This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C:2017:364:FULL
Official Journal of the European Union, C 364, 27 October 2017
Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea, C 364, 27 de octubre de 2017
Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea, C 364, 27 de octubre de 2017
|
ISSN 1977-0928 |
||
|
Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea |
C 364 |
|
|
||
|
Edición en lengua española |
Comunicaciones e informaciones |
60.° año |
|
Número de información |
Sumario |
Página |
|
|
II Comunicaciones |
|
|
|
COMUNICACIONES PROCEDENTES DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA |
|
|
|
Comisión Europea |
|
|
2017/C 364/01 |
No oposición a una concentración notificada (Asunto M.8650 — LGP/CPA) ( 1 ) |
|
|
IV Información |
|
|
|
INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA |
|
|
|
Comisión Europea |
|
|
2017/C 364/02 |
||
|
2017/C 364/03 |
||
|
|
Autoridad para los partidos políticos europeos y las fundaciones políticas europeas |
|
|
2017/C 364/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Texto pertinente a efectos del EEE. |
|
ES |
|
II Comunicaciones
COMUNICACIONES PROCEDENTES DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA
Comisión Europea
|
27.10.2017 |
ES |
Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea |
C 364/1 |
No oposición a una concentración notificada
(Asunto M.8650 — LGP/CPA)
(Texto pertinente a efectos del EEE)
(2017/C 364/01)
El 20 de octubre de 2017, la Comisión decidió no oponerse a la concentración notificada que se cita en el encabezamiento y declararla compatible con el mercado interior. Esta decisión se basa en el artículo 6, apartado 1, letra b), del Reglamento (CE) n.o 139/2004 del Consejo (1). El texto íntegro de la decisión solo está disponible en inglés y se hará público una vez que se elimine cualquier secreto comercial que pueda contener. Estará disponible:
|
— |
en la sección de concentraciones del sitio web de competencia de la Comisión (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). Este sitio web permite localizar las decisiones sobre concentraciones mediante criterios de búsqueda tales como el nombre de la empresa, el número de asunto, la fecha o el sector de actividad, |
|
— |
en formato electrónico en el sitio web EUR-Lex (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=es) con el número de documento 32017M8650. EUR-Lex da acceso al Derecho de la Unión en línea. |
(1) DO L 24 de 29.1.2004, p. 1.
IV Información
INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA
Comisión Europea
|
27.10.2017 |
ES |
Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea |
C 364/2 |
Tipo de cambio del euro (1)
26 de octubre de 2017
(2017/C 364/02)
1 euro =
|
|
Moneda |
Tipo de cambio |
|
USD |
dólar estadounidense |
1,1753 |
|
JPY |
yen japonés |
133,75 |
|
DKK |
corona danesa |
7,4432 |
|
GBP |
libra esterlina |
0,89010 |
|
SEK |
corona sueca |
9,7218 |
|
CHF |
franco suizo |
1,1678 |
|
ISK |
corona islandesa |
|
|
NOK |
corona noruega |
9,4865 |
|
BGN |
leva búlgara |
1,9558 |
|
CZK |
corona checa |
25,589 |
|
HUF |
forinto húngaro |
310,32 |
|
PLN |
esloti polaco |
4,2350 |
|
RON |
leu rumano |
4,5983 |
|
TRY |
lira turca |
4,4338 |
|
AUD |
dólar australiano |
1,5248 |
|
CAD |
dólar canadiense |
1,5041 |
|
HKD |
dólar de Hong Kong |
9,1701 |
|
NZD |
dólar neozelandés |
1,7118 |
|
SGD |
dólar de Singapur |
1,6010 |
|
KRW |
won de Corea del Sur |
1 320,41 |
|
ZAR |
rand sudafricano |
16,7390 |
|
CNY |
yuan renminbi |
7,8003 |
|
HRK |
kuna croata |
7,5155 |
|
IDR |
rupia indonesia |
15 981,73 |
|
MYR |
ringit malayo |
4,9762 |
|
PHP |
peso filipino |
60,939 |
|
RUB |
rublo ruso |
67,7597 |
|
THB |
bat tailandés |
38,973 |
|
BRL |
real brasileño |
3,8030 |
|
MXN |
peso mexicano |
22,3684 |
|
INR |
rupia india |
76,2300 |
(1) Fuente: tipo de cambio de referencia publicado por el Banco Central Europeo.
