Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024TN0104

Case T-104/24: Action brought on 22 February 2024 – Kokito I Punt v EUIPO – Fédération française de football (Representation of a rooster)

OJ C, C/2024/2636, 22.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2636/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2636/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/2636

22.4.2024

Action brought on 22 February 2024 – Kokito I Punt v EUIPO – Fédération française de football (Representation of a rooster)

(Case T-104/24)

(C/2024/2636)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Kokito I Punt, SL (Gandía, Spain) (represented by: J. Gallego Jiménez, E. Sanz Valls, P. Bauzá Martínez and Y. Hernández Viñes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fédération française de football (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for a European Union figurative mark (Representation of a rooster) – Application for registration No 18 469 266

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 December 2023 in Case R 901/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO and the intervener, if any, to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2636/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top