Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62025TN0152

Case T-152/25: Action brought on 7 March 2025 – IA v Commission

OJ C, C/2025/2231, 22.4.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2231/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2231/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series


C/2025/2231

22.4.2025

Action brought on 7 March 2025 – IA v Commission

(Case T-152/25)

(C/2025/2231)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: IA (represented by: L. Levi and M. Itani, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare the present action to be admissible and well-founded;

annul the decision set out in the applicant’s pay slip for June 2024 determining annual travel expenses based on the distance between his place of employment and his place of origin in Algiers (Algeria) only as from 2024 and not also in respect of the years 2014 to 2023;

in so far as is necessary, annul the decision of 28 November 2024 rejecting the complaint;

order the defendant to reimburse the applicant’s annual travel expenses based on the distance between his place of employment and his place of origin in respect of the years 2014 to 2023, that amount to be increased by default interest at the rate set by the European Central Bank for main refinancing operations;

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law which are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-136/25, HV v EESC.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2231/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


Top