|
27.10.2017 |
ES |
Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea |
C 364/3 |
DECISIÓN DE LA COMISIÓN
de 23 de octubre de 2017
por la que se cursa una notificación a la República Socialista de Vietnam sobre la posibilidad de que se la identifique como tercer país no cooperante en la lucha contra la pesca ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada
(2017/C 364/03)
LA COMISIÓN EUROPEA,
Visto el Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea,
Visto el Reglamento (CE) n.o 1005/2008 del Consejo, de 29 de septiembre de 2008, por el que se establece un sistema comunitario para prevenir, desalentar y eliminar la pesca ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada, se modifican los Reglamentos (CEE) n.o 2847/93, (CE) n.o 1936/2001 y (CE) n.o 601/2004, y se derogan los Reglamentos (CE) n.o 1093/94 y (CE) n.o 1447/1999 (1), y en particular su artículo 32,
Considerando lo siguiente:
1. INTRODUCCIÓN
|
(1) |
El Reglamento (CE) n.o 1005/2008 («Reglamento INDNR») establece un sistema de la Unión para prevenir, desalentar y eliminar la pesca ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada («pesca INDNR»). |
|
(2) |
El capítulo VI del Reglamento INDNR establece el procedimiento que ha de seguirse para la identificación de los terceros países no cooperantes, las gestiones ante dichos países, el establecimiento de una lista de dichos países, la supresión de un Estado de dicha lista, la publicidad que se le ha de dar a dicha lista y las medidas de urgencia. |
|
(3) |
Conforme al artículo 31 del Reglamento INDNR, la Comisión debe identificar a los terceros países que considere que no cooperan en la lucha contra la pesca INDNR. Un tercer país debe considerarse no cooperante si no cumple la obligación de adoptar medidas para prevenir, desalentar y eliminar la pesca INDNR que le incumbe, en virtud del Derecho internacional, en su calidad de Estado de abanderamiento, Estado rector del puerto, Estado ribereño o Estado de comercialización. |
|
(4) |
Antes de identificar los terceros países no cooperantes en virtud del artículo 31 del Reglamento INDNR, la Comisión debe cursar a los terceros países una notificación sobre la posibilidad de que se los identifique como terceros países no cooperantes, de conformidad con el artículo 32 de dicho Reglamento. Dicha notificación tiene carácter preliminar. La notificación debe basarse en los criterios establecidos en el artículo 31 del Reglamento INDNR. La Comisión también debe tener en cuenta todas las gestiones que se exponen en el artículo 32 de dicho Reglamento con respecto a los terceros países a los que se ha cursado la notificación. En particular, la Comisión debe incluir en la notificación información relativa a los principales hechos y consideraciones que la sustentan y ofrecer a tales países la posibilidad de responder y presentar pruebas en contrario o, en su caso, un plan de actuación para mejorar la situación y las medidas adoptadas para corregirla. La Comisión debe dar a los terceros países destinatarios de una notificación un tiempo adecuado para responder a ella y un plazo razonable para poner remedio a la situación. |
|
(5) |
La identificación de terceros países no cooperantes en virtud del artículo 31 del Reglamento INDNR debe basarse en un análisis de toda la información a la que se hace referencia en el artículo 31, apartado 2, de dicho Reglamento. |
|
(6) |
De conformidad con el artículo 33 del Reglamento INDNR, el Consejo debe elaborar una lista de terceros países no cooperantes. Las medidas recogidas, inter alia, en el artículo 38 del Reglamento INDNR son aplicables a tales países. |
|
(7) |
Conforme al artículo 20, apartado 1, del Reglamento INDNR, la aceptación de los certificados de captura validados por los terceros países que son Estados de abanderamiento está supeditada a que la Comisión haya recibido del Estado de abanderamiento de que se trate una notificación en la que certifique que cuenta con un régimen de aplicación, control y observancia de las leyes, reglamentos y medidas de conservación y ordenación que deben cumplir los buques de su flota pesquera. |
