This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TA0529
Case T-529/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2023 — QT v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Remuneration — Dependent child allowance — Education allowances — Recovery of sums paid but not due — Lack of competence of the author of the act — Infringement of the limitation period)
Case T-529/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2023 — QT v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Remuneration — Dependent child allowance — Education allowances — Recovery of sums paid but not due — Lack of competence of the author of the act — Infringement of the limitation period)
Case T-529/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2023 — QT v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Remuneration — Dependent child allowance — Education allowances — Recovery of sums paid but not due — Lack of competence of the author of the act — Infringement of the limitation period)
OJ C, C/2023/1158, 4.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1158/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Official Journal |
EN Series C |
C/2023/1158 |
4.12.2023 |
Judgment of the General Court of 11 October 2023 — QT v EIB
(Case T-529/22) (1)
(Civil service - EIB staff - Remuneration - Dependent child allowance - Education allowances - Recovery of sums paid but not due - Lack of competence of the author of the act - Infringement of the limitation period)
(C/2023/1158)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: QT (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and J. Pawlowicz, acting as Agents, and by A. Glavasevic and V. Wellens, lawyers)
Re:
By her action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 28 September 2021 to proceed with the recovery of an amount of EUR 61 186,61 wrongly paid towards education allowances, dependent child allowances and related benefits, for the period from July 2014 to June 2017, and of the EIB’s decision of 20 May 2022 rejecting her administrative appeal and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she allegedly suffered as a result of those decisions.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Annuls the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 28 September 2021 for the recovery of an amount of EUR 61 186,61 wrongly paid to QT towards education allowances, dependent child allowances and related benefits, for the period from July 2014 to June 2017, and the EIB’s decision of 20 May 2022 to reject her administrative appeal; |
2. |
Dismisses the claim for damages; |
3. |
Orders the EIB to pay the costs. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1158/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)