EUR-Lex Search results
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
You are here
Search Results
Case C-323/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales) (Chancery Division)) — Interflora Inc, Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc, Flowers Direct Online Ltd (Trade marks — Keyword advertising on the internet — Selection by the advertiser of a keyword corresponding to a competitor’s trade mark with a reputation — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 5(1)(a) and (2) — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 9(1)(a) and (c) — Condition that one of the trade mark’s functions be adversely affected — Detriment to the distinctive character of a trade mark with a reputation ( dilution ) — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of that trade mark ( free-riding ))
- CELEX number:
- 62009CA0323
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 22/09/2011
- Number of pages:
- 1
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 September 2011.
Interflora Inc. and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Ltd.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - United Kingdom.
Trade marks - Keyword advertising on the internet - Selection by the advertiser of a keyword corresponding to a competitor’s trade mark with a reputation - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 5(1)(a) and (2) - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 9(1)(a) and (c) - Condition that one of the trade mark’s functions be adversely affected - Detriment to the distinctive character of a trade mark with a reputation (‘dilution’) - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of that trade mark (‘free-riding’).
Case C-323/09.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2011:604
- CELEX number:
- 62009CJ0323
- Form:
- Judgment
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 22/09/2011
Opinion of Mr Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 24 March 2011.
Interflora Inc. and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Ltd.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - United Kingdom.
Trade marks - Keyword advertising on the internet - Selection by the advertiser of a keyword corresponding to a competitor’s trade mark with a reputation - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 5(1)(a) and (2) - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 9(1)(a) and (c) - Condition that one of the trade mark’s functions be adversely affected - Detriment to the distinctive character of a trade mark with a reputation (‘dilution’) - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or repute of that trade mark (‘free-riding’).
Case C-323/09.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2011:173
- CELEX number:
- 62009CC0323
- Form:
- Opinion of the Advocate General
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 24/03/2011
Case C-323/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Chancery Division, made on 12 August 2009 — Interflora Inc, Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc, Flowers Direct Online Limited
- CELEX number:
- 62009CN0323
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Date of document:
- 12/08/2009
- Number of pages:
- 1
Domain: All, CELEX number: 62009C?0323, Search language: Bulgarian