This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TN0089
Case T-89/24: Action brought on 19 February 2024 — Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO — Homann Feinkost (Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’)
Case T-89/24: Action brought on 19 February 2024 — Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO — Homann Feinkost (Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’)
Case T-89/24: Action brought on 19 February 2024 — Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO — Homann Feinkost (Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’)
OJ C, C/2024/2331, 2.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2331/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2024/2331 |
2.4.2024 |
Action brought on 19 February 2024 — Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO — Homann Feinkost (Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’)
(Case T-89/24)
(C/2024/2331)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński sp.j. (Trzebiatów, Poland) (represented by: A. Brudnoch, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Homann Feinkost GmbH (Bad Essen, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’ — European Union trade mark No 17 305 947
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 December 2023 in Case R 287/2023-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
reject the request for a declaration of invalidity of the European Union trade mark Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’ No 17 305 947; |
|
— |
in the alternative, refer the case back to EUIPO for reconsideration; |
|
— |
order the EUIPO and the other party to bear the costs of the proceedings and reimburse the applicant’s costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2331/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)