Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62024CN0008

Case C-8/24, D. d.o.o.: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki kazneni sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 9 January 2024 – Criminal proceedings involving D. d.o.o and Županijsko državno odvjetništvo u Zagrebu

OJ C, C/2024/2589, 22.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2589/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2589/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/2589

22.4.2024

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki kazneni sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 9 January 2024 – Criminal proceedings involving D. d.o.o and Županijsko državno odvjetništvo u Zagrebu

(Case C-8/24, D. d.o.o.)

(C/2024/2589)

Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Visoki kazneni sud Republike Hrvatske

Parties to the main proceedings

D. d.o.o.

Županijsko državno odvjetništvo u Zagrebu

Questions referred

1.

Does the term ‘proceedings in relation to a criminal offence that may result in confiscation of property, including confiscation without a conviction’ within the meaning of Article 2(3) of Regulation 2018/1805 (1)also include criminal proceedings concluded with an acquittal?

2.

Does the term ‘proceedings in relation to a criminal offence that may result in confiscation of property, including confiscation without a conviction’ within the meaning of Article 2(3) of Regulation 2018/1805 also include criminal proceedings concluded with a judgment of acquittal that includes an order to confiscate property as undue proceeds derived from another criminal offence, which is not the criminal offence of which the defendants were acquitted, and in whose commission the defendants were not involved, but rather persons against whom no indictment was brought?

3.

Is it contrary to Regulation 2018/1805, Article 1(2) thereof, and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to recognise a confiscation order issued in criminal proceedings in which an affected person, within the meaning of Article 2(10) of the regulation:

—

was not summoned to participate in all stages of the criminal proceedings;

—

was not advised of his or her right to a lawyer throughout the proceedings;

—

did not receive the full text of the judgment containing the confiscation order in a language he or she understood, but only excerpts from that judgment, and did not appeal against the judgment thus served.

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the mutual recognition of freezing orders and confiscation orders (OJ 2018 L 303, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2589/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top