Briselē, 26.5.2004 KOM (2004) 366 galīgais KOMISIJAS PAZIŅOJUMS PADOMEI UN EIROPAS PARLAMENTAM Atjaunojamās enerģijas apmērs ES Komisijas ziņojums saskaņā ar Direktīvas 2001/77/EK 3. pantu, likumdošanas instrumentu un citu Kopienas politiku ietekmes izvērtēšana uz atjaunojamās enerģijas avotu devuma attīstību ES, kā arī priekšlikumi konkrētām darbībām (Dokuments attiecas uz EEZ) {SEC(2004) 547} TABLE OF CONTENTS Analītisks kopasvilkums 4 1. Ievads 7 1.1. The global challenges 7 1.2. Europe’s role 8 1.3. Scope of this Communication 10 1.4. New Member States 11 2. Commission report on national progress towards electricity produced from renewable energy sources (RES-E) targets 12 2.1. Information sources used 12 2.2. The overall picture 12 2.3. Assessment of progress at the national level 13 2.4. Practical requirements laid down in Directive 2001/77/EC 14 2.5. Guarantees of origin 16 2.6. Clarification of the role of the guarantee of origin in the calculation of progress towards national targets 17 2.7. Infringement procedures 18 2.8. Development of electricity from wind, biomass and solar 18 2.8.1. Wind energy 19 2.8.2. Electricity from biomass 20 2.8.3. Electricity from solar photovoltaics 21 2.9. Conclusions on the development of electricity from renewable energy sources 21 3. Efforts and results for 2010 22 3.1. The legislative framework developed since 2000 22 3.2. Member State Actions 24 3.3. Community support instruments 24 3.3.1. Community support programmes 24 3.3.2. Dissemination – Public Awareness Campaigns 26 3.4. Achieving the 12% target – the impact of Community legislation 26 3.4.1. Energy efficiency legislation 26 3.4.2. Legislation on electricity from renewable energy source 28 3.4.3. Biofuels 28 3.5. Renewable energy for heat production 30 3.5.1. The trend in geothermal 30 3.5.2. Solar thermal heat. 31 3.5.3. Biogas 31 3.5.4. Woody Biomass 32 3.5.5. Summary 33 3.6. Conclusion: Scenario for the renewable energy share in 2010 33 4. Concrete Actions 34 4.1. New initiatives to reinforce the financing of renewable energy – action by Member States 34 4.2. New initiatives to reinforce the renewable energy and energy efficiency – action at European level 35 4.3. Other measures 36 4.3.1. A Community plan for biomass 36 4.3.2. Developing renewable energy in heating 37 4.3.3. Offshore wind policy 37 4.3.4. Electricity from solar irradiation 38 4.3.5. Research and technological development 38 4.3.6. Using major Community financing instruments 39 4.3.7. Placing biofuels on the market 39 4.3.8. Timely data 39 5. International political context and EU perspectives beyond 2010 39 5.1. The Lisbon process and the environmental dimension 39 5.2. The Johannesburg conference and its follow-up 40 5.3. The role of targets at EU level 42 6. Secinājumi 43 Analītisks kopsavilkums 1. Kā noteikts Zaļajā grāmatā par energoapgādes drošību (2000.), Eiropas Savienības enerģētikas politikas galvenās prioritātes ir vērstas uz Savienības pieaugošo atkarību no enerģijas importa no nedaudziem pasaules reģioniem, kā arī klimata pārmaiņu risināšanu. Aplūkojot tuvākos divdesmit līdz trīsdesmit gadus, Zaļā grāmata vērsa uzmanību uz strukturālajām problēmām un ģeopolitiskajiem, sociālajiem un apkārtējās vides ES energoapgādes trūkumiem, īpaši attiecībā uz Eiropas saistībām, kuras tā uzņēmusies, ievērojot Kioto protokolu. Atjaunojamās enerģijas veicināšanai ir liela nozīme abos uzdevumos. No 1997. gada Savienība ir virzījusies uz ambiciozu mērķi – 12% atjaunojamās enerģijas apmēra no bruto iekšzemes enerģijas patēriņa līdz 2010. gadam. 1997. gadā atjaunojamās enerģijas apmērs bija 5,4%, līdz 2001. gadam tā bija sasniegusi 6%. 2. Paziņojums vērtē atjaunojamās enerģijas attīstības stāvokli Eiropas Savienībā. Tam ir trīs mērķi: - oficiālam ziņojumam, kuru Komisijai ir jāizveido saskaņā ar Direktīvas 2001/77/EK 3. pantu, kas izvērtē 15 dalībvalstu ES virzību uz 2010. gada nacionālo mērķu sasniegšanu attiecībā uz elektrības ieguvi no atjaunojamiem enerģijas avotiem ; - perspektīvu izvērtēšanai, lai varētu sasniegt 12% atjaunojamās enerģijas no vispārējā enerģijas patēriņa 15 dalībvalstu ES 2010. gadā (iekļaujot apkuri, elektrību un transportu), ņemot vērā ES likumdošanu kopš 2000. gada vai citus pasākumus atjaunojamās enerģijas un enerģijas efektivitātes jomā; - konkrētu darbību priekšlikumiem nacionālajā un Kopienas līmenī, lai nodrošinātu, ka tiek sasniegti mērķi attiecībā uz ES atjaunojamo enerģiju 2010. gadam Bonnas Pasaules atjaunojamās enerģijas konferences kontekstā (2004. gada jūnijs) un, pamatojoties uz to, ievirzes 2020. gadam. 3. Saskaņā ar Direktīvu 2001/77/EK visas dalībvalstis ir pieņēmušas nacionālos mērķus par elektroenerģijas ražošanas apmēru no atjaunojamajiem enerģijas avotiem . Pārsvarā tie ir saderīgi ar direktīvas I pielikumā norādītajām atsauces vērtībām. Ja dalībvalsts pieņem pasākumus, kas ir nepieciešami tās nacionālo mērķu sasniegšanai, elektroenerģijas apmēram, kuru iegūst no atjaunojamās enerģijas avotiem, 15 dalībvalstu ES elektroenerģijas ražošanā ir jāatbilst ar direktīvu noteiktajam 22 % apmēram. Tomēr attīstības ziņojumu analīzē, kurus dalībvalstis ir iesniegušas Komisijai, norādīts, ka pašlaik virzītā politika un īstenotie pasākumi, iespējams, sasniegs tikai no 18 līdz 19 % apmēru 2010. gadā, salīdzinot ar 14 % 2000. gadā. Viens no šādas neatbilstības iemesliem, iespējams, ir daudzu dalībvalstu vēl neīstenotā aktīvā politika saskaņā ar to pieņemtajiem mērķiem. Komisija novēros situāciju tajās dalībvalstīs, kā arī visu direktīvas prasību īstenošanu, lai vēlāk sagatavotu kontroles pasākumus. 4. No 2000. gada Komisija ir ierosinājusi ievērojamu jaunu juridisko instrumentu skaitu, lai sekmētu atjaunojamās enerģijas un enerģijas efektivitāti . Eiropas Parlaments un Padome ir pieņēmušas lielāko šo priekšlikumu daļu, un pārējie vēl atrodas starpinstitūciju procesa beigu posmā. Pieņemtie priekšlikumi ir: - Direktīva 2001/77/EK par tādas elektrības pielietojuma veicināšanu iekšējā elektrības tirgū, kas ražota, izmantojot atjaunojamos enerģijas avotus (OV L283/33, 27.10.2001.); - Direktīva 2003/30/EK par biodegvielas izmantošanas veicināšanu (OV L123/42, 17.05.2003.); - Direktīva 2002/91/EK par ēku energoaktivitāti (OV L1/65, 04.01.2003.); - Direktīva 2004/8/EK par koģenerācijas veicināšanu (OV L52/50, 21.02.2004.); - Direktīva 2003/96/EK par nodokļu uzlikšanu enerģijas resursiem un elektrībai (OV 283/51, 31.10.2003.); - Direktīva 2000/55/EK par luminiscentā apgaismojuma balastu energoefektivitātes prasībām (OV L279/33, 01.11.2000.); - Komisijas Direktīva 2002/40/EK par enerģijas etiķetēm mājsaimniecības elektriskajām cepeškrāsnīm (OV L128/45, 15.05.2002.); - Komisijas Direktīva 2002/31/EK par enerģijas etiķetēm mājsaimniecības gaisa kondicionieriem (OV L86/26, 03.04.2003); - Komisijas direktīva 2003/66/EK par enerģijas etiķetēm mājsaimniecības elektriskajiem ledusskapjiem (OV L170/10, 09.07.2003.); - Regula 2422/2001/EK par biroja iekārtu energoefektivitātes marķēšanas programmu (OV L332/1, 15.12.2001.). Šādus priekšlikumus izskata Eiropas Parlaments un Padome: - 01.08.2003. KOM (2003)453 ekodizaina prasībām enerģiju patērējošiem produktiem ; - 10.12.2003. KOM (2003)739 par enerģijas efektivitāti un enerģiētikas pakalpojumiem. 5. Komisija arī ir izvirzījusi priekšlikumu par daudzgadu programmu „Saprātīga enerģija Eiropai” (EIE), pamatojoties uz iepriekšējās Kopienas atbalsta programmas panākumiem (ALTENER, SAVE un RTD). 2003. gada jūnijā Eiropas Parlaments un Padome pieņēma priekšlikumu, kura budžets ir 250 miljoni eiru. 6. Ar jau īstenotajiem pasākumiem Komisija aprēķināja, ka atjaunojamās enerģijas avotu apmērs 15 dalībvalstu ES 2010. gadā varētu sasniegt 10%. Iztrūkumu salīdzinājumā ar izvirzītajiem 12% ir izraisījusi atjaunojamās enerģijas tirgus lēnā izaugsme apkures un dzesēšanas nozarē; tādēļ jāsecina, ka šajā nozarē ir nepieciešami ievērojami ārkārtas pasākumi, lai pilnībā sasniegtu izvirzīto mērķi - 12%. Tomēr šis novērtējums ir pamatots uz tā, ka nacionālās un vietējās varas iestādes pilnībā ievēro ES tiesību aktu prasības. Direktīvas 2001/77/EK piemērs liecina, ka to nevar uzskatīt kā pašu par sevi saprotamu. Ja atjaunojamās enerģijas apmērs saskaņā ar šo direktīvu 2010. gadā būs tikai no 18 līdz 19 % elektrības tirgū, tad atjaunojamās enerģijas apmērs no kopējā enerģijas patēriņā nebūs lielāks par 9%. Uz Kopienas ieviesto tiesību aktu pamata tieši dalībvalstīm jāuzņemas atbildība, lai nodrošinātu izvirzīto mērķu un pasākumu īstenošanu. Tam vajadzīgas daudzas nacionālās darbības, tostarp centieni nodrošināt, lai nodibinātie uzņēmumi energoapgādes nozarēs segtu daļu no izmaksām par atjaunojamās enerģijas veicināšanu. Paziņojums arī iepazīstina ar daudzām papildu konkrētām darbībām Kopienas līmenī, lai atbalstītu dalībvalstu centienus sasniegt 15 dalībvalstu ES 12 % apmēru. 7. Pasaules Atjaunojamās enerģijas konference, kas notiks 2004. gada jūnijā Bonnā, risinās jautājumus par atjaunojamās enerģijas veicināšanu pasaulē kā veidu, kādā cīnīties ar klimata pārmaiņām, sekmēt energoapgādes drošību un (īpaši jaunattīstības valstīm) samazināt nabadzību. Berlīnē 2004. gada janvārī notikusī Eiropas sagatavošanas konferencē tika , uzsvērts, ka vispārīgie vispārējie atjaunojamās enerģijas mērķi jāpagarina arī pēc 2010. gada. Vērā ņēma arī virkni tehnisko pētījumu, saskaņā ar kuru līdz 2020. gadam varētu sasniegt vismaz 20 % atjaunojamās enerģijas no vispārējā enerģijas patēriņā 25 valstu ES 2020. gadā, izmantot instrumentus, kas ir izveidoti ar pašreizējiem Kopienas tiesību aktiem, un papildu darbības. Komisijai ir apņēmusies sekmēt, lai šī konference būtu sekmīga, kā arī ir uzsvērusi daudzas darbības, ko tā piedāvās kā ieguldījumu starptautiskajā rīcības programmā. 1. Ievads 1.1. Globālie izaicinājumi Kā noteikts Zaļajā grāmatā par energoapgādes drošību (2000.), Eiropas Savienības enerģētikas politikas galvenās prioritātes ir vērstas uz Savienības pieaugošo atkarību no enerģijas importa no nedaudziem pasaules reģioniem, kā arī klimata pārmaiņu risināšanu. Aplūkojot tuvākos divdesmit līdz trīsdesmit gadus, Zaļā grāmata vērsa uzmanību uz strukturālajām problēmām un ģeopolitiskajiem, sociālajiem un apkārtējās vides ES energoapgādes trūkumiem, īpaši attiecībā uz Eiropas saistībām, kuras tā uzņēmusies, ievērojot Kioto protokolu Atjaunojamās enerģijas veicināšanai ir liela nozīme abos uzdevumos. No 1997. gada Savienība ir virzījusies uz ambiciozu mērķi – 12% atjaunojamās enerģijas apmēra no bruto iekšzemes enerģijas patēriņa līdz 2010. gadam. 1997. gadā 15 dalībvalstu ES atjaunojamās enerģijas daļa bija 5,4 %; līdz 2001. gadam tā bija sasniegusi 6% (salīdzinājumam nafta veidoja 40 %, dabasgāze – 23 %, atomenerģija – 16 % un cietais kurināmais – 15 %). Papildus, atjaunojamā enerģija sekmē gaisa kvalitātes uzlabošanu, novatoriskās iespējas, jaunu uzņēmumu izveidi, nodarbinātības pieaugumu un lauku attīstību triju ilgtspējīgas attīstības pīlāru stiprināšanas sakarā. Globālajā līmenī enerģijas patēriņš pieaug strauji – par 15 % desmitgadē no 1990. līdz 2000. gadam. Ir paredzams, ka tas pieaugs vēl ātrāk no 2000. līdz 2020. gadam. Degizrakteņi (ogles, gāze un nafta) veido 80 % no pasaules enerģijas patēriņa. Globālais degizrakteņu patēriņš 90. gados pieauga atbilstoši vispārējam enerģijas patēriņam. Ir paredzams, ka degizrakteņu izmantošana pieaugs pat ātrāk nekā vispārējais patēriņš līdz 2020. gadam. Degizrakteņiem ir daudzas priekšrocības. Tos ir samērā lēti iegūt, ērti izmantot, kā arī tie ir plaši pieejami. To piegādes infrastruktūra ir izstrādāta. Nozares, kas tos piegādā, ir labi organizētas un nodrošina piegādi teju visā pasaulē. Tiem ir divi galvenie trūkumi. Pirmkārt, tiem sadegot, gaisā tiek izlaisti piesārņotāji un gāzes, kas rada siltumnīcas efektu, tādējādi izraisot klimata pārmaiņas. Otrkārt, valstis, kurām nav piemērotu degizrakteņu rezervju, - īpaši naftas, - saskaras ar pieaugošu risku attiecībā uz savas energoapgādes drošību. Atkarība no importa un pieaugošā importa attiecība var radīt bažas par piegāžu pārtraukšanu vai sarežģīt piegādi. Tomēr piegādes drošību nav atkarīga tikai no tā, vai samazinās atkarība no importa un pieaug atbalsts vietējai ražošanai. Piegādes drošībai vajadzīga virkne politisko iniciatīvu, kas, cita starpā, ir vērstas uz avotu un tehnoloģiju dažādošanu, nenovērtējot par zemu ģeopolitisko kontekstu un tā ietekmi. Eiropas Komisija ir izteikusi arī citviet savus domas par to, kā risināt šīs problēmas, jo īpaši Zaļajā grāmatā par energoapgādes drošību (2000.)[1] un savā paziņojumā par „Sadarbību ar jaunattīstības valstīm enerģētikas nozarē” (2002.).[2] Atjaunojamā enerģija kā degizrakteņu aizvietotājs var palīdzēt risināt klimata pārmaiņas. Atbalstot enerģijas ražošanas dažādošanu, tā var uzlabot piegādes drošību. Atjaunojamai enerģijai par labu liecina, tās spēja aizsargāt gaisa kvalitāti un radīt jaunas darbavietas un uzņēmumus – daudzas no tiem lauku rajonos. Šobrīd ieguldījumi atjaunojamajā enerģijā būtībā nav lētākais veids, kā samazināt siltumnīcas efektu izraisošo gāzu izplūdi. Ir lētāk enerģiju izmantot efektīvāk. Tomēr ilgtermiņā ieguldījumi atjaunojamajā enerģijā ir ļoti svarīgi. Pieredze tādās nozarēs, kā piemēram, vēja enerģija, ir pierādījums tam, ka ilgtspējīgi ieguldījumi sekmē jaunievedumus, kas padara atjaunojamās enerģijas izmantošanu lētāku. Salīdzinājumam – papildu enerģijas efektivitātes pasākumu izmaksas pieaug pēc tam, kad ir izsmeltas īstermiņa iespējas. Abos gadījumos ir vajadzīgi ieguldījumi. 