This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TN0459
Case T-459/24: Action brought on 3 September 2024 – Trotsenko v Council
Case T-459/24: Action brought on 3 September 2024 – Trotsenko v Council
Case T-459/24: Action brought on 3 September 2024 – Trotsenko v Council
OJ C, C/2024/5977, , ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5977/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2024/5977 |
14.10.2024 |
Action brought on 3 September 2024 – Trotsenko v Council
(Case T-459/24)
(C/2024/5977)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Roman Trotsenko (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: C. Zatschler, SC, and A. Beauchemin, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The Applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
Declare, pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, Article 2(1)(g) of Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Article 3(1)(g) of Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 inapplicable to the Applicant insofar as the Council argues that it applies to him; |
|
— |
Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1738 of 24 June 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine in so far as it applies to the Applicant; |
|
— |
Annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1746 of 24 June 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine in so far as it applies to the Applicant; |
|
— |
Order the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Applicant. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the Applicant relies on five pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging a breach of the rights of defence. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging a violation of the right to effective judicial protection and the obligation to state reasons. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging the illegality of modified criterion (g). |
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging errors of assessment. |
|
5. |
Fifth plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle of proportionality and fundamental rights. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5977/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)