|
(8) |
Con arreglo al artículo 20, apartado 4, del Reglamento INDNR, la Comisión debe cooperar administrativamente con los terceros países en ámbitos relacionados con la aplicación de las disposiciones de dicho Reglamento en materia de certificación de captura. |
2. PROCEDIMIENTO RELATIVO A LA REPÚBLICA SOCIALISTA DE VIETNAM
|
(9) |
La Comisión recibió la notificación de la República Socialista de Vietnam (en lo sucesivo «Vietnam») como Estado de abanderamiento, con arreglo al artículo 20 del Reglamento INDNR, el 27 de octubre de 2009. |
|
(10) |
A raíz de esta notificación, la Comisión inició un proceso de cooperación administrativa con las autoridades de Vietnam conforme a lo dispuesto en el artículo 20, apartado 4, del Reglamento INDNR. Esta cooperación abarcaba cuestiones relativas al régimen nacional de verificación de los certificados de captura y a la aplicación, el control y la observancia de las leyes, los reglamentos y las medidas de conservación y ordenación que deben cumplir los buques pesqueros de Vietnam. Ha supuesto un intercambio de observaciones orales y escritas, así como cuatro visitas a Vietnam entre el 17 y el 21 de septiembre de 2012, entre el 26 y el 30 de noviembre de 2012, entre el 21 y el 24 de junio de 2016 y entre el 15 y el 19 de mayo de 2017, en las que la Comisión recabó y verificó toda la información que consideró necesaria en relación con las medidas adoptadas por Vietnam para cumplir sus obligaciones en la lucha contra la pesca INDNR. |
|
(11) |
Vietnam es cooperante no parte de la Comisión de Pesca del Pacífico Occidental y Central (CPPOC). Vietnam ha ratificado la Convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Derecho del Mar (CNUDM) de 1982. (2) |
|
(12) |
Con el fin de evaluar el cumplimiento por parte de Vietnam de sus obligaciones internacionales en calidad de Estado de abanderamiento, Estado rector del puerto, Estado ribereño o Estado de comercialización recogidas en los acuerdos internacionales mencionados en el considerando (11) e impuestas por las Organizaciones Regionales de Ordenación Pesquera (OROP) pertinentes, la Comisión recabó, recopiló y analizó toda la información necesaria para llevar a cabo tal ejercicio. |
3. POSIBILIDAD DE QUE SE IDENTIFIQUE A VIETNAM COMO TERCER PAÍS NO COOPERANTE
|
(13) |
Conforme al artículo 31, apartado 3, del Reglamento INDNR, la Comisión ha analizado las obligaciones de Vietnam como Estado de abanderamiento, Estado rector del puerto, Estado ribereño o Estado de comercialización. A efectos de ese análisis, la Comisión tomó en consideración los criterios recogidos en el artículo 31, apartados 4 a 7, del Reglamento INDNR. |
3.1. Medidas adoptadas con respecto a la pesca INDNR recurrente y los flujos comerciales de productos derivados de la pesca INDNR (artículo 31, apartado 4, del Reglamento INDNR)
|
(14) |
De conformidad con el artículo 31, apartado 4, letra a), la Comisión analizó las medidas adoptadas por Vietnam con respecto a la pesca INDNR recurrente llevada a cabo o apoyada por buques que enarbolan su pabellón o ciudadanos de ese país, o por buques pesqueros que faenan en su aguas marítimas o utilizan sus puertos. |
|
(15) |
Sobre la base de la información obtenida de las confirmaciones escritas por parte de los terceros Estados ribereños implicados, la Comisión determinó que, durante el período de 2015 a 2017, al menos ocho buques con pabellón de Vietnam cometieron graves infracciones de pesca INDNR dentro de la zona económica exclusiva de los países vecinos y las aguas archipelágicas de pequeños Estados insulares en desarrollo de la zona del Pacífico Central y Occidental. |
|
(16) |