1.2. Eiropas loma Eiropas Savienībai, pat paplašinātai 25 dalībvalstu Eiropas Savienībai, būs jāatskaitās tikai par 7 % globālās enerģijas patēriņa pieauguma no 2000. līdz 2020. gadam. Ir sagaidāms, ka vairāk nekā trešdaļu patērēs Ķīna un Indija. Lēmumiem šeit un citās jaunajās industrializētajās valstīs būs pieaugoša ietekme uz pasaules enerģijas patēriņa līmeni un veidu. Eiropas Savienībai un citām ESAO valstīm ir morāla un praktiskā loma, lai jaunajās industrializētajās valstīs varētu izstrādāt politiku, kas palīdz nodrošināt to energoapgādi un kontrolē klimata pārmaiņas, neapdraudot savu ekonomisko izaugsmi. 25 valstu ES vidusmēra pilsonis patērē apmēram piecas reizes vairāk degizrakteņu enerģijas nekā vidusmēra Āzijas, Āfrikas un Tuvo Austrumu pilsonis (tas pats attiecas arī uz Japānas un Klusā okeāna reģiona pilsoņiem. Amerikas Savienoto Valstu pilsoņi patērē apmēram 12 reizes vairāk.) Ja bagātākās valstis neierobežos savu degizrakteņu patēriņu, tām nav lielu izredžu pierunāt mazāk pārtikušās valstis rīkoties līdzīgi – īpaši, ja tik daudz cilvēkiem jaunattīstības valstīs trūkst atbilstošu enerģētikas pakalpojumu. Eiropas Savienība ir izveidojusi īpašu praktisko ieguldījumu atjaunojamās enerģijas jomā, proti, izstrādājusi labākos un lētākos tehniskos un institucionālos risinājumus. Eiropa ir uzņēmusies vadību, attīstot un īstenojot modernas atjaunojamās enerģijas tehnoloģijas. Rietumeiropa, kuru patērē 16 % pasaules enerģijas, atbild par 31 % elektrības ražošanas pieaugumu pasaulē no biomasas laikposmā no 1990. līdz 2000. gadam, par 48 % pieaugumu no mazajām hidroelektrostacijām un par 79 % pieaugumu saistībā ar vēja ģeneratoriem. Eiropas Savienība un tās dalībvalstis pirmās ir izstrādājušas politiku un reglamentējošos dokumentus, piemēram, mērķus un finanšu shēmas, ar kurām jāattīsta atjaunojamās enerģijas nozare. Eiropas uzņēmumi ir vadošie pasaulē atjaunojamās enerģijas tehnoloģijas jomā. Ja Eiropa vēlas saglabāt savu nozīmi, tā nedrīkst ieslīgt pašapmierinātībā. Kā ir redzams grafikā, atjaunojamās enerģijas ieguldījums Eiropā joprojām atpaliek no cietā kurināmā, naftas, gāzes un atomenerģijas. [pic] +++++ TABLE +++++ Bet, tā kā atjaunojamajai enerģijai ir nozīmīga loma, būtu svarīgi ņemt vērā dažas problēmas. Pirmkārt, ir tehniski un praktiski ierobežojumi saistībā ar atjaunojamās enerģijas rentablu pieejamību. Saules un vēja enerģijas gadījumā ir ievērojamas ģeogrāfiskās atšķirības. Biomasas ražošanai ir jākonkurē ar citu veidu zemes izmantošanu, jo īpaši ar lauksaimniecību. Pastāv ierobežojums attiecībā uz daudzām ielejām, kuras var izmantot hidroelektrostaciju elektroenerģijai. Komisijas dienestu darba dokumentā, kas ir publicēts papildus šim paziņojumam, ir rūpīgi analizēts atjaunojamās enerģijas potenciāls katrā dalībvalstī. Kā ir norādīts šai paziņojumā, ir gaidāma dziļāka analīze. Otrkārt, atjaunojamās enerģijas avotiem ir nepieciešami tradicionāli enerģijas avoti kā rezerve. Vēja un saules enerģija nav pastāvīga un tās pieejamība nav iepriekš paredzama. Klimatiskie faktori katru gadu var radīt lielas pārmaiņas biomasas un hidrojaudas pieejamības ziņā. Šo iemeslu dēļ pastāv ierobežojumi atjaunojamās enerģijas īpatsvarā, kuru var adsorbēt mūsdienu energoapgādes sistēmas. Tas var izraisīt tradicionālo avotu lieku ražošanas jaudu, radot papildu izmaksas. Atjaunojamās enerģijas attīstība var arī prasīt jaunus ieguldījumus pašreizējās enerģijas sistēmās, piemēram, elektroenerģijas tīklos. Enerģētikas politikā ir jāattīsta vairāki enerģijas avoti – to nedrīkst aizmirst, ņemot vērā pieredzi par to, ka dažādība ir vajadzīga. Turklāt šodien dažādākas un drošākas enerģijas sistēmas, iekļaujot lielāku atjaunojamās daļu, izveide būtībā nozīmē politiku ar lielākām izmaksām. Tas ir fakts, ka hidroenerģija un tradicionāla kokmateriāla izmantošana ir konkurētspējīga ar parastajiem enerģijas veidiem un ka vēja enerģija dažos piekrastes reģionos ar augsta vēja ātrumu vidējo rādītāju kļūst konkurētspējīgāka. Tomēr daudzi atjaunojamās enerģijas veidu, piemēram, biomasas elektrības un biodegvielas, izmaksas ir divas vai vairākas reizes augstākas, nekā to parastās alternatīvas, ja salīdzina atsevišķi, neņemot vērā kopējās enerģijas sistēmas ietekmi uz izmaksām. Citas, piemēram, fotogalvaniskā enerģija joprojām ir dārgākas.[3] Tāpēc ir daži šķēršļi atjaunojamās enerģijas attīstībā. Lai gan pašreizējais tehnoloģiskās attīstības stāvoklis neļauj redzēt pasauli, kurā parastos enerģijas avotus pilnībā aizvieto ar atjaunojamo enerģiju, noteikti ir iespējama pakāpeniska pieeja. Jau ir uzlabotie analītiskie un vadības instrumenti, kas ļauj attīstīt atbilstošu reakciju uz šiem izaicinājumiem un galvenajiem šķēršļiem. Tas iekļauj sarežģītākus izmaksu aprēķināšanas modeļus, kuros ņem vērā palielināto atjaunojamās enerģijas apmēru ieguldījumu kopējās enerģijas sistēmas izmaksās, sarežģītāki laika prognozes instrumenti var tikt iekļauti modernās enerģijas vadības sistēmās, lai labāk saskaņotu piegādi ar pieprasījumu. Tāpēc savlaicīgi tiks veikta papildu analīze, kā minēts šajā dokumentā. 1.3. Šī paziņojuma darbības joma No 1997. gada Eiropas Savienība ir darbojusies, lai sasniegtu vispārējos mērķus – 12 % atjaunojamās enerģijas apmēra no bruto iekšzemes enerģijas patēriņa 15 dalībvalstu ES 2010. gadā, salīdzinājumā ar 5,2 % 1995. gadā. Lielākais šīs mērķa sasniegšanas risks ir neesošais līdzsvars starp dažādiem valstu saistību līmeņiem atjaunojamās enerģijas attīstībā. Lai nodrošinātu mērķi ātrākai attīstībai, Eiropas Savienība no 2000. gada ir noteikusi ar tiesību aktu palīdzību divus atjaunojamās enerģijas orientējošos mērķus : - pieaugums līdz 22 % elektroenerģijas apmēra, kuru ražo ar atjaunojamās enerģijas palīdzību 2010. gadā 15 dalībvalstu ES (tas ir pielīdzināms 14 % 2000. gadā);[4] - pieaugums līdz 5,75 % biodegvielas (dīzeļdegvielas un benzīna) apmēra, ko izmanto transportam 2010. gadā (tas ir pielīdzināms 0,6 % 2002. gadā).[5] Komisija arī ir ierosinājusi vērā ņemamu jaunu juridisko instrumentu skaitu enerģijas efektivitātes sekmēšanai. Eiropas Parlaments un Padome ir pieņēmušas lielāko šo priekšlikumu daļu, un pārējie vēl atrodas starpinstitūciju procesa beigu posmā. Šim paziņojumam ir trīs mērķi: - oficiālam ziņojumam, kuru Komisijai ir jāizveido saskaņā ar Direktīvas 2001/77/EK 3. pantu, kas izvērtē 15 dalībvalstu ES virzību uz 2010. gada nacionālo mērķu sasniegšanu attiecībā uz elektrības patēriņu no atjaunojamiem enerģijas avotiem ; - perspektīvu izvērtēšanai, lai varētu sasniegt 12% atjaunojamās enerģijas no vispārējā enerģijas patēriņā 15 dalībvalstu ES 2010. gadā (iekļaujot apkuri, elektrību un transportu), ņemot vērā ES likumdošanu kopš 2000. gada vai citus pasākumus atjaunojamās enerģijas un enerģijas efektivitātes jomā; - konkrētu darbību priekšlikumiem nacionālajā un Kopienas līmenī, lai nodrošinātu, ka tiek sasniegti mērķi attiecībā uz ES atjaunojamo enerģiju 2010. gadam Bonnas Pasaules atjaunojamās enerģijas konferences kontekstā (2004. gada jūnijs) un, pamatojoties uz to, ievirzes 2020. gadam. 1.4. Jaunās dalībvalstis ES desmit jaunajām dalībvalstīm piemēro Direktīvas 2001/77/EK prasības par elektroenerģiju, kas ražota no atjaunojamajiem enerģijas avotiem. Valsts orientējošie mērķi attiecībā uz elektrības patēriņa apmēru no atjaunojamās enerģijas katrā jaunajā dalībvalstī ir noteikti Pievienošanās līgumā. Būtībā tas nozīmē, ka 2010. gadā kopējais 25 valstu ES mērķis attiecībā uz atjaunojamās enerģijas apmēru ir 21 %. Direktīva 15 dalībvalstu ES gadījumā paredz, ka Komisijai jāpieņem pirmais progresa ziņojums 2004. gadā. Tam veltīta šā paziņojuma 2. nodaļa. Šai nolūkā tajā ir aplūkota 15 dalībvalstu ES. Desmit jauno dalībvalstu gadījumā pirmais progresa ziņojums uz nacionālo ziņojumu pamata, kas jāsastāda attiecīgajām dalībvalstīm, jāiesniedz tikai 2006. gadā. Tāpēc 2. nodaļā nav novērtēts šo dalībvalstu stāvoklis. Tomēr informācijai nodaļā ir minēti daži labas attīstības paraugi attiecībā uz elektroenerģijas ražošanu no atjaunojamās enerģijas avotiem jaunajās dalībvalstīs. Uz jaunajām dalībvalstīm attiecas prasības Direktīvā (2003/30/EK) attiecībā uz biodegvielu. 2006. gadā Komisija sastādīs pirmo progresa ziņojumu par šo direktīvu. Tas aptvers visas 25 dalībvalstis. 12 % no atjaunojamās enerģijas apmēra no vispārējā enerģijas patēriņa ir 15 valstu ES mērķis. Virzība uz šo mērķi ir izvērtēta šā paziņojuma 3. nodaļā. Tāpat kā 2. nodaļa arī šī nodaļa tāpēc akcentē dalībvalstis, kurās šis mērķis tiek piemērots. Arī šeit uzskatāmībai ir minēti atsevišķi piemēri no dalībvalstīm. Paziņojuma 4. un 5. nodaļā tiek analizēta nākotnes politika un darbības. Tās attiecas uz visu ES. Komisijas dienestu darba dokuments, kas ir publicēts ar šo paziņojumu, attiecas uz visām dalībvalstīm. 2. COMMISSION REPORT ON NATIONAL PROGRESS TOWARDS ELECTRICITY PRODUCED FROM RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES (RES-E) TARGETS 2.1. Information sources used Under article 3.4 of Directive 2001/77/EC, the Commission is required to assess to what extent: “- Member States have made progress towards achieving their national indicative targets, - the national indicative targets are consistent with the global indicative target of 12% of gross national energy consumption by 2010 and in particular with the 22.1% indicative share of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in total Community electricity consumption by 2010.” According to Articles 3.2 and 3.3 of the Directive, Member States must adopt national reports setting their national targets and analysing their success in meeting them. Reports on national targets were due in 2002. All EU15 Member States have adopted them. Reports on progress towards national targets were due by October 2003. All Member States except Finland, Luxembourg and Italy have sent them to the Commission (see Commission Staff Working Document). The Commission has analysed these reports and commissioned several consultancies to make assessments of the impact of the measures they describe (see Commission Staff Working Document). 2.2. The overall picture A first conclusion is that the target adopted by each Member State is consistent with the national reference value listed in Annex I of Directive 2001/77/EC, although Sweden has used a different method to fix a different value[6]. If Member States meet these national targets, the overall share of renewable electricity in the EU15 will achieve the target of about 22% in 2010, as required by the Directive. Unfortunately, the national policies, measures and achievements reported by Member States paint a less rosy picture. It should be underlined that it is difficult to predict exactly how measures now adopted will affect the share of electricity from renewable sources in 2010. However, the extrapolation scenarios set out in the Commission Staff Working Document lead to the second conclusion that, although progress towards meeting the targets has begun, the 2010 target will not be achieved under current policies and measures, even under a scenario that builds in reductions in total electricity demand as a result of new energy efficiency measures. Instead, currently implemented policies will probably result in a share of between 18% and 19% in 2010 (see charts). [pic][pic] [pic] A third conclusion is that the main reason why the target is not being achieved is because the production of electricity from biomass has not been as high as initially previewed. The main difference between 2nd chart (showing the effect of national policies and measures now in place or recently planned) and 3rd chart (showing a practicable scenario for achieving the 22.1% target set in the Directive) is the size of the biomass (green area) contribution. 