Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024TN0292

Case T-292/24: Action brought on 4 June 2024 – Beauty Brands Concept v EUIPO – dm-drogerie markt (EVELINE PROFESSIONAL)

OJ C, C/2024/4341, 15.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4341/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4341/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/4341

15.7.2024

Action brought on 4 June 2024 – Beauty Brands Concept v EUIPO – dm-drogerie markt (EVELINE PROFESSIONAL)

(Case T-292/24)

(C/2024/4341)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Beauty Brands Concept sp. z o. o. (Lesznowola, Poland) (represented by: S. Gogulski and M. Stępkowski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark EVELINE PROFESSIONAL – Application for registration No 17 981 948

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2024 in Case R 1086/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order the EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant, including those incurred in the proceedings before the EUIPO.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council read in conjunction with Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4341/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top