This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TA0171
Case T-171/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – DH v Commission (Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Social security – Article 101(3) of the CEOS – Total and permanent invalidity – Refusal to recognise the invalidity as arising from an occupational disease – Obligation to state reasons – Medical assessments)
Case T-171/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – DH v Commission (Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Social security – Article 101(3) of the CEOS – Total and permanent invalidity – Refusal to recognise the invalidity as arising from an occupational disease – Obligation to state reasons – Medical assessments)
Case T-171/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – DH v Commission (Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Social security – Article 101(3) of the CEOS – Total and permanent invalidity – Refusal to recognise the invalidity as arising from an occupational disease – Obligation to state reasons – Medical assessments)
OJ C, C/2025/1764, 31.3.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1764/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2025/1764 |
31.3.2025 |
Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – DH v Commission
(Case T-171/24) (1)
(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Social security - Article 101(3) of the CEOS - Total and permanent invalidity - Refusal to recognise the invalidity as arising from an occupational disease - Obligation to state reasons - Medical assessments)
(C/2025/1764)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: DH (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 15 February 2023 stating that the invalidity from which she suffers is not of occupational origin and of the decision of 20 December 2023 rejecting the complaint that she filed against the contested decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders DH to pay the costs. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1764/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)