2.3. Assessment of progress at the national level Country reports indicate considerable differences between Member States. Figure 1, based on the detailed information in Commission Staff Working Document, arranges Member States in three groups according to the probability that, with the energy policies currently adopted, they will achieve their national targets. The first group (Germany, Denmark, Spain, Finland) is on track. The countries in the second group (Austria, Belgium, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom, France) have started to implement appropriate policies. For this group there is a mixture of positive and negative indications regarding the achievement of the 2010 targets. The countries in the third group (Greece, Portugal) are not on track to achieve their national targets. Italy and Luxembourg adopted new laws in March 2004. It has not yet been possible to assess their likely effects. However, only limited progress can be recorded for these two Member States during last 3 years. See Commission Staff Working Document for more details. +++++ TABLE +++++ Figure 1: Member States’ progress towards achieving their national indicative target by 2010 On track. Denmark, if it maintains its active approach, is likely to achieve the 2010 target (29%) as early as 2005. Denmark has increased the share of electricity from renewable sources from 8.9% in 1997 to 20% in 2002. Germany has increased the share from 4.5% in 1997 to 8% in 2002 (national target of 12.5%) with wind generation growing from 3 TWh in 1997 to 17 TWh in 2002 (equal to 3% of the total electricity consumption in 2002). Spain is the second European country for wind power although its biomass policy needs to be given higher priority. According to Finland’s national report, the contribution of electricity from renewable energy, passed from 7 TWh in 1997 to 10 TWh in 2002 excluding hydro. Although 2002 was a bad year for hydropower in Finland, the evolution of biomass has been impressive in the recent years. One of the drivers of success in all four countries was an attractive support system in a stable and long-term framework. About to be on track. For electricity from renewable energy, United Kingdom and Netherlands have actively invested in a new policy although the full results still have to materialise. Ireland has set up a support system through tendering but there are big difficulties in connecting wind electricity to the grid. Since 2002, Belgium has a new green certificate system. For the moment this does not show visible results. France recently put in place a new tariff system. The attractiveness of the tariffs is, however, reduced by the upper limit of 12 MW for each project. This particularly affects wind energy. In addition, long approval procedures and grid connection problems remain major obstacles. Sweden implemented a green certificate system in May 2003. Electricity generation from renewable energy rose hardly at all in Sweden between 1997 and 2002. But signals from 2003 are much better. Austria has a good perspective for growth. Such a development is facilitated by the feed-in tariffs introduced in January 2003, however not excluding a streamlining of the support scheme with additional efficiency requirements. Not on track. So far, the development of electricity from renewable energy has been held back in Greece. Administrative barriers prevent exploitation of the high potential that exists both in wind, biomass and solar. Portugal has increased its non-hydro production of electricity from renewable energy by only 1 TWh since 1997. A further 14 TWh are still needed to achieve its national target. 2.4. Practical requirements laid down in Directive 2001/77/EC In addition to the requirement for national indicative targets, the Directive lays down practical requirements for Member States in four areas. These are designed to ensure stable investment conditions for electricity from renewable energy: 1) the implementation of attractive support schemes, which should be as efficient as possible, 2) the removal of administrative barriers, 3) the guarantee of fair grid access, 4) the issuing of a guarantee of origin. Most Member States have implemented a support system for renewable energy. These take the form of feed-in tariffs, quota obligations and/or green certificates. National reports show that appropriate financial mechanisms are not enough. In several cases, take-off is blocked by complex licensing procedures, poor integration of electricity from renewable energy in regional and local planning and opaque grid-connection procedures. The table gives an overview of the situation in the Member States. +++++ TABLE +++++ Table 1: Overview of Member States’s administrative and grid barriers In accordance with the Directive, the Commission will report in 2005 on support systems (Article 4.2) and best practices in administrative procedures (Article 6.3). 2.5. Guarantees of origin Article 5 of the Directive requires Member States to implement a system for a guarantee of origin by 27 October 2003. Implementation is in several stages. The most important of these are: implementing legislation, appointing the body for issuing the guarantees of origin and establishing an accurate and reliable system including the preparation of documents and registries. Based on national reports and supplementary information, the situation in March 2004 is the following: +++++ TABLE +++++ Full implementation – 3 “completed” boxes – means that a guarantee of origin can actually be issued. Although the table shows more green than red, implementation is not yet complete. The Commission will consider the practical implementation of guarantees of origin in its report on support systems in 2005. It will look at the validity of guarantees and the need for redemption, the reliability of the system, and the inclusion of guarantees of origin into the different support schemes, as appropriate. In accordance with Article 5 of the Directive, the Commission will consider the desirability of proposing common rules for guarantees of origin. 2.6. Clarification of the role of the guarantee of origin in the calculation of progress towards national targets In the Directive (Article 3), national targets are defined in terms of the consumption of renewable electricity from renewable energy sources as a percentage of total national electricity consumption. The consumption of electricity is defined as national production plus imports minus exports. In the Directive’s Annex I, reference values for national targets are determined solely as percentages of national production. The question that arises is under what conditions can a Member State consider that imported renewable electricity is contributing to the achievement of its target under the Directive. A Member State cannot meet its targets with imports from outside the EU. This is made clear in a footnote to the table in the Annex I, which states that in “…. the case of internal trade of RES-E (with recognised certification of origin registered) the calculation of these percentages will influence 2010 figures by Member States but not the Community total.” However, the situation is not so clear regarding imports from within the EU. The Commission acknowledges the need to clarify how progress towards national targets is to be calculated. In particular, it is important to define the role of guarantees of origin. The Commission has decided to apply the following principle in assessing the extent to which national targets are met: A Member State can only include a contribution from import from another Member State if the exporting state has accepted explicitly, and stated on a guarantee of origin, that it will not use the specified amount of renewable electricity to meet its own target and thereby also accepted that this electricity can be counted towards the importing Member State’s target. It should be emphasised that trade in renewable electricity should occur. Consumer preferences may in any case generate trade. However, in the absence of the agreement of the exporting country, the production will be counted towards the target of this exporting country. Exporting Member States could include this agreement directly in guarantees of origin for renewable electricity produced on their territory. If they do not do so, importing Member States could ask for a supplementary approval with reference to the guarantee of origin in question. 2.7. Infringement procedures The Commission will examine the transposition of the binding text of Directive 2001/77/EC, in particular regarding the practical requirements described above. It will take into account the national report and will take infringement action where appropriate. 2.8. Development of electricity from wind, biomass and solar In total, renewable energy accounts in 2002 for about 15.2% of total electricity generation. Nuclear energy accounts for 33%. Fossil fuel thermal processes account for the remainder. The EU15 is using nearly all its large hydro potential. The contribution of this renewable energy source is high but the total capacity will remain stable. The two technologies that can be expected to deliver most of the increase in electricity from renewable sources in EU15 for 2010 are wind and biomass. However, in the new Member States – particularly in Slovenia, Hungary and Lithuania – there is still an important potential to increase hydro energy generation. Output expectations from the different biomass uses need to be reassessed taking into account its efficiency and availability. Section 2.2 showed clear differences in their growth rates of both energy sources. In addition, for strategic reasons on a medium time horizon (towards 2020 and beyond), solar energy is also observed. 2.8.1. Wind energy The European wind industry has 90% of the world equipment market. Nine of the world’s ten largest wind turbine manufacturers are based in Europe. The industry employs 72,000 people, up from 25,000 in 1998. Costs per kWh have fallen by 50% over the last 15 years. Installed capacity in the EU15 grew by 23% in 2003, to a total of more than 28 GW (Figure 2). In an average wind year this capacity can produce 60 TWh of electricity, approximately 2.4% of EU electricity consumption. This success story is not the result of a common European effort. As the chart shows, Germany, Spain and Denmark contribute 84% of total EU15 wind power capacity. [pic] Figure 2: Wind energy capacity growth in EU15 1997-2003 – three leading markets In 1997 and as part of the 12% target, the Commission hoped to see 40 GW of wind power capacity installed by 2010. This will clearly be exceeded. Industry estimates now suggest that 75 GW could be installed by 2010[7] (generating approximately 167 TWh per year). However, the final result for 2010 will depend on the efforts of those Member States where wind energy has not yet taken off. There are positive signals from UK, Austria, the Netherlands and Italy due to an improved policy framework. In other countries wind power is growing only slowly. In France, 91 MW was added in 2003 (as against 2.645 MW in Germany in the same year), with total capacity reaching 239 MW. In Greece 3.715 MW had been given first-step approval under national administrative procedures by September 2003 – but installed capacity was only 375 MW. The experience of the three leading countries suggests that successful expansion of wind power benefits from: - an attractive long-term financial framework, - removal of administrative barriers through the implementation of uniform planning procedures and licensing systems, - guarantee of a fair grid access and non-discriminatory tariffs, - least-cost network planning. The estimate of 75 GW of installed wind power capacity in 2010 includes 10 GW offshore. Offshore wind power will become more and more important as good wind sites on land are used up. Offshore wind power has several advantages. The wind is stronger and more reliable at sea (most marine sites in northern European waters are expected to deliver between 20% and 40% more wind energy than good shoreline sites). Neighbours fearing disturbance are fewer. However, the cost of generating electricity from offshore power plants is currently higher than from onshore plants. Denmark, with the highest wind power share of any Member State, is pioneering offshore wind power. The UK announced in July 2003 that it would sponsor offshore projects. These are positive developments which other Member States could follow. 2.8.2. Electricity from biomass Unfortunately, the success of the wind sector is not outweighing the slow growth of biomass electricity. Between 1997 and 2001, Finland, Denmark and the UK (mainly using biogas) were the only countries in which biomass electricity grew steadily. In some countries the biomass contribution grew comparably but intermittently, and in others it stayed small. In general, coordinated policies are lacking and financial support is little. In 1997, the Commission expected that 68% of the growth in electricity from renewable energy sources would come from biomass. 24% could come from wind power and 8% from a mixture of hydro, geothermal and photovoltaic power. Now, the strong growth of wind power means that it can be expected to contribute 50% of the increase needed to achieve the target set in the Directive. Hydro, geothermal and photovoltaic power can be expected to contribute 10%. Consequently, the target will only be achieved if biomass contributes the remaining 40%. It will need to grow from 43 TWh in 2002[8] to 162 TWh. This will require biomass electricity to grow by 18% a year – compared with a rate of only 7% a year over the past 7 years (see chart).[9] In most of the new Member States there is an important potential for the use of biomass for both electricity and heat generation. This is particular true for the widely unexploited potential for electricity generation in Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia. [pic] This requirement should be seen in the context of the need for increased quantities of biomass not only for electricity generation, but also for heating and transport (see Chapter 3), and the biomass potential for cogeneration applications. 