Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62024CN0097

Case C-97/24, The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court (Ireland) made on 6 February 2024 – S.A., R.J. v The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Ireland, The Attorney General

OJ C, C/2024/3309, 3.6.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3309/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3309/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series


C/2024/3309

3.6.2024

Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court (Ireland) made on 6 February 2024 – S.A., R.J. v The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Ireland, The Attorney General

(Case C-97/24, The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth)

(C/2024/3309)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: S.A. and R.J.

Defendants: The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Ireland and the Attorney General

Questions referred

1.

Where “force majeure” is not found as a defence in a Directive or implementing Regulations in issue, is such a defence nonetheless available as a defence to a Francovich (1) damages claim for a breach of an EU law obligation that confers rights on individuals which derive from the fundamental right to human dignity contained in Article 1 of the Charter (whether as a defence within the second limb of the Brasserie du Pêcheur/Factortame (2) test or otherwise)?

2.

If the answer to question (1) is “yes”, what are the parameters and proper scope of that force majeure defence?


(1)  ECLI:EU:C:1991:428.

(2)  ECLI:EU:C:1996:79.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3309/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


Top