Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023CN0716

Case C-716/23, Skycop.com: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 27 November 2023 — ‘Skycop.com’ UAB v Ryanair DAC

OJ C, C/2024/1087, 5.2.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1087/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1087/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2024/1087

5.2.2024

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 27 November 2023 — ‘Skycop.com’ UAB v Ryanair DAC

(Case C-716/23, Skycop.com)

(C/2024/1087)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Vilniaus apygardos teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: ‘Skycop.com’ UAB

Respondent: Ryanair DAC

Questions referred

1.

Is Article 6(1)(iii) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(a) thereof, to be interpreted as meaning that passengers who refused to take a flight that was delayed by at least five hours and for whom that flight was no longer serving any purpose are entitled to the compensation provided for in Article 7 of that regulation?

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, what conditions must be met for such a passenger to be entitled to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004, or is such a passenger entitled to compensation irrespective of the reason why the passenger refused to take a flight that was delayed by at least five hours?

(1)   OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1087/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top