EUR-Lex Search results
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
You are here
Search Results
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 March 2024.
QN v European Commission.
Case T-531/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:166
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- General Court
- Date of document:
- 13/03/2024
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 February 2024.
Roberto Passalacqua v European Commission.
Case T-318/22.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:136
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- General Court
- Date of document:
- 28/02/2024
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 February 2024.
XH v European Commission.
Case T-353/22.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:63
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- General Court
- Date of document:
- 07/02/2024
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 June 2023.
YG v European Commission.
Appeal – Civil service – Official – Promotion – 2019 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the appellant to grade AST 9 – Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Comparison of merits – Distortion of the evidence – Disregard for and distortion of the pleas in the application at first instance – Infringement of the rights of the defence – Failure to fulfil the duty to state reasons.
Case C-818/21 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2023:511
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 22/06/2023
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 February 2023.
David Freixas Montplet and Others v Comittee of the Regions.
Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2021 promotion exercise – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the list of officials eligible for promotion – Date of assessment of seniority in grade – Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations – Equal treatment.
Case T-260/22.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:71
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- General Court
- Date of document:
- 15/02/2023
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 October 2021.
YG v European Commission.
Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2019 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 9 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Comparison of merits – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to state reasons.
Case T-599/20.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:709
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- General Court
- Date of document:
- 20/10/2021
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.
YP v European Commission.
Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2019 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Comparison of merits – Use of languages in the context of duties performed by officials assigned to linguistic duties and by officials assigned to duties other than linguistic – Seniority in grade – Presumption of innocence – Article 9 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Duty to state reasons – Compliance with a settlement agreement.
Case T-581/20.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:823
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- General Court
- Date of document:
- 24/11/2021
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 May 2022.
TK v European Commission.
Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2020 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 15 – Comparing merits – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.
Case T-435/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:303
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- General Court
- Date of document:
- 18/05/2022
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2022.
YG v European Commission.
Appeal – Civil service – Official – Promotion – 2017 promotion procedure – Decision not to promote the appellant – Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Comparison of the merits – Principle of equal treatment – Duty to state reasons.
Case C-361/20 P.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2022:17
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 13/01/2022
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2021.
RA v European Court of Auditors.
Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2016 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 11 – Absence of staff report – Comparison of merits – Compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Adoption of a new decision not to promote – Obligation to state reasons – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment.
Case T-867/19.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:361
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- General Court
- Date of document:
- 16/06/2021
New directory of case-law
Type of document: All, Case-Law directory code (new), 1st level: Staff cases, Case-Law directory code (new), 2nd level: Promotion