This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TN0273
Case T-273/24: Action brought on 23 May 2024 – Ezubov v Council
Case T-273/24: Action brought on 23 May 2024 – Ezubov v Council
Case T-273/24: Action brought on 23 May 2024 – Ezubov v Council
OJ C, C/2024/4097, 8.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4097/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2024/4097 |
8.7.2024 |
Action brought on 23 May 2024 – Ezubov v Council
(Case T-273/24)
(C/2024/4097)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Pavel Ezubov (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: D. Rovetta, M. Campa and V. Villante, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/847 of 12 March 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine; (1) |
|
— |
annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/849 of 12 March 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, (2) and |
|
— |
order the Council to bear the costs of the present proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons, of Article 296 of the TFEU and of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - breach of the right to effective judicial protection and of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging unlawfulness of the new listing criterion in Articles 1(1)(e) and 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014, introduced by the June 2023 Acts - plea of illegality under Article 277 TFEU. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment – failure to discharge the burden of proof – in Articles 1(1)(e) and 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP and Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) no 269/2014, both concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. |
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of proportionality and the applicant’s fundamental rights; breach of the applicant’s fundamental rights to property and freedom to conduct business; breach of Article 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. |
(1) OJ L, 2024/847.
(2) OJ L, 2024/849.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4097/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)