Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN1130

Case T-1130/23: Action brought on 1 December 2023 — Smart Kid v Commission

OJ C, C/2024/968, 29.1.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/968/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/968/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2024/968

29.1.2024

Action brought on 1 December 2023 — Smart Kid v Commission

(Case T-1130/23)

(C/2024/968)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Smart Kid S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: Z. Kiedacz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the implied decision of the European Commission of 22 September 2023 adopted in the case examined by the European Commission under ref. EASE 2023/2923 rejecting Smart Kid’s request of 17 May 2023 for access to public documents, submitted on the basis of Regulation No 1049/2001;

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law alleging infringement of Article 15(3) TFEU in conjunction with Articles 1 and 2 of Regulation No 1049/2001. (1)

—

Article 15(3) TFEU in conjunction with Articles 1 and 2 of Regulation No 1049/2001 provide for the right of any legal person having its registered office in a Member State to access documents of the Union’s bodies, in accordance with the general principles and limits governing the exercise of that right, which are set out in that regulation. The adoption by the European Commission of the implied rejection decision for the purposes of Article 8(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001, manifestly infringes that right.

2.

Second plea in law alleging that the Commission infringed the obligation to state reasons.

—

As is apparent from Article 296(2) TFEU, legal acts adopted by EU institutions must state the reasons on which they are based. The statement of reasons must be appropriate to the act at issue and must disclose in a clear and unequivocal fashion the reasoning followed by the institution which adopted the act. As regards the Commission’s adoption of the implied rejection decision for the purposes of Article 8(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001, that decision was not accompanied by any reasons, which manifestly infringes the obligation to state reasons.

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/968/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top