Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 52024XG06322

Council conclusions on the revised EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes

ST/14269/2024/INIT

OJ C, C/2024/6322, 18.10.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6322/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6322/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series


C/2024/6322

18.10.2024

Council conclusions

on the revised EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes

(C/2024/6322)

The Council of the European Union,

1.   

UNDERLINES the importance of promoting and strengthening tax good governance standards, including in the area of fair taxation and tax transparency, and of fighting against tax fraud, evasion and avoidance, both at the EU level and globally;

2.   

APPRECIATES the continuous productive cooperation on tax matters between the Code of Conduct Group on Business Taxation (‘Code of Conduct Group’) and most jurisdictions around the world;

3.   

WELCOMES the progress in the relevant jurisdictions through the active steps taken by the agreed deadlines, in particular with regard to the exchange of information on request, the automatic exchange of financial account information and harmful tax regimes; WELCOMES the recent promising steps taken by some jurisdictions that have been listed for an extended period of time and ENCOURAGES these jurisdictions to pursue these efforts with a view to future updates of the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes;

4.   

REGRETS that some jurisdictions remain non-cooperative for tax purposes and that a number of jurisdictions failed to fulfil their commitments to the Code of Conduct Group, including on the automatic exchange of financial account information (criterion 1.1), the exchange of information on request (criterion 1.2), on the reform of harmful tax regimes under criterion 2.1, or the enforcement of the economic substance requirements under criterion 2.2; INVITES these jurisdictions to engage with the Code of Conduct Group in order to resolve the remaining issues;

5.   

REGRETS that Türkiye has not made any progress with one Member State on the effective automatic exchange of information; REITERATES its call on Türkiye to begin the outstanding automatic information exchange relationships with one Member State and to fully comply with the requirements set in the conclusions of the Ecofin Council of 22 February 2021, 5 October 2021, 24 February 2022, 4 October 2022, 14 February 2023, 17 October 2023 and 20 February 2024; REITERATES that the effective automatic exchange of information with all Member States is a condition for Türkiye to fulfil criterion 1.1 of the EU list; INVITES the Group to inform the Council about developments in this regard and to continue addressing the outstanding issues where no progress has been made;

6.   

APPROVES the Code of Conduct Group Report set out in doc. ST 13890/24 (1);

7.   

APPROVES accordingly the revised EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes set out in Annex I;

8.   

ENDORSES the state of play with respect to commitments taken by cooperative jurisdictions to implement tax good governance standards set out in Annex II.


(1)   https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13890-2024-INIT/en/pdf


ANNEX I

THE EU LIST OF NON-COOPERATIVE JURISDICTIONS FOR TAX PURPOSES

1.   American Samoa

American Samoa does not apply any automatic exchange of financial information, has not signed and ratified, including through the jurisdiction they are dependent on, the OECD Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance as amended, has not committed to applying the minimum standards on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS minimum standards) and has not committed to addressing these issues.

2.   Anguilla

Anguilla does not have a rating of at least ‘Largely Compliant’ by the Global Forum for exchange of information on request. Anguilla also facilitates offshore structures and arrangements aimed at attracting profits without real economic substance by failing to take all necessary actions to ensure the effective implementation of substance requirements under criterion 2.2.

3.   Fiji

Fiji has not signed and ratified the OECD Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance as amended, has harmful preferential tax regimes (Exporting Companies, Income Communication Technology (ICT) Incentive, and has not resolved these issues yet.

4.   Guam

Guam does not apply any automatic exchange of financial information, has not signed and ratified, including through the jurisdiction they are dependent on, the OECD Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance as amended, has not committed to apply the BEPS minimum standards and has not committed to addressing these issues.

5.   Palau

Palau has not signed and ratified the OECD Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance as amended, and has not resolved this issue yet.

6.   Panama

Panama does not have a rating of at least ‘Largely Compliant’ by the Global Forum for exchange of information on request, has a harmful foreign source income exemption regime and has not resolved these issues yet.

7.   Russian Federation

The Russian Federation has a harmful preferential tax regime (International Holding Companies) and has not resolved this issue.

8.   Samoa

Samoa has a harmful preferential tax regime (Offshore Business) and has not resolved this issue yet.

9.   Trinidad and Tobago

Trinidad and Tobago does not have a rating of at least ‘Largely Compliant’ by the Global Forum for exchange of information on request, has not signed and ratified the OECD Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance as amended, has harmful preferential tax regimes (Free Zones), does not implement the BEPS minimum standard on country-by-country reporting and has not resolved these issues yet.

Trinidad and Tobago has also committed to addressing the Global Forum recommendations with regard to automatic exchange of information (criterion 1.1) in due time, so as to achieve determinations of at least ‘In place, but needs improvement’ on core requirements 1 and 2 in the Global Forum peer review report in the autumn of 2024.

10.   US Virgin Islands

US Virgin Islands does not apply any automatic exchange of financial information, has not signed and ratified, including through the jurisdiction they are dependent on, the OECD Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance as amended, has harmful preferential tax regimes (Economic Development Programme, Exempt companies, International Banking Center Regulatory Act), has not committed to apply the BEPS minimum standards and has not committed to addressing these issues.

11.   Vanuatu

Vanuatu facilitates offshore structures and arrangements aimed at attracting profits without real economic substance and has not resolved this issue yet.

Vanuatu is waiting for a supplementary review by the Global Forum in relation to exchange of information on request.


ANNEX II

STATE OF PLAY OF THE COOPERATION WITH THE EU WITH RESPECT TO COMMITMENTS TAKEN BY COOPERATIVE JURISDICTIONS TO IMPLEMENT TAX GOOD GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES

1.   Transparency

1.1   Automatic exchange of information

The following jurisdiction is expected to effectively exchange information with all 27 Member States according to the timeline referred to in paragraph 6 of the Council conclusions of 22 February 2021, paragraph 4 of the Council conclusions of 5 October 2021, paragraph 4 of the Council conclusions of 24 February 2022, paragraph 4 of the Council conclusions of 4 October 2022, paragraph 7 of the Council conclusions of 14 February 2023, paragraph 7 of the Council conclusions of 17 October 2023, and paragraph 5 of the Council conclusions of 26 February 2024:

Türkiye

The following jurisdictions committed to address the Global Forum recommendations with regard to automatic exchange of information in due time, so as to achieve determinations of at least ‘In place, but needs improvement’ on core requirements 1 and 2 in the Global Forum peer review report in the autumn of 2024:

Costa Rica and Curaçao

1.2   Membership of the Global Forum and satisfactory rating in relation to exchange of information on request

The following jurisdictions are waiting for a supplementary review by the Global Forum:

Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, British Virgin Islands and Seychelles

2.   Fair Taxation

2.1   Existence of harmful tax regimes

The following jurisdictions, which committed to amending or abolishing a preferential tax regimes in the scope of the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices (FHTP) by 31 December 2023, is awaiting a final assessments by the FHTP:

Eswatini (Special economic zone)

3.   Prevention of base erosion and profit shifting

3.2   Implementation of the CbCR minimum standard (BEPS Action 13)

The following jurisdiction committed to implement the CbCR minimum standard and to activate CbCR exchange relationships with all EU Member States, and was granted until 31 December 2024 to sign the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on CbCR and until 31 January 2025 to take the necessary steps to activate CbCR exchange relationships with all EU Member States:

Vietnam


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6322/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


Top