This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024CN0791
Case C-791/24, TERVE Production: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 13 November 2024 – TERVE Production, spol. s r.o. v Intesa Sanpaolo Holding International S.A.
Case C-791/24, TERVE Production: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 13 November 2024 – TERVE Production, spol. s r.o. v Intesa Sanpaolo Holding International S.A.
Case C-791/24, TERVE Production: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 13 November 2024 – TERVE Production, spol. s r.o. v Intesa Sanpaolo Holding International S.A.
OJ C, C/2025/1077, 24.2.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1077/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2025/1077 |
24.2.2025 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 13 November 2024 – TERVE Production, spol. s r.o. v Intesa Sanpaolo Holding International S.A.
(Case C-791/24, TERVE Production)
(C/2025/1077)
Language of the case: Slovak
Referring court
Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky
Parties to the main proceedings
Party initiating the proceedings before the referring court: TERVE Production, spol. s r.o.
Other party to the proceedings: Intesa Sanpaolo Holding International S.A.
Questions referred
|
1. |
Must the provisions of Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast) (‘Regulation No 1215/2012’) be interpreted as meaning that an action to substitute the approval of the appellant’s draft agreement concerning the purchase of shares with a court ruling should be considered an action ‘in matters relating to a contract’? |
|
2. |
If the first question is answered in the negative, must the provisions of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 1215/2012 be interpreted as meaning that an action to substitute the approval of the appellant’s draft agreement concerning the purchase of shares with a court ruling should be considered an action ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict’? |
|
3. |
Must the provisions of Article 24(2) of Regulation No 1215/2012 be interpreted as also applying to the main proceedings in view of the fact that the appellant requests that the court in the main proceedings consider, as a preliminary issue, its plea that the resolution of the general meeting approving the transfer of the shares of the other shareholders (including the appellant’s shares) to the respondent is non-existent or invalid? |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1077/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)