De acuerdo con las pruebas obtenidas, se considera que esos barcos con pabellón vietnamita han cometido las infracciones graves detalladas a continuación, que van en contra de las medidas de conservación y ordenación instauradas por los Estados ribereños correspondientes dentro de las zonas de pesca en aguas que están bajo su jurisdicción nacional. Los buques con pabellón vietnamita han pescado sin contar con una licencia, autorización o permiso válido expedido por el Estado de abanderamiento y el Estado ribereño pertinente, y han obstaculizado el trabajo de los funcionarios del Estado ribereño en el ejercicio de sus funciones de control del cumplimiento de las medidas de conservación y ordenación aplicables, incluso en lo que se refiere a las especies que son objeto de una prohibición de recolección completa, como la de cohombros de mar y peces de arrecife. Si bien los Estados ribereños correspondientes comunicaron a su debido tiempo las actividades ilegales llevadas a cabo por buques vietnamitas a las autoridades de Vietnam, estas no prestaron ninguna ayuda para enjuiciar los casos y tratar con los ciudadanos vietnamitas detenidos. Durante la visita del 15 al 19 de mayo de 2017 se presentaron a las autoridades vietnamitas todas las pruebas obtenidas. |
|
(17) |
El valor medioambiental de las especies objetivo y la protección especial prevista por las medidas de conservación y ordenación de los Estados ribereños mediante prohibiciones de recolección de estas especies son indicios adicionales de la gravedad de las infracciones cometidas. |
|
(18) |
La falta de cumplimiento de los requisitos legales de los Estados ribereños para hacer cumplir los períodos de moratoria en los que se prohíbe pescar cohombros de mar resulta especialmente dañina para la sostenibilidad de los recursos pesqueros en los Estados ribereños en desarrollo afectados y es perjudicial para el sustento de las poblaciones locales. |
|
(19) |
La Comisión consideró que deben tenerse en cuenta las pautas de comportamiento de estos buques de pabellón vietnamita para determinar la gravedad de los hechos. A este respecto, la constante falta de cooperación por parte de los buques vietnamitas ha intensificado la gravedad de las infracciones cometidas. |
|
(20) |
Sobre la base de la información obtenida, la Comisión llegó a la conclusión de que Vietnam ha incumplido las obligaciones que le incumben como Estado de abanderamiento de evitar que su flota participe en actividades de pesca INDNR en alta mar o en aguas de terceros países. Esto no se ajusta a lo dispuesto en el artículo 94, apartados 1 y 2, de la CNUDM, que establece que todo Estado debe ejercer de forma efectiva su jurisdicción y control sobre los buques que enarbolan su pabellón. Tampoco es conforme con el punto 24 del Plan de acción internacional para prevenir, desalentar y eliminar la pesca ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada (PAI-INDNR) (3) de la Organización para la Agricultura y la Alimentación de las Naciones Unidas (FAO), que establece la obligación de llevar a cabo un control completo y eficaz de la pesca. El comportamiento de los ciudadanos vietnamitas responsables de las operaciones de dicha flota también infringe el artículo 62, apartado 4, de la CNUDM, que establece que los nacionales de otros Estados que pesquen en la zona económica exclusiva observarán las medidas de conservación y las demás modalidades y condiciones establecidas en las leyes y reglamentos del Estado ribereño. Por otra parte, la manifiesta falta de cooperación de Vietnam con las autoridades de los Estados ribereños afectados redujo su capacidad de adoptar medidas coercitivas eficaces. |
|
(21) |
De conformidad con el artículo 31, apartado 4, letra b), del Reglamento INDNR, la Comisión examinó las medidas adoptadas por Vietnam por lo que se refiere al acceso de productos de la pesca INDNR a su mercado. |
|
(22) |
Por las razones descritas a continuación, y en la sección 3.2, el marco jurídico de Vietnam en materia de ordenación de la pesca, que se basa especialmente en la Ley de pesca de 2003 y el Decreto n.o 103/2013/ND-CP, relativo a las sanciones administrativas en la actividad pesquera, no parece que establezca medidas para controlar eficazmente los desembarques en los puertos vietnamitas de pescado y productos pesqueros procedentes de buques pesqueros con pabellón de Vietnam y de buques de terceros países. |