2.8.3. Electricity from solar photovoltaics In 2003, the photovoltaic industry produced some 740 MWp of photovoltaic modules world-wide, and it has become a 4 bill. € business. In the past 5 years, the yearly growth rate was more than 30% on average. Besides the exponential increase of the world market, the faster increase of the Japanese production capacities is of particular European concern. Since the introduction of the German Feed-in Law in 1999 the European PV production grew in average by 50% /year and has reached 190 MW in 2003. Europe’s world market share rose in the same time from 20% to 26%, whereas the US share decreased due to a weak home market and the Japanese share increased to 49%. European PV industry has to continue this growth over the next years in order to maintain its share. This however will only be possible, if reliable political framework conditions are created, in order to enable a return on investment for the PV industry. Besides this political issue targeted improvements of the solar cell and system technology are still required. Although PV output is still small, its EU growth rate curve quite exactly mirrors that of wind power, with a delay of approximately 12 years. European installed PV capacity doubled between 2001 and 2003, Germany accounting for more than 70% of the total. However, PV also doubled in Spain and Austria, whereas Luxembourg achieved the highest PV power per inhabitant : 8W per capita. If the whole EU did likewise, it would produce around 3.6 TWh/annum on 3.6 GWp installed PV capacity. 2.9. Conclusions on the development of electricity from renewable energy sources Directive 2001/77/EC was the first legislative text to be adopted by the Council and the European Parliament explicitly aimed at the development of renewable energy. In October 2002 Member States confirmed their national targets. Collectively, Europe confirmed its intent to achieve a 22% share of electricity from renewable energy sources by 2010. October 2003 was the deadline for Member States to put in place the laws and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive. All Member States have reported on their measures. During 2002 and 2003 nine Member States implemented a new policy for the promotion of electricity from renewable energy (see Commission Staff Working Document). Two countries already had active measures in place. Progress towards meeting the targets set in the Directive has begun. However, an analysis of national report shows that policies and measures currently in place will probably achieve a renewable energy share of only 18%-19% of the electricity market in 2010. Administrative barriers such as long and complex authorisation procedures persist in some Member States due to insufficient coordination between different administrative bodies (Article 6). Current regulations on grid access do not guarantee a legal framework based on objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria (Article 7). Further progress in improving grid access for electricity from renewable energy is essential for stable growth. Slow growth in the biomass sector is caused by inadequate support systems and a lack of coordinated policies. Support systems and policy refinements should be improved to enhance biomass energy use taking into account biomass potentials at regional and national levels. Wind energy has grown impressively in three Member States and this success story should be extended to other Member States, implementing the success factors mentioned in Chapter 2.8.1. But even the booming of wind energy will not be enough to outweigh the slow development of biomass. Extra efforts are needed, notably in the different biomass uses, offshore wind and financial support in general. Support also needs to continue for geothermal, mini-hydro and photovoltaic power (Japan has overtaken Europe in this field). The Commission will closely monitor the situation in all Member States and the full implementation of all requirements of the Directive in order to prepare follow-up actions. 3. EFFORTS AND RESULTS FOR 2010 3.1. The legislative framework developed since 2000 Since 1997, the EU15 have been working towards the general target of an increase in renewable energy’s share of gross inland energy consumption to 12% in 2010, compared with 5.2% in 1995. To achieve this target, the Commission has adopted and proposed a considerable number of new legal instruments since 2000 aimed at promoting renewable energy and energy efficiency. The European Parliament and Council have adopted most of these proposals. The remainder are at an advanced stage of the inter-institutional process. The legal instruments that have been adopted into law are notably: - Directive 2001/77/EC on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources (OJ L283/33, 27.10.2001) - Directive 2003/30/EC on the promotion of biofuels (OJ L123/42, 17.5.2003) - Directive 2002/91/EC on energy performance of buildings (OJ L1/65, 4.1.2003) - Directive 2004/8/EC on the promotion of cogeneration (OJ L52/50, 21.2.2004) - Directive 2003/96/EC for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 283/51, 31.10.2003) - Directive 2000/55/EC on energy efficiency requirements for ballasts for fluorescent lighting (OJ L279/33, 01.11.2000) - Commission Directive 2002/40/EC on labelling of electric ovens (OJ L128/45, 15.05.2002) - Commission Directive 2002/31/EC on labelling of airconditioners (OJ L86/26, 03.04.2003) - Commission Directive 2003/66/EC on labelling of refrigerators (OJ L170/10, 09.07.2003) - Regulation 2422/2001/EC on Energy Star labelling for office equipment (OJ L332/1, 15.12.2001) And the proposals: - COM (2003)453 of 01.08.2003 on Eco design requirements for energy using products - COM (2003)739 of 10.12.2003 on energy efficiency and energy services The impact of one measure – Directive 2001/77/EC – was analysed above. The impact of others will be addressed in this chapter. Calculation of their impact is possible on the assumption of full compliance and rigid implementation by national, regional and local authorities. However, the example of Directive 2001/77/EC demonstrates that this should not be taken for granted. There is abroad consensus that the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) will have a positive effect of the renewable energy uptake in the EU from 2005 onwards. In addition, the recently agreed Linking Directive will have a similar impact on the uptake of these technologies in developing countries and in economies in transition The EU ETS will by itself not guarantee that the 2010 target renewable targets will be reached as the scheme only covers the greenhouse gas benefits of renewable energies. The positive effect will affect the 2010 extrapolations, although this might be premature as the allocation of allowance has not yet been finalised. It should also be taken into account that several measures, especially in the field of energy efficiency, will not have their full effect in the short or even the medium term (e.g. building improvements). This means that for these measures extrapolation of current trends is not possible and prognoses for 2010 can not yet include their full effect. 3.2. Member State Actions Over the last two years, Member States have been implementing new policies in renewable energy. Legal frameworks are more structured and financial conditions are clearer. But the overall picture is not so positive. There exists an imbalance between different countries’ commitment to develop renewable energy. The situation would be very different if wind energy performed across the Community at the level achieved by Denmark, Germany and Spain if biomass heating was as dynamic everywhere as it is in Finland or if geothermal energy managed the level of development being achieved in Sweden and Italy. At Community level, the necessary legal and policy framework has been put in place, but responsibility for progress lies clearly with the Member States. Now is the time for Member States to step up their own action at local, regional and national level. Member States are invited to maximise the use of the funds made available through the Structural Funds, to promote actions in favour of the renewables. 3.3. Community support instruments The Community has only limited means for funding renewable energies. It can only intervene as a catalyst and supporting actor. The following actions were undertaken. 3.3.1. Community support programmes Intelligent Energy – Europe programme (2003-2006) [10] The multiannual programme Intelligent Energy – Europe (EIE) adopted in June 2003 builds on the success of programmes Save and Altener which have supported actions in the fields of energy efficiency and renewable energy since the early 1990s. It is important to note the growth of the Community budget allocated to action in Member States. The combined budget for both previous programmes in the decade 1993-2002 was 220 million euros, while the budget allocated to the new programme for the period 2003-2006 is 250 million euros. EIE is intended to improve energy efficiency (Save actions), to promote new and renewable energy sources (Altener actions), to support initiatives tackling the energy aspects of transport (Steer) and to promote renewable energy and energy efficiency in developing countries (Coopener). The EIE programme supports the implementation of Community legislation by catalysing national, regional and local efforts across the EU. It focuses on the removal of non-technical barriers, the creation of market opportunities, the drawing-up of standards and the setting up of training structures as well as on the development-planning and monitoring tools. It complements the RTD programmes, by tackling the market barriers which are frequently identified when implementing demonstration projects. It also encourages actions by local communities and by municipal and regional administrations and agencies, which are vital to establish sustainable markets for renewable energy. The increasing importance and volume of the Community support has lead to the creation of the Executive Agency for Intelligent Energy to assist the Commission in the implementation of the EIE programme. Research, Technological Development and Demonstration The Sixth RTD Framework Programme (2002-2006)[11] contributes to the Union’s efforts to promote sustainable development and the knowledge-based economy. Priority 6 of the current programme includes Sustainable Energy Systems. From a total RTD budget of €17.500 million, €810 million have been allocated to Sustainable Energy Systems: €405 million for medium and long-term research and €405 million for medium and short-term demonstration. The short to medium term part of the programme concentrates on five research priorities: - cost-effective supply of renewable energies, - large-scale integration of renewable energy, - eco-buildings, - polygeneration, - alternative motor fuels. Within this part of the Programme the Commission has launched a major initiative – Concerto – which supports demonstration projects that are focused on optimising the energy flows in local communities through innovative integration of renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies. This initiative also addresses the important objective of involving local communities in sustainable development activities. A similar initiative – Civitas – draws both on transport and research budgets to promote sustainable urban transport, including alternative motor fuels. The Commission has also launched several major initiatives including the Hydrogen and Photovoltaics Technology Platforms designed to provide a long-term vision and strategic roadmaps in these two key technologies. In relation to renewable energies, the medium to longer term research programme includes the following research priorities: - new and advanced concepts in renewable energy technologies, - new technologies for energy carriers/transport and storage, in particular hydrogen, - fuel cells, including their applications, - socio-economic, energy and environmental modelling. Besides, the Commission is launching two major initiatives in the field of Land Use and of Agriculture, which seek to contribute to design the EU Sustainable Development Strategy through the development of tools and methods for impact assessment of alternative policies. Among the agricultural and forestry land uses that will be considered, attention will be given to the production of biomass for renewable energy purposes. Finally, under the umbrella of the Environment Technologies Action Plan launched by the Directorate General for Research, renewable energy technologies will be analysed and promoted. 3.3.2. Dissemination – Public Awareness Campaigns The Campaign for Take-Off (2000-2003) The Commission launched the Campaign for Take-Off (CTO) for Renewable Energies[12] in 1999. It aimed to provide quantitative targets for 8 renewable energy sectors, serving as benchmarks for decision makers and planners to disseminate successful initiatives and to spread best practice and to raise the awareness of decision makers at local, regional, national and European level. More than 125 renewable energy programmes and projects involving more than 600 partner organisations in the European Union – municipalities, agencies, technological institutes, regional authorities, national institutions, universities and enterprises – joined the Campaign as Renewable Energy Partners in 2000-2003. 