This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TN0144
Case T-144/24: Action brought on 8 March 2024 – Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen v EUIPO – Pürschel (BIENENBEISSER)
Case T-144/24: Action brought on 8 March 2024 – Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen v EUIPO – Pürschel (BIENENBEISSER)
Case T-144/24: Action brought on 8 March 2024 – Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen v EUIPO – Pürschel (BIENENBEISSER)
OJ C, C/2024/2787, 29.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2787/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2024/2787 |
29.4.2024 |
Action brought on 8 March 2024 – Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen v EUIPO – Pürschel (BIENENBEISSER)
(Case T-144/24)
(C/2024/2787)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Bouwbenodigdheden Hoogeveen BV (Hoogeveen, Netherlands) (represented by: H. Roerdink, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sören Pürschel (Frankfurt, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark BIENENBEISSER – European Union trade mark No 8 714 834
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 January 2024 in Case R 793/2023-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
partially annul the contested decision to the extent that the trade mark at issue was partially revoked for goods in Class 19; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 58(l)(a) read together with Article 33(7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2787/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)