|
(23) |
La Comisión analizó la documentación y el resto de la información relativa a los procedimientos de seguimiento y control aplicables al pescado y los productos pesqueros derivados de la actividad de buques pesqueros con pabellón de Vietnam, y al pescado y los productos pesqueros importados en Vietnam. A raíz de esta evaluación, la Comisión considera que Vietnam no puede garantizar que el pescado y los productos pesqueros que entran en sus mercados y plantas de transformación a través de sus puertos nacionales no procedan de la pesca INDNR. Las autoridades vietnamitas no pudieron demostrar que disponen de toda la información necesaria para certificar la legalidad de las importaciones y de los productos transformados con destino a la Unión y su mercado. |
|
(24) |
El 13 de enero de 2016, un envío de 179 toneladas de merluza austral fue desembarcado en el puerto vietnamita de Haiphong desde el buque Asian Warrior. Dicho buque, también conocido como Kunlun y Taishan, figura desde 2013 en la lista de buques INDNR de la Comisión para la Conservación de los Recursos Vivos Marinos Antárticos (CCRVMA) y, desde el 13 de enero de 2015, es objeto de una notificación morada de Interpol. Según la información facilitada por las autoridades vietnamitas, las capturas fueron confiscadas y comercializadas. |
|
(25) |
Sobre la base de la información obtenida por la Comisión en junio de 2017, un operador económico intentó comercializar en la Unión Europea un lote de 320 toneladas de merluza austral almacenadas en Vietnam. Sobre la base de la información disponible, no existen indicios de que los productos en cuestión hubiesen sido capturados en las subzonas 88.1 y 88.2 de la zona abarcada por la Convención para la Conservación de Recursos Vivos Marinos Antárticos (CCRVMA) tras el cierre de la temporada de pesca de esta especie en estas zonas. |
|
(26) |
Las autoridades vietnamitas no pudieron facilitar información de peso que demuestre que han tomado las medidas necesarias para evitar que entre en su territorio merluza austral procedente de actividades de pesca INDNR. Esto no es acorde con el punto 66 del PAI-INDNR de la FAO, que establece que los Estados deberían adoptar todas las medidas compatibles con el derecho internacional que sean necesarias para impedir que el pescado capturado por embarcaciones cuya práctica de la pesca INDNR haya sido determinada por la organización regional de pesca competente se comercialice o importe en su territorio. |
|
(27) |
Por otra parte, la última visita realizada en mayo de 2017 puso de manifiesto la falta de control por parte de las autoridades pesqueras sobre los desembarques de productos pesqueros destinados a la transformación, comercialización o exportación procedentes de buques con pabellón de Estados terceros. Por tanto, Vietnam no sería capaz de garantizar la trazabilidad de los productos pesqueros y, por lo tanto, no parece tomar en consideración el punto 71 del PAI-INDNR, que aconseja a los Estados que tomen medidas para aumentar la transparencia de sus mercados con el fin de poder determinar la procedencia del pescado o los productos pesqueros. |
|
(28) |
Con vistas a la preparación de la visita de mayo de 2017, la Agencia Europea de Control de la Pesca (AECP) analizó una muestra de certificados de capturas y declaraciones de tratamiento presentados en las fronteras de la Unión y correspondientes a lotes originarios de Vietnam. Tales certificados de captura y declaraciones de transformación fueron validados y aprobados por las autoridades vietnamitas en materia de pesca exclusivamente sobre la base de información facilitada por los operadores, sin verificarla. |
|
(29) |
