This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TA0200
Case T-200/24: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2024 – Wonderbox v EUIPO – Swile (Wonderbox) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Wonderbox – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No independent subcategory)
Case T-200/24: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2024 – Wonderbox v EUIPO – Swile (Wonderbox) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Wonderbox – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No independent subcategory)
Case T-200/24: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2024 – Wonderbox v EUIPO – Swile (Wonderbox) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Wonderbox – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No independent subcategory)
OJ C, C/2025/566, 3.2.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/566/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2025/566 |
3.2.2025 |
Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2024 – Wonderbox v EUIPO – Swile (Wonderbox)
(Case T-200/24) (1)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark Wonderbox - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Lack of genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - No independent subcategory)
(C/2025/566)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Wonderbox (Paris, France) (represented by: O. Klimis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Swile (Montpellier, France)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 February 2024 (Case R 776/2023-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/566/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)