3.4. Achieving the 12% target – the impact of Community legislation 3.4.1. Energy efficiency legislation Energy efficiency is as important as renewable energy in increasing security of energy supply and reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. EU energy efficiency policy has developed in a different way from policy for renewable energy. Renewable energy policy began with a general target (the “12% target”). Next came sectoral directives for electricity and transport. EU energy efficiency legislation dealt with individual products first. Before 2000, it covered minimum energy efficiency and labelling requirements for a variety of products – plus a voluntary agreement with car makers (the “ACEA agreement”).[13] In the years since 2000 the Union has continued with energy efficiency legislation for individual products, setting efficiency requirements for ballasts (a component of fluorescent lights)[14] and new labelling requirements for refrigerators, freezers, air-conditioners and household electric ovens.[15] At the same time, the Union began to adopt legislation that addresses energy efficiency across whole sectors with directives covering energy efficiency in buildings, and combined heat and power.[16] In mid-2003 the Commission proposed a framework Directive on Ecodesign for energy using products that should make it possible to set active minimum efficiency requirements or to promote the voluntary agreements in this field. Finally and most recently, the Commission has proposed establishing for the Union a general energy efficiency target – by law. The Energy Services Directive would require Member States to reduce the amount of energy distributed to final customers by 1% a year. The European Parliament and Council are currently considering Commission proposals for directives on Ecodesign and on Energy efficiency and energy services. Energy efficiency measures can make it easier to achieve the 12% target for renewable energy by reducing the total volume of energy consumption against which this share is calculated. The table shows the estimated impact of the adopted energy efficiency legislation on total EU15 energy consumption by 2010. +++++ TABLE +++++ The Commission predicts that as a result of this new legislation total EU15 energy consumption in 2010 will be 1556 Mtoe, rather than 1578 Mtoe under the Commission’s baseline scenario. It should be emphasised that this estimate is not a full assessment of the impact of EU legislation because several measures will have their main impact only after 2010. Directive 2002/91/EC on energy performance of buildings addresses the household and tertiary sector responsible for around 40% of the final energy demand in EU. The long term potential for energy savings is estimated at around 22%. The Directive introduces a common methodology for integrated energy performance standards for buildings, including integration of renewable energy supply and cogeneration. The standards are applied not only to new buildings but also in the event of the major renovation of large existing buildings. Buildings and dwellings must be certified when sold or rented out and energy saving measures must be identified. Boilers, heating and cooling installations must be inspected regularly and possible energy savings assessed. The Directive is to be transposed into Member States legislation at the latest in 2006. The impact by 2010 is estimated to be primary energy savings of 9 Mtoe and reduced CO2-emissions of 20 mtCO2. This estimate is based on a model in which a fixed amount of improvement occurs each year, and this over a 6 year period. Directive 2004/8/EC on the promotion of cogeneration aims to increase the share of high-efficiency cogeneration from the present level (2000) of 10% of all electricity consumption in EU. The Directive clarifies that good quality cogeneration of heat and power (CHP) saves at least 10% of primary energy consumption compared with separate production. Average primary energy savings are likely to be around 20-25%. The potential share that can be delivered by high-efficiency cogeneration has earlier been calculated at 18% in 2010, but this will be reconsidered in the light of the reports Member States are due to make in 2006 on their national potential for high-efficiency cogeneration. Guaranteed grid access on fair terms, streamlining of administrative procedures and a system offering a guarantee of origin to help operators to promote high-efficiency cogeneration are the other instruments in the Directive. The Directive is fuel-neutral. It will promote renewable energy cogeneration alongside fossil cogeneration. If the share of cogenerated electricity reaches 18% in 2010 this will result in primary energy savings of 18 Mtoe and a drop in CO2 emissions of 42 mtCO2 compared with a baseline of 13% CHP. The half-way scenario (15.5% CHP), shown in the table above, leads to primary energy savings of 10 Mtoe and emission reductions of 24 mtCO2. Energy efficiency should also be seen in a broad sense, like an extensive integration of processes both on the side of generation and consumption. Town planners inter alia have to be made aware of the substantial benefits of energy efficiency. 3.4.2. Legislation on electricity from renewable energy source The generation of electricity accounts for about 45% of the energy consumed in the EU25.[18] Electricity produced from renewable energy sources amounted to 384 TWh in the EU15 in 2001. This corresponds to a share of 15.2% (consolidated figures for 2002 are not yet available). A detailed analysis of the Directive on electricity from renewable sources has already been given in Chapter 2. 3.4.3. Biofuels By 2002, the market share of biofuels had peaked in France (1.3%). Across the whole EU15 the share of biofuels was 0.6% of the petrol and diesel market. In the Czech Republic biofuels had already a share of 1.3% of all automotive fuels in 2001. Poland has also adopted a new law on the promotion of biofuels entered into force on 1 January 2004. Biodiesel from oilseeds is the commonest biofuel. It is blended with diesel. Bioethanol, made from sugarbeet or wheat, comes second [and is growing apace]. It is blended with petrol, partly in the form of alcohol, partly after transformation into ETBE. Other biofuels, derived from wastes and residues, account for only a small share. Biofuels are relatively expensive although the additional costs are justified by benefits across several policy fields. In particular, they would provide additional and alternative supplies for fuelling the transport sector, which is almost completely dependent on one fuel – oil – and accounts for more than 30% of final energy consumption in the Community. Biofuels are at present the only technically viable means of using renewable energy to replace oil as a transport fuel. This means that biofuels offer particularly clear advantages in terms of security of supply. Some of these advantages could be derived from biofuel imports given that biofuel has a different geopolitical origin to oil. In addition, biofuels have a good employment balance – about 16 jobs per ktoe, nearly all in rural areas. Taking into account the advantages of biofuels in terms of climate change, security of supply and rural employment, in 2001 the Commission proposed legislation to set targets for the use of biofuels in transport. A second proposal allowed Member States to exempt biofuels from fuel taxation without needing the prior approval of the Commission. These proposals led in 2003 to the adoption by the Council and European Parliament of the biofuels directive[19] and a provision in the energy taxation directive.[20] The biofuels directive states that Member States “should ensure that a minimum proportion of biofuels and other renewable fuels is placed on their markets, and, to that effect, shall set national indicative targets”. It sets reference values for these targets: 2% by the end of 2005 and 5.75% by the end of 2010. Member States are to report to the Commission each year on the measures taken to promote biofuels and on the share of biofuels placed on the market in the previous year. The first report, due by the end of June 2004, must contain a national indicative target for 2005. The report due in 2007 must do the same for 2010. The Commission is required to report on progress by the end of 2006, and then every two years. If the report concludes that the indicative targets are not likely to be achieved for reasons that are unjustified, the Commission should make proposals that “address national targets, including possible mandatory targets, in the appropriate form”. The energy taxation directive states that – for as long as Community law does not lay down mandatory targets – Member States may exempt under fiscal control biofuels from fuel taxes, or apply a lower rate of tax. However, if Community law would impose mandatory targets, Member States could continue to grant tax reductions/exemptions in favour of biofuels through the procedure set by Article 19 of the Energy Tax Directive (proposal of the Commission, authorising decision by the Council). The present situation (as of March 2004) is that seven Member States have partly or completely detaxed biofuels (Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom). If the objectives set in the biofuels directive are achieved, the contribution of biofuels will increase from 1.4 Mtoe in 2001 to 19 Mtoe in 2010 – an increase of 18 Mtoe . The Commission will closely follow up the biofuels market and the transposition of the biofuels Directive, due for December 2004. The progress of biofuels up to 2010 and beyond will be strongly influenced by and depend on developments in fuel quality standards, namely the competitiveness of biofuels, the development of new biofuels technologies, and the sourcing of biomass for biofuels. 3.5. Renewable energy for heat production Renewable energy in heating has grown slowly over the last seven years. The directive on the promotion of cogeneration (CHP directive) and the Building directive have a direct impact on efficient heat use. But there is no legislation in place addressing renewable heat production. It is still a sector dominated by traditional biomass use and a new dynamism is needed to deliver the necessary contribution to achieve the objective of a 12% share in renewables and to develop the sound potential that exists in the new Member States. Heat from renewable energy sources is used in many different ways. Heat demand for industrial purposes often calls for high temperatures or steam at high pressure. For such requirements renewable heat will typically be provided via the combustion of biomass (wood or industrial waste and residues) preferably with co-firing of fossil fuels in boilers or CHP. When heat is needed for heating buildings and hot water, the demand can be met by a wider range of technologies and sources. For larger-scale demand such as district heating and major buildings (commercial/public/residential), centralised supply is possible and economies of scale can encourage investment in technology (large boilers, geothermal, CHP). Domestic heat demand and other small-scale demands can be met using other technologies such as solar panels, wood stoves, geothermal sources, etc. 3.5.1. The trend in geothermal Direct heat is the oldest and the commonest use to which geothermal energy is put. Space and district heating, agricultural applications and aquaculture and industrial uses are well known examples. Following the introduction of ground coupled heat pumps, space heating and cooling has expanded considerably over recent years. Sweden is at the top of the list with a capacity estimated at 1 GWth for 176,000 units in 2002, representing one-third of all the heat pumps installed in Europe. Germany and France come next. Italy is the leading country in the European Union for low-energy applications of geothermal energy with a capacity of 0.44 GWth, followed by France and Germany. With 10% annual growth for heat pumps (the 2002/2001 growth rate was 14%), the target calculated in 1997 of 5 GWth to be achieved by 2010 would be exceeded by 60%. Geothermal energy is a well-developed energy source in Hungary where the amount of power installed is similar to France. The Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Poland use this renewable energy source mainly in the form of direct heat. 3.5.2. Solar thermal heat. Solar thermal energy has taken off only in Germany, Greece, Austria and Cyprus. At the end of 2002 the installed surface of solar collectors in the EU15 was nearly 12.8 million square metres, compared with around 11.8 at the end of 2001. This increase was led by the German market. In 2002, 80% of the total solar thermal capacity of the EU15 was installed in the three leader countries. Austria, for example, has 9 times more thermal collectors than Spain. Among the new Member States, Cyprus stands out with about 600,000 square metres installed. Solar thermal collectors cover two thirds of the warm water needs of Greek households, in Cyprus up to 90%, and nearly 10% in Austria. In Spain, Portugal and Italy only a marginal 0.5% of warm water needs is covered. Solar thermal collector production has over the last four years grown at a rate of around 9%. However, unless far more significant steps are taken, the 1997 objective of installing 100 million m² of solar collectors in the EU15 by 2010 will not be achieved. 