El análisis de los certificados de captura reveló una serie de incoherencias en lo que respecta al peso, la especie y la descripción de los productos, la fecha de validación y el uso de modelos obsoletos. Por otra parte, las reuniones celebradas con las autoridades competentes durante la visita realizada en mayo de 2017 pusieron de manifiesto que las actividades de los buques pesqueros no se verifican completamente antes de la validación de los certificados de captura. La transformación de productos a raíz de certificados de captura con errores manifiestos demuestra que Vietnam ha incumplido su obligación de cooperar con otros Estados y con organizaciones regionales de ordenación pesquera para adoptar las medidas comerciales apropiadas que sean necesarias para prevenir, desalentar y eliminar la pesca INDNR que se especifica en los puntos 68 y 72 del PAI-INDNR. |
|
(30) |
Respecto a las declaraciones de transformación, el análisis mencionado en el considerando anterior, que fue corroborado por las pruebas reunidas durante la visita realizada en mayo de 2017, puso de manifiesto la falta de control de las importaciones de pescado como materia prima y la falta de factores de conversión para comprobar si el peso transformado declarado por la empresa exportadora es coherente con el peso de la materia prima disponible y el tipo de transformación realizada en el establecimiento de transformación de que se trate. |
|
(31) |
La información descrita en la presente sección demuestra que los productos pesqueros transformados o comercializados a través de Vietnam no cumplen las normas sobre prácticas poscaptura sostenibles tal como se describen en el artículo 11 del Código de Conducta de la FAO. Además, Vietnam no ha impuesto normas destinadas a garantizar una cooperación adecuada con terceros países que son Estados de abanderamiento, con respecto al pescado y los productos pesqueros procedentes de su actividad pesquera, que sean acordes con las medidas, previstas en los puntos 67 a 69 y 71 a 72 del PAN-INDNR, que garantizan la transparencia y la trazabilidad, a través del mercado, de los productos pesqueros importados. |
|
(32) |
Teniendo en cuenta las consideraciones expuestas en la presente sección y atendiendo a toda la información factual obtenida por la Comisión y a todas las declaraciones efectuadas por las autoridades competentes de Vietnam, se ha podido determinar, con arreglo al artículo 31, apartado 3, y apartado 4, letras a) y b), del Reglamento INDNR, que Vietnam incumple las obligaciones contraídas en virtud del Derecho internacional en calidad de Estado de abanderamiento, Estado rector del puerto, Estado ribereño y Estado de comercialización en relación con los buques INDNR y con la pesca INDNR llevada a cabo o apoyada por buques pesqueros que enarbolan su pabellón o por sus ciudadanos, así como la obligación de impedir el acceso de productos pesqueros procedentes de la pesca INDNR a su mercado. |
3.2. Falta de cooperación y de medidas coercitivas (artículo 31, apartado 5, del Reglamento INDNR)
|
(33) |
De conformidad con el artículo 31, apartado 5, letra a), del Reglamento INDNR, la Comisión analizó su colaboración con Vietnam para comprobar si este país había cooperado eficazmente contestando a sus solicitudes de información e investigando cuestiones relacionadas con la pesca INDNR y actividades conexas. |
|
(34) |
Si bien las autoridades vietnamitas han cooperado en general a la hora de responder y comunicar con respecto a las solicitudes de información, la fiabilidad y corrección de sus respuestas se han visto socavadas por el obsoleto marco jurídico, que parece no estar en consonancia con sus obligaciones en virtud del Derecho internacional, y por las deficiencias en los sistemas de seguimiento, control y vigilancia descritas en los considerandos 42 y 43. |
|
(35) |
La Ley de pesca de 2003 no obliga a los buques pesqueros ni a informar sobre sus capturas mediante los cuadernos diarios de pesca, ni a presentar una declaración de desembarque. A este respecto, Vietnam no ha cumplido las obligaciones que le incumben, como Estado ribereño, de garantizar la utilización óptima de los recursos pesqueros de su zona económica exclusiva con arreglo a los factores científicos, medioambientales y económicos exigidos en los artículos 61 y 62 de la CNUDM. |
