Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62024TN0370

Case T-370/24: Action brought on 22 July 2024 – EP v Parliament

OJ C, C/2024/5425, 16.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5425/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5425/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series


C/2024/5425

16.9.2024

Action brought on 22 July 2024 – EP v Parliament

(Case T-370/24)

(C/2024/5425)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: EP (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the Parliament of 4 October 2023 by which the applicant was not confirmed in her functions as head of unit;

annul the decision of the Secretary-General of 23 October 2023 approving the transfer of the applicant to a different unit;

in so far as necessary, annul the decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint, delivered on 17 April 2024 by the President of the Parliament;

order the Parliament to compensate the applicant for the non-material harm caused;

order the Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to be heard.

3.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to state reasons.

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty of care.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5425/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


Top