Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024TN0381

Case T-381/24: Action brought on 26 July 2024 – Frutaria Innovation v EUIPO – Schneider (Frutaria.)

OJ C, C/2024/5330, 9.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5330/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5330/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/5330

9.9.2024

Action brought on 26 July 2024 – Frutaria Innovation v EUIPO – Schneider (Frutaria.)

(Case T-381/24)

(C/2024/5330)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Frutaria Innovation SL (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: C. Anadón Giménez and J. Learte Álvarez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Markus Schneider (Bonn, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Frutaria. – European Union trade mark No 5 922 885

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 May 2024 in Case R 1377/2023-2 as corrected by corrigendum of 17 July 2024

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision to the extent the trade mark at issue was declared invalid;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—

Infringement of Article 59(2) in conjunction with Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5330/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top