Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024TN0402

Case T-402/24: Action brought on 2 August 2024 – Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists v EUIPO – Grande Vitae (VITAE)

OJ C, C/2024/5428, 16.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5428/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5428/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/5428

16.9.2024

Action brought on 2 August 2024 – Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists v EUIPO – Grande Vitae (VITAE)

(Case T-402/24)

(C/2024/5428)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU (Logroño, Spain) (represented by: L. Broschat García and L. Polo Flores, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Grande Vitae GmbH (Delmenhorst, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark VITAE – European Union trade mark No 1 769 314

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 June 2024 in Case R 1156/2023-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO to cancel the trade mark at issue due to lack of genuine use;

—

order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court, as well as those of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 19 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5428/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top