons eligible for or enjoying temporary protection under the first directive?

3.

If Articles 17(1) and 19(2) of Directive 2001/55 also cover the right to apply for subsidiary protection status under the Directive 2011/95, are those articles, in conjunction with Article 10(2) of Directive 2013/32, sufficiently clear and precise to have direct effect?

4.

Is national legislation, such as the Swedish rules in Paragraph 5 of Chapter 21 of the utlänningslagen (2005:716) (Law on foreign nationals (2005:716)), which restricts the right to apply for a grant of refugee status or of alternative protection status so that it makes provision solely for applications for a grant of refugee status, compatible with EU law?

(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (OJ 2011 L 337, p. 9).

(3)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).

(4)  Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof (OJ 2001 L 212, p. 12).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2651/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top