Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN1135

Case T-1135/23: Action brought on 4 December 2023 — Funline International v EUIPO — MS Trade (JUNGLE PREMIUM)

OJ C, C/2024/1251, 12.2.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1251/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1251/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2024/1251

12.2.2024

Action brought on 4 December 2023 — Funline International v EUIPO — MS Trade (JUNGLE PREMIUM)

(Case T-1135/23)

(C/2024/1251)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Funline International (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: Z. Juppová, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: MS Trade s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark JUNGLE PREMIUM — European Union trade mark No 8 951 295

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 September 2023 in Case R 2263/2022-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision; or

—

annul the contested decision and reject the application for revocation; and

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the interpretation of the scope of protection conferred by the registration of a trade mark and as regards the interpretation of its genuine use;

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the nature of the goods in respect of which the trade mark is registered;

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the interpretation of the function of a trade mark;

—

Infringement of Article 19(1) of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1251/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top