3.5.3. Biogas Since the “environment” has become a full-fledged economic sector, the biogas sector has undergone constant development in most of the countries of the European Union. Biogas has the dual advantage of eliminating pollution while producing energy at the same time. Methanisation units have appeared across Europe. The biogas sector gives a value to different types of waste. This gas can be used to produce electricity, heat or as transport fuel. 60% of biogas is used in electricity production and 40% in heat production. In 2002, EU15 biogas production was 2.8 Mtoe – 10% higher than in 2001. This growth rate is too slow to achieve the 15 Mtoe proposed for 2010. [pic] [pic] Biogas development needs coordinated policy in the fields of energy, environment and agriculture (cattle manure is one source of biogas). 3.5.4. Woody Biomass Most of the biomass needed for heating is still, as it always was, wood – especially domestic use of wood. The biomass market for space heating is stagnant. Significant incentives are needed to overcome this problem and to encourage more efficient wood-burning stoves and boilers. CHP generation is a good option for the industrial-scale use of wood. The mid-term potential for the EU15 shows a more balanced split between the three technologies considered: biomass heat, geothermal heat and solar thermal installations (geothermal heat includes geothermal heat pumps). Other forms of biomass, such as purpose-grown energy crops have been well proven and the technology and logistics to use them have been developed. They should be encouraged and significant incentives are initially necessary. [pic] Examples of good practice are the Austrian programme to commercialise the use of wood and the French “Plan du Bois” which promotes the installation of efficient individual stoves and communal heaters. All such means to disseminate the spread of efficient practices in the use of wood as a fuel are to be encouraged. 3.5.5. Summary There are some national success stories in woody biomass and solar heat. Geothermal heating is growing at a good speed. Nevertheless, the overall development of renewable energy in heating does not give rise to optimism. According to the figures shown in the table below, even if the targets for renewable electricity generation and biofuels are met, extra 29 Mtoe of renewable energy for heat production would still be needed to achieve the 12% objective by 2010. +++++ TABLE +++++ 3.6. Conclusion: Scenario for the renewable energy share in 2010 The trends set out in the Commission Staff Working Document lead to the conclusion that, although progress towards meeting the targets has begun, the 2010 target will not be achieved under current policies and measures. There is a strong need for more political will to invest in the EU into renewables. - The share of renewable energy increased from 5.4% in 1997 to 6% in 2001. - If present trends continue in heating , and if Member States implement the national plans they have put in place in electricity and fulfil the requirements of the biofuels directive in transport , the share will reach 9% in 2010. - In addition, if Member States fulfil in full the requirements of the directive on electricity from renewable energy sources, the share will reach 10% . - Fulfilment of the 12% target for 2010 will require a step change in national policies towards the use of renewable energy in heating. +++++ TABLE +++++ 4. CONCRETE ACTIONS 4.1. New initiatives to reinforce the financing of renewable energy – action by Member States Growth in the use of renewable energy is too slow to give confidence that the European Union’s targets for 2010 will be met. In electricity, the European Council and Parliament agreed in 2001 to aim for a renewable energy share of 22.1% in the EU15 by 2010. National targets adopted in 2002 were consistent with this objective. But the practical measures that Member States have put in place so far are estimated to deliver a share of only 18-19%. In heating, most Member States have done little to stimulate new action. In transport, only six Member States have made a start on the production of biofuels. Prospects will be clearer early in 2005 following transposition of the biofuels directive. For renewable energy as a whole, the Community has been working since 1997 towards a renewable energy share of 12% by 2010. At best, with present trends and measures, the share achieved will be 10%. At worst, it will not rise above 8%. Renewable energy’s contribution remains marginal in most Member States, apart from two old-established uses: electricity from hydropower and traditional uses of wood for heating. However, renewable energy has begun to move from the wings to centre stage. This move must gather pace if the Union is to meet its objectives for sustainable development and security of energy supply. At Community level, the necessary legal and policy framework has been put in place. Now it is time for Member States to speed up their own action at local, regional and national level. One important aspect is the financing of renewable energy. One estimate puts the gross investment cost for the EU15 to achieve the 12% target at €10-15 billion per year.[25] While Community funding plays a crucial catalytic role (see next section), the Community has still limited means to support the real development of renewable energy. Member States and the energy industries themselves have the resources needed to deliver this level of investment. +++++ TABLE +++++ 4.2. New initiatives to reinforce the renewable energy and energy efficiency – action at European level Clean energy policy shares fundamental goals with a wide range of such Community policies as enhancing competitiveness and cohesion for growth and employment, ensuring access to basic goods and services, and promoting the EU as a sustainable development partner.[26] Renewable energies and energy efficiency can do a great deal to address the challenges that other policies face. A coordinated approach is needed across the range of Community policies that have energy impacts. The Union’s future financial framework for 2007-2013 should have explicit provisions so that clean and efficient energy concepts are a visible part of the Union’s priorities, strategies and commitments. It is the opportunity for the enlarged Union to express its political determination to change course and direct its efforts towards sustainable energy, by allocating adequate resources to boost its goals in this field. The Community’s main financial instruments – notably the future structural and cohesion funds, the financial support made available through the Community’s international co-operation programmes, and the Common Agricultural Policy – all need to be mobilised. In this respect, it is important to note that in February 2004 the Commission adopted a Communication regarding the reform of structural funds for the period 2007-2013. This report highlights the development and use of renewable energy, energy efficiency measures, the development of eco-industries, cleaner methods of transport and sustainable urban public transport as priority themes for future support. Supplementary action could be explored in four fronts. First, to bridge the gap between successful demonstration of innovative technologies and their effective entrance on the market to achieve mass deployment and to boost large-scale investment across the EU in new and best performing technologies. To achieve this, a new instrument is needed that operating at EU level could be tailored to accommodate the diversity and specificity of the renewables and energy efficiency sectors. This instrument should support the first market replications of just-proven technologies of European relevance. In this way the Union will share the risk that is involved in the economic exploitation of RTD results. This new instrument could be the main component of the successor to the current “Intelligent Energy-Europe, 2003-2006” programme. It would ensure better exploitation (through large-scale application across the Union and on export markets) of projects’ results and promote the substantial stock of technologies that are close to being competitive. Action at EU level, in concert with national initiatives and with action by international financial institutions, is needed to tackle this task effectively. Second, this future Community programme “Intelligent Energy Europe” should also strengthen support for action at local and regional level . The main aim is to enable citizens to make informed decisions about energy and help to remove non-technological barriers to clean energy such as institutional capacity, public awareness, available technology at affordable prices, well-trained specialists and effective mechanisms for the exchange of know-how and best practice. A better focus is also needed for sharing European experience and technologies with third countries. This future programme should also continue to support the EU policy development and implementation in the renewables and energy efficiency fields. Third, it is necessary to strengthen support and accelerate the pace of public support for research, technological development and demonstration in renewables and energy efficiency in Europe. Fourth, it is necessary to capitalise on the important role that energy plays in sustainable development and share the responsibility with other Community policies . In the framework of the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy a new aid of 45 € per hectare will be introduced for areas sown to energy crops. Furthermore, non-food production, for instance of energy crops will continue to be permitted on set-aside land. The European Investment Bank has already set itself the target of increasing the share of renewable energy in its loans for energy from 8% to 16%. It could contribute to the financing of national, regional or private investment funds for renewable energy, along with contributions from other public sources at Community, national or regional level. 4.3. Other measures 4.3.1. A Community plan for biomass In 2001 the EU15 used about 56 Mtoe of biomass for energy purposes. Achieving the Union’s renewable energy targets for 2010 would need approximately 74 Mtoe more – 32 Mtoe for electricity generation, about 18 in the form of biofuels and 24 for heating (total: 130 Mtoe) An indicative figure on the biomass availability for energy purposes at EU15 level is 150 Mtoe (additional 32 Mtoe for EU-10 and Romania and Bulgaria).[27] The biomass potential needs further assessment, especially in terms of land availability, land use for different renewable biomass applications (heat, electricity, transport biofuels, and forest products) and the difference in benefits these various applications might have, for instance in terms of greenhouse gas emissions in a life cycle perspective. However, effective use of biomass for energy purposes depends on the market developments as well as on the interactions between public policy in the fields of energy, agricultural, waste, forestry, industry, rural development, environment and trade policy. Community institutions play a key role in all these policy areas. By the end of 2005, the Commission will bring forward a coordinated biomass plan with a clear approach to securing adequate supplies of biomass through European, national and regional/local action across them all. This plan should ensure that the use of biomass for energy purposes does not lead to the undue distortion of competition. The plan will orientate and optimise Community financial mechanisms, re-direct effort within the policies concerned and tackle the obstacles to biomass deployment for energy purposes. Specific attention will be paid to the new Member States, taking into account the high and unexploited biomass potential that many of them have. 4.3.2. Developing renewable energy in heating Targets for renewable energy sources’ heating would be difficult to establish because there is no single “heating supply industry” to whom they could be addressed. Instead, some specific initiative linked to heating and cooling applications will be brought forward as a first step. The Community has already adopted directives on the energy performance of buildings[28] and cogeneration[29]. These will encourage greater use of renewable energy in heating. There is a need for the buildings directive to be implemented in a way that stimulates the integration of efficient biomass systems, geothermal heat pumps and solar thermal heating in residential and tertiary-sector buildings. The decentralised energy supply based on renewable energy that is envisaged under the Buildings Directive should look to the potential of using renewable energy for heating and cooling, in particular through integrating solar heating panels in buildings. Micro-turbines fired by biomass are another possibility for using renewable energy in buildings. There is also a need to encourage a greater share of biomass in cogeneration and in district heating systems, especially where existing systems can be economically refurbished (which is the case in many of the new Member States). The Commission will bring forward further initiatives – if necessary, legislative proposals – to accelerate the fulfilment of the potential of three key technologies – modern biomass heating, solar heating and geothermal heat. These initiatives could include targets for specific technologies, or requirements for suppliers of heating oil and gas to supply e.g. wood pellets and biogas. 