Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62025TN0086

Case T-86/25: Action brought on 6 February 2025 – Taylor v Council

OJ C, C/2025/1666, 24.3.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1666/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1666/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/1666

24.3.2025

Action brought on 6 February 2025 – Taylor v Council

(Case T-86/25)

(C/2025/1666)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Maurice Taylor (Vessy, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Carreri, F. Donati and M. Dal Prà, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul, first, Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/3182 of 16 December 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (1) and, second, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/3183 of 16 December 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No. 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (2), in so far as these acts concern the applicant; and

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law, alleging violation of the right to defence and of the duty to state reasons for the inclusion of the applicant in the list.

2.

Second plea in law, alleging an error of assessment on the ground that the reasons for the sanctions imposed on the applicant were incorrect and, in any event, not established.

3.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality.

(1)  OJ L, 2024/3182.

(2)  OJ L, 2024/3183.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1666/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top