EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
You are here
C-801/21 P
Case C-801/21 P
C-801/21 P
Court of Justice
Status: In progress
Case on which the appeal is based: 62020TJ0342
C-801/21 P
Court of Justice
Status: In progress
Case on which the appeal is based: 62020TJ0342
/
DECISION
- Title
- Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2024. European Union Intellectual Property Office v Indo European Foods Ltd. Appeal – EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Abresham Super Basmati Selaa Grade One World’s Best Rice – Earlier non-registered United Kingdom word mark BASMATI – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(4) – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 72 – Relative ground for refusal – Opposition – Appeal before the Board of Appeal – Dismissal – Action before the General Court – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Articles 126 and 127 – Transition period – Effects of the end of the transition period on the protection of the earlier mark – Circumstances after the adoption of the decision at issue – Continuance of the purpose of the action and of the interest in bringing proceedings. Case C-801/21 P.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2024:528
- Complementary documents:
20/06/2024
PROCEEDINGS
- Title
- Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 23 November 2023.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2023:915
- Advocate General
- Szpunar
23/11/2023
- Title
- Order of the Court of 7 April 2022. European Union Intellectual Property Office v Indo European Foods Ltd. Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed. Case C-801/21 P.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2022:295
- Applicant
- European Union Intellectual Property Office, EU institutions and bodies
- Defendant
- Individual
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Gratsias
- Type of procedure
- Appeal,Action for annulment
07/04/2022