4.3.3. Offshore wind policy To give legal certainty for offshore wind development, governments will need to establish legal regimes that give them relevant jurisdiction for the area outside the territorial seas (12 nautical mile limit), and quick procedures for giving consent for development. An off-shore wind policy for the EU will need to strengthen the necessary grid infrastructure. The Trans-European Energy Networks Programme has started to support investments for the grid adaptation and optimisation for the integration of off-shore projects. It is important to ensure that the development of offshore wind is not stifled by a false assessment of potential problems such as its coexistence with birds, trawling and shipping, the development and application of national planning rules, the source of funds to extend and upgrade the grid, the availability of insurance cover and the provision of legal protection against damage to structures outside states’ territorial waters. The Commission will systematically review the obstacles and objections that may block the development of offshore wind, the environmental requirements that need to be met and will develop guidelines for Member States, by offering proposals for legislation if necessary. The Commission will also support research and development support to improve turbines and installation technology for use at sea and to improve the stability of the grid for wind energy penetration above 20%. It will also encourage the coordination of research being sponsored by national authorities on the effects of wind turbines on marine life and the marine environment. 4.3.4. Electricity from solar irradiation Contrary to Japan, a strategically conscious industry policy, systematically developing towards a multi 10 billion € business is lacking in Europe. Despite the growth rate of European production during the last years and the strong European RTD and innovation base available, Europe is still a net importer of photovoltaic cells. Continued, but evermore targeted RTD funding leads to new developments with respect to raw material use, evermore benign production technologies, optimised, often building integrated device design, reliability and efficiency of PV systems. A further option is solar thermal electricity production, with some promising pilot projects just being launched in Southern Europe. This technology has the additional advantage that it can be cost-effectively combined with modern gas turbines, therefore overcoming the problem of intermittency of the solar irradiation and enabling a base load share of solar energy without storage technology. 4.3.5. Research and technological development Several renewable energy technologies that could make a big contribution by 2020 need more research and development. The European Union has played a leading role in renewable energy research, demonstration and dissemination for more than 20 years and will continue to do so. OECD data indicate that only 10% of government energy R&D budgets are related to renewable energy, in contrast with more than 50% for conventional (fossil fuel and nuclear) energy technologies. As indicated in paragraph 4.2, and in order to support the longer term expectations regarding the penetration of renewables, it is therefore necessary to strengthen support and accelerate the pace of public support for research, technological development and demonstration in renewables in Europe. Under the 6th Framework Programme, the Union is focussing on bringing costs down and on the large-scale integration of renewable energies in the energy supply system. For the short to medium term the programme is addressing electricity production from biomass, wind, photovoltaic power, tidal stream, wave and other renewable sources, heating and cooling technology, and the production and processing of liquid and gaseous biofuels. Long-term research looks at how to achieve significant cost reductions in bio-energy, photovoltaics, and other renewable energies including wind, ocean, concentrated solar, and geothermal as well as improving the reliability, safety, availability and durability of renewable energy systems. The programme also addresses the issues of distributed electricity generation, hydrogen and fuel cells which have an impact on the further development of renewable energy systems. 4.3.6. Using major Community financing instruments The Commission intends from 2004 onwards to place special emphasis on the deployment of renewable energy and energy efficiency by using the structural and cohesion funds, and the EU development funds. Renewable energies could also play in the future an important role in the further evolution of the relevant rural development measures (second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy). 4.3.7. Placing biofuels on the market The fuel quality directive[30] lays down minimum specifications for gasoline and diesel. These limit the blending of biofuels. Higher blending limits would make it easier to fulfil and go beyond a 5.75% share for biofuels. The scope for raising these limits is the subject of technical debate. The Commission is evaluating the arguments. It will bring forward new proposals, if necessary, by the end of 2005. Member States may require each company to place on the market on the Member State’s territory a given quantity of biofuels, but may not require that all fuel sold is blended with biofuels. Alongside its review of fuel quality specifications the Commission will consider whether this needs to change. 4.3.8. Timely data Official European data on renewable energy sources’ contribution is currently available about 18 months after the end of the calendar year in question. The Commission will make data available more quickly. It will examine how extrapolation from samples could give an earlier indication of progress and how data gathering could be linked to the certification of renewable energy, as well as techno-scientific efforts to identify and validate trends. 5. INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL CONTEXT AND EU PERSPECTIVES BEYOND 2010 5.1. The Lisbon process and the environmental dimension The European Council of Lisbon of March 2000 agreed in its Conclusions (5) on a “ new strategic goal for the next decade: to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion” . +++++ TABLE +++++ The wind industry currently employs 75 000 people in the EU15. The German Government has confirmed the net creation of 135 000 jobs through its national policy on renewable energy up to 2003. Nearly 100% of renewable energy production uses European technology. Increasing the share of renewable energy sources creates new jobs – in research, industry and building sectors, agro and forest-based industry, waste treatment and consulting – by developing new technologies and by encouraging research and technical innovation. It is estimated that if renewable energy supplies 12% of EU15 energy consumption in 2010, the sector will employ between 500 000 and 650 000 people in serving this EU market. It is for Member States to decide to put in place an energy policy that can deliver significant employment benefits. European industry is the world leader in wind technology and holds a good position in hydro, photovoltaic and geothermal power. Export markets constitute a huge potential for the European renewable energy industry, which will benefit from the expertise gained in the domestic market. Export of renewable energy technology will create a significant number of extra jobs. The Göteborg European Council of June 2001 agreed on a strategy for sustainable development and added an environmental dimension to the Lisbon process. In its Conclusions (21) it “invites the industry to take part in the development and wider use of new environmentally friendly technologies in sectors such as energy and transport” and “stresses the importance of decoupling economic growth from resource use.” 5.2. The Johannesburg conference and its follow-up The World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Johannesburg in September 2002, addressed the broad aspects of sustainable development with a strong focus, on the need to alleviate poverty as a matter of urgency. One of the main outcomes of the WSSD, was the general acceptance that energy, and in particular renewable energy, was one of the key priorities to alleviate poverty and to achieve long-term sustainable development. In Johannesburg, the EU committed itself to taking a lead through the EU Energy Initiative for Poverty Reduction and Sustainable Development (EUEI) and through the Johannesburg Renewable Energy Coalition (JREC). One of the first concrete actions taken by the Commission in support of the EUEI was to launch COOPENER within the Intelligent Energy – Europe programme, to encourage the provision of sustainable energy services for poverty alleviation in developing countries. +++++ TABLE +++++ Since its launch, JREC developed its activities in close partnership and with the support of a broad stakeholder community, including business, NGOs and academia. JREC membership is nevertheless the privilege of national governments. As of March 2004, 87 countries joined the Coalition and more are expected to do so. JREC meetings have already offered a unique platform for a constructive dialogue between many governments from the Northern and Southern hemisphere. In this context, and based on discussion amongst JREC Members following the WSSD, it is for example clearly acknowledged that the respective member-governments are best placed to develop and adopt ambitious national and regional time-bound targets. JREC Members are equally committed to identify and remove financing gaps and obstacles, including obstacles for the effective delivery of existing – but often untapped – public and private resources needed to develop and strengthen renewable energy markets with a particular focus on the needs of developing country members. JREC priorities and actions have been developed during informal high-level conferences and meetings, which have also served as a high-level platform to increase the regional and international awareness of the actions undertaken by pro-active governments thereby also assisting them in attracting interest from the finance and business community. The International Conference for Renewable Energy, to be held in Bonn in June 2004, will follow up the Johannesburg conference. It aims to produce a strong political declaration together with an ambitious international action plan accompanied including various commitments and guidance for good policy. In its capacity of hosting the JREC secretariat, the Commission started two key initiatives, to support the JREC and in particular the developing country members[31], i.e.: - A global on-line renewable energy policy and measures database to tackle the significant information deficit in the area of policy design and implementation, in particular at the level of non-OECD countries; - A feasibility study for the creation a public-private fund-based mechanism for the creation and delivery of “patient risk capital” to offer renewable energy business and project developers – in particular in developing countries and economies in transition, increased access to risk capital and to encourage a more significant engagement from international and local financial intermediaries and corporate investors.