Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024TN0387

Case T-387/24: Action brought on 26 July 2024 – Makhlouf v Council

OJ C, C/2024/5645, 30.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5645/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5645/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/5645

30.9.2024

Action brought on 26 July 2024 – Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-387/24)

(C/2024/5645)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Sara Makhlouf (Latakia, Syria) (represented by: G. Karouni, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul, in so far as those acts concern the applicant,

—

Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1510 (1) of 27 May 2024 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria;

—

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1517 (2) of 27 May 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria;

—

order the Council to pay EUR 10 000 in damages to compensate all forms of loss;

—

order the unsuccessful party, pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, to pay the costs;

—

order the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, supporting evidence of which can be shown during the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-384/24, Sharif v Council.

(1)  OJ L 2024/1510.

(2)  OJ L 2024/1517.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5645/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top