Action brought on 19 September 2024 – Pech v Commission

(Case T-485/24)

(C/2024/6449)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Laurent Pech (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Zatschler, Senior Counsel, M. Delargy and A. Bateman, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law.

Single plea in law, alleging failure to comply with the duty to state reasons provided for by Article 296 TFEU.

The Commission failed to reply within the applicable deadline to the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to documents, giving rise to a deemed refusal pursuant to Article 8(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001. Such a deemed refusal of access entails, by definition, an absolute lack of reasoning and therefore does not satisfy the duty to state reasons which Article 296 TFEU imposes on EU institutions.

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).