[32] The Commission will further develop these cross-cutting actions with interested JREC members and other stakeholders. In January 2004, a European preparatory conference organised by the European Commission and held in Berlin concluded that: - Implementation of Community Directives in Member States should provide for long-term domestic support that guarantees stable investment conditions. Administrative barriers to the distribution of green electricity should be overcome and progress is needed in the field of intelligent grid management. - Progress achieved in Europe concerning renewable energy consumption reveals that, while electricity production, mainly from wind, is increasing dramatically, biomass electricity and technologies for the production of heat and cooling are not progressing enough. In addition, Member States’ efforts are very unbalanced. The heating and cooling sector is calling on the Commission to propose Community initiatives. - Distortion of the energy market, mainly due to the fact that energy prices do not reflect the full socio-economic costs, was highlighted as a barrier to create a level-playing field. The principle “polluter-pays” should be applied to energy. Concerning renewable energy targets, there was a common understanding that the EU general renewable energy target for 2010 has been a driving force in the legislative and policy process at domestic and European levels. This long-term approach needs to be carried forward. The conference noted that a range of technical studies suggest a target of at least 20% of gross inland consumption in 2020 for the enlarged EU25.[33] 5.3. The role of targets at EU level Since 1997 EU policy has been guided by the objective of a 12% share of renewable energy. A number of Member States have set national targets for the share of renewable energy sources in their national energy mix and this should be encouraged. The Commission has proposed and the Council and the European Parliament have adopted operational targets for 2010 on electricity from renewable energy sources and biofuels. Moreover a large range of legal measures in efficiency and support measures have been adopted at EU level. Because development is still too slow to reach the 12% objective, the present Communication announces additional measures. It is now time for all Member States to use the legal tools that have been developed at Community level in order to deliver on these operational targets and to increase the share of renewable energy sources in their national energy mix to such an extent that the 12% objective for the EU can be attained. In April 2004, the European Parliament considered the recommendations of the Berlin Conference. It urged the Commission and the Council to start a political process of setting ambitious, time tabled targets for increasing the share of renewable energy in final energy consumption, addressing the medium and long-term time frame in advance of the International Conference in Bonn, and called upon the Commission and the Council to make the necessary efforts to reach a target of 20% for the contribution by renewable energy to domestic energy consumption in the EU by 2020.[34] The Commission acknowledges the importance of providing a longer term perspective, considering in particular the infant nature of the renewable energy industry and the need to ensure sufficient investors’ security. Acknowledging the outcome of the currently available feasibility studies, however, the Commission considers it necessary to more thoroughly assess the impacts of RES resources, notably with regard to their global economic effects before deciding on adopting targets beyond 2010 and before taking a position on the above-mentioned 20% target for the share of renewable energy in 2020. The Commission will carry out regular reviews of progress in the development of renewable energy sources, with the aim also of ensuring compatibility with its overall sustainable development strategy. This will require an extended impact analysis of its policy. In the case of the economic dimension this will take into account the competitiveness of the EU economy on the one hand, and the security of supply on the other hand, as well as its technical feasibility. In the case of the environmental dimension, the required contribution to EU goals on climate change and other environmental priorities will be addressed. Finally the potential for the development of renewable energy resources should also be taken into account. This review will be carried out for the first time not later than the end of October 2005 with a view to opening a debate in order to set in 2007 a target for the period after 2010. By starting the process for establishing a longer term perspective for renewable energy, the European Commission wants to contribute to the continued leadership already shown by some JREC members, including some EU Member States. 6. Secinājumi Atjaunojamajai enerģijai ir potenciāls. Tas ir nozīmīgi situācijā, kad ES energoapgādei ir strukturālas problēmas un ģeopolitiskas, sociālas un apkārtējās vides nepilnības, jo īpaši attiecībā uz Eiropas saistībām, kurās tā ir uzņēmusies, ievērojot Kioto protokolu. Attīstot Eiropas potenciālu atjaunojamās enerģijas izmantošanas jautājumā, tas sekmēs energoapgādes drošību, samazinās degvielas importa apjomu un atkarību no importa, samazinās gāzu izplūdi, kas rada siltumnīcas efektu, uzlabos apkārtējās vides aizsardzību, nesaistīs ekonomisko izaugsmi ar resursu izmantošanu, izveidos darbavietas un konsolidēs centienus virzībā uz sabiedrību, kura pamatojas uz zināšanām. Ir pienācis laiks nodrošināt šā potenciāla apmierināšanu, lai samazinātu nabadzību un uzlabotu nabadzīgāko cilvēku piekļuvi enerģijai. Tomēr, ciktāl tas skar Eiropas Savienību, turpmākie soļi ir jāveic daudzās dalībvalstīs, lai paātrinātu atjaunojamās enerģijas izmantošanas apmēru un tādējādi nodrošinātu Savienības mērķu sasniegšanu. Eiropas Savienībai šis paziņojums ir pamats ziņojumam par šobrīd sasniegto attīstības līmeni un ļautu izdarīt šādus secinājumus: a) Vispārējie ES reglamentējošie noteikumi tiek īstenoti pēdējo četru gadu laikā; b) ES mērķi 2010. gadam tiks sasniegti, tikai pilnīgi īstenojot šo tiesisko regulējumu no dalībvalstu puses kopā ar papildu aktivizējošiem pasākumiem, kas pielāgoti nacionālajiem nosacījumiem; c) Papildu pasākumi – īpaši finanšu pasākumu, kas minēti 2.9. un 4. nodaļā – arī ir nepieciešami ES līmenī. Kā ieguldījumu 2004. gada jūnija Bonnas atjaunojamās enerģijas konferences labā , paziņojumā izklāstīta Komisijas pieeja atjaunojamās enerģijas politikai. [1] „Ceļā uz Eiropas enerģijas piegādes drošības stratēģiju”, KOM (2000) 769. [2] „Sadarbība ar jaunattīstības valstīm enerģētikas nozarē ”, KOM (2002) 408. [3] „Vēja enerģija – fakti” (Eiropas Vēja enerģijas asociācija, 2004) sniedz izmaksas vislabākajam vēja enerģijas ražošanas pasūtījumam 4 līdz 5 eirocentu apmērā par vienu kWh. „Atjaunojamie resursi enerģijas ražošanai” (Starptautiskā Enerģētikas aģentūra, 2003.) sniedz fotogalvaniskās enerģijas ražošanas izmaksas par vismaz 17 eirocentiem par vienu kWh; un biomasas elektrostaciju izmaksas ir 7 eirocenti par vienu kWh vai vairāk. Tomēr izmaksas var samazināt, ja biomasa izmanto apvienotajās siltuma elektrostacijās un atomelektrostacijās (pat no 5 līdz 6 eirocentiem par vienu kWh) vai kopapstrādei ar degizraksteņiem, ja neveic ieguldījumu izmaksas par jaudas ciklu (pat no 2 līdz 4 eirocentiem par vienu kWh). Salīdznājumam - elektrības vairumtirdzniecības cena, kuru ražoja tradicionālās elektrostacijas pašreiz ir apmēram 3 eirocenti par vienu kWh. Komisijas paziņojuma par „Alternatīvās degvielas ceļu transportam un par pasākumu kopumu, lai sekmētu biodegvielas izmantošanu” (KOM (2001) 547) noteiktā pasūtījuma cena ir EUR 500 par 1000 litriem biodegvielas, salīdzinājumā ar EUR 200 līdz 250 par 1000 litriem naftas degvielas, ja barels ir USD 30. [4] Direktīva 2001/77/EK par elektroenerģijas ražošanas, kas ir ražota no atjaunojamās enerģijas avotiem iekšējā tirgū, veicināšanu. [5] Direktīva 2003/30/EK par transporta biodegvielu un citu atjaunojamo degvielu izmantošanas veicināšanu. Rādītāji iekļauj desmit dalībvalstu devumu. 2000. gadā ES 15 rādītājs bija 0,7%. [6] Sweden has set a target for 2010 of an additional 10 TWh of electricity from renewable energy sources other than hydro, compared with 2002. The Swedish hydro fi畧敲gures are based on an average calculated on a 50 year base. This makes it difficult to convert the figures given by Sweden into a percentage. [7] Source: Wind energy –The Facts – March 2003. [8] Source: Eurostat. Non-consolidated figures. [9] The 22% objective does not detail the penetration of the different sources of RES-E. It is the Member States’ responsibility to detail the mix of renewables. Therefore, the sectoral breakdown of the target sketched here must be treated only as an estimate. [10] Decision No 1230/2003/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning a multiannual programme for action in the field of energy, OJ L 176 of 15.7.2003, p 29. [11] Decision No 1513/2002/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of concerning the Sixth Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006), OJ L232 , 29.08.2002 [12] Commission staff working paper – Energy for the future: Renewable Sources of Energy (Community Strategy and Action Plan) – Campaign for Take-Off, SEC (1999) 504 [13] Although this agreement is expressed in terms of reductions in CO2 emissions, it is being implemented mainly through improvements to the energy efficiency of cars. [14] Directive 2000/55/EC on energy efficiency requirements for ballasts for fluorescent lighting (OJ L279, 01.11.2000) [15] Directive 2003/66/EC of 03.07.2003 amending Directive 94/2/EC implementing Council Directive 92/75/EC with regard to energy labelling of household electric refrigerators, freezers and their combination, OJEU L170, 09.07.2003 [16] Directive 2002/91/EC on the energy performance in buildings, OJ L1, 04.01.2003; Directive 2004/8/EC on the promotion of cogeneration, OJ L52, 21.02.2004 [17] Commission endorsed voluntary programmes , which will save at least another 1 Mtoe: GreenLight, Motor Challenge, the standby-power saving agreements for Digital TV and Power Supplies, and the CEMEP motor Agreement. [18] Substitution method; this is a share of gross consumption not final consumption; excluding non-energy uses. [19] Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 08.05.2003 on the promotion of the use of the biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport, OJ L123, 17.05.2003 [20] Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27.10.2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, OJ L283, 31.10.2003 [21] The 72 Mtoe is the updated scenario. [22] Under an efficient scenario for electricity consumption, this 630 TWh will be equivalent to 84 Mtoe [23] Under a BAU scenario for electricity consumption, this 660 TWh will be equivalent to 93 Mtoe [24] In the case of biofuels, the figure given is in final energy. [25] A. Zervos, “Updating the impact of the Community strategy and action plan for renewable energy sources”, draft final report, 2003 (based upon 2001 prices). [26] Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament “Building our Common Future: Policy challenges and Budgetary means of the Enlarged Union 2007-2013”, COM(2004) 101 final of 10.2.2004 [27] The estimation of this figure considers 10% of the arable land (half for biofuels and half from solid biomass), forest by-products, wet manure and organic waste. Source BTG Interim Report. [28] Directive 2002/91/EC on the energy performance in buildings, OJ L1, 04.01.2003 [29] Directive 2004/8/EC on the promotion of cogeneration, OJ L52, 21.02.2004 [30] Directive 98/70 of 13.10.1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels (OJ L350/58, 28.12.1998), amended by directive 2003/17 of 03.03.2003 (OJ L76/10, 22.03.2003) [31] The Commission has carefully selected and developed these initiatives in view of the developing country needs whilst also considering the need to complement existing and new instruments developed under the COOPENER, EU EI and other related programmes. [32] This study is carried out by a consortium of financial engineers, private equity layers and technology consultants. Provided it could be established, patient risk capital would be a type of equity or quasi-equity finance obtained from blending public and private sector investment resources and requirements. It would provide equity funding in the expectation of a return, but on a less demanding basis than pure market private equity capital. [33] This target would be equivalent to about 23% under the “substitution approach”. The use of the substitution approach would have several advantages. It would give a more balanced reflection of the contribution of different forms of renewable energy, reflect the objectives of renewable energy policy in terms of substitutions for the use of fossil fuels and thus reducing CO2 emissions and improving security of supply and allow a clearer comparison between the effects of renewable energy and energy efficiency measures. [34] P5_TA-PROV(2004)0276 International Conference on Renewable Energy (Bonna, 2004. gada jūnijs). QRäåæç- z|~€‚ˆŠ’”îðòôöüþbdfhjprxz¦¨¬®°² | ( ) * + , - Z [ \ ] ^ õìèÞèìèÚÊÂèÂÚ»ÊèÊÂèÂÚ»ÊèÊÂèÂÚ»©èÊÂè ÂèÂèÂÚ»ÊèÊÂèÂìÂèÂèÂÚ»hdK§mHnHu[pic]#hF0$h`»5?CJ0OJ[35]QJ[36]^J[37]aJ0 hF0$h` Bruto iekšzemes enerģijas patēriņš atkarībā no degvielas, ES 25, 2000. cietais kurināmais: 18,5% nafta: 38,4% dabasgāze: 22,6% kodolenerģija : 14,4 % atjaunojama enerģija:5,8% cita: 0,3% citas: 2,2% atjaunojamā enerģija: 13,8% kodolenerģija:31,5% dabasgāze: 17% nafta : 6,1% cietais kurināmais: 30,4% Elektrības ražošana atkarībā no degvielas, ES 25, 2000.