|
(36) |
La Ley de pesca de 2003 tampoco aborda la actividad pesquera llevada a cabo por los buques y los nacionales de Vietnam en alta mar ni en aguas de terceros países. Este resquicio legal en el ámbito de aplicación de la Ley de pesca sobre la actividad pesquera más allá de la zona económica exclusiva de Vietnam socava la capacidad de las autoridades competentes para impedir las actividades de pesca INDNR en dichas zonas. |
|
(37) |
El marco jurídico vietnamita solo prevé medidas de conservación y ordenación limitadas en las aguas territoriales. Las disposiciones jurídicas nacionales y los sistemas de control establecidos para garantizar el cumplimiento de las medidas de conservación y ordenación no parecen ser suficientes, lo cual infringe el artículo 61, apartado 2, de la CNUDM, que establece que los Estados ribereños garantizarán, mediante medidas adecuadas de conservación y administración, que la preservación de los recursos vivos de su zona económica exclusiva no se vea amenazada por un exceso de explotación. |
|
(38) |
De conformidad con el artículo 31, apartado 5, letra b), la Comisión analizó las medidas coercitivas vigentes para prevenir, desalentar y eliminar la pesca INDNR en Vietnam. |
|
(39) |
El actual sistema de sanciones está fijado por el Decreto n.o 103/2013/ND-CP, sobre las sanciones administrativas relacionadas con las actividades pesqueras. No obstante, las definiciones de las actividades de pesca INDNR y las infracciones graves que figuran en la Ley de pesca y en dicho Decreto no se ajustan al Derecho internacional. Por tanto, es evidente que el nivel de las sanciones previstas en el marco jurídico no garantiza el carácter disuasorio del régimen de sanciones ni es acorde con el punto 21 del PAI-INDNR, que insta a los Estados a velar por que el rigor de las sanciones impuestas a la pesca INDNR por embarcaciones y, en la mayor medida posible, por ciudadanos bajo su jurisdicción, sea suficiente para privar a los infractores de los beneficios derivados de este tipo de pesca. |
|
(40) |
Tras su visita de junio de 2016, la Comisión destacó estas cuestiones e invitó a las autoridades vietnamitas a que cooperaran con la Comisión al respecto. Por último, las autoridades vietnamitas presentaron en abril de 2017 el proyecto de una nueva Ley de pesca, con la que, de todas formas, Vietnam seguiría sin cumplir sus obligaciones internacionales. |
|
(41) |
De conformidad con el artículo 31, apartado 5, letra c), la Comisión analizó el alcance y la gravedad de las actividades de pesca INDNR llevadas a cabo por buques que enarbolan el pabellón de Vietnam o por buques pesqueros que faenan en aguas marítimas o puertos vietnamitas. |
|
(42) |
Las visitas realizadas por la Comisión revelaron que Vietnam no dispone de los medios necesarios para garantizar un control adecuado de los buques que enarbolan su pabellón, incluida la garantía de que no se lleven a cabo actividades de pesca en alta mar ni en aguas de terceros países. Mientras que Vietnam no autoriza a sus buques a faenar en alta mar y en aguas de terceros países, existen pruebas de que, como se detalla en los considerandos 14 a 19, buques vietnamitas siguen llevando a cabo estas actividades ilegales en aguas de terceros países (4). |
|
(43) |
Según la información facilitada por las autoridades vietnamitas, la flota pesquera vietnamita está formada por 109 000 buques, de los cuales 33 000 faenan en la zona económica exclusiva de Vietnam más allá de las 24 millas marinas a partir de las líneas de base. Las autoridades vietnamitas reconocen que solo el 10 % de los 33 000 buques que faenan más allá de 24 millas náuticas a partir de las líneas de base están equipados con sistema de localización de buques (SLB) y que no existe ninguna obligación legal de activarlos. La última visita al centro de seguimiento de pesca (CSP), en mayo de 2017