This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CA0766
Case C-766/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg and Others (Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appeal brought by a party against which an order was made by default and which has made an application to set aside to the General Court – Article 176(1) and Article 178 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Inadmissibility – Arbitration clause – Article 272 TFEU – Insurance contract concluded by the European Parliament – Exclusion clause in respect of damage relating directly or indirectly to flooding – Scope)
Case C-766/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg and Others (Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appeal brought by a party against which an order was made by default and which has made an application to set aside to the General Court – Article 176(1) and Article 178 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Inadmissibility – Arbitration clause – Article 272 TFEU – Insurance contract concluded by the European Parliament – Exclusion clause in respect of damage relating directly or indirectly to flooding – Scope)
Case C-766/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg and Others (Appeal – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance – Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside – Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment – Conditions – Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance – Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cross-appeal brought by a party against which an order was made by default and which has made an application to set aside to the General Court – Article 176(1) and Article 178 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Inadmissibility – Arbitration clause – Article 272 TFEU – Insurance contract concluded by the European Parliament – Exclusion clause in respect of damage relating directly or indirectly to flooding – Scope)
OJ C, C/2025/1508, 17.3.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1508/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2025/1508 |
17.3.2025 |
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg and Others
(Case C-766/21 P) (1)
(Appeal - Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - More than one defendant in the proceedings at first instance - Judgment in default against one of those defendants which is the subject of an application before the General Court of the European Union to have it set aside - Admissibility of the appeal brought against that judgment - Conditions - Article 41 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Admissibility of the response to an appeal submitted by a party against which an order was made by default at first instance - Article 172 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Cross-appeal brought by a party against which an order was made by default and which has made an application to set aside to the General Court - Article 176(1) and Article 178 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Inadmissibility - Arbitration clause - Article 272 TFEU - Insurance contract concluded by the European Parliament - Exclusion clause in respect of damage relating directly or indirectly to flooding - Scope)
(C/2025/1508)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Paladini and B. Schäfer, and subsequently by A. Caiola and E. Paladini, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA, Bâloise Assurances Luxembourg SA, La Luxembourgeoise SA, Nationale-Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij NV (represented by: C. Collarini and S. Denu, avocats)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders the European Parliament, Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA, Bâloise Assurances Luxembourg SA, La Luxembourgeoise SA. and Nationale-Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij NV to pay their own costs relating to the main appeal; |
|
3. |
Orders Nationale-Nederlanden Schadeverzekering Maatschappij NV to pay the costs relating to the cross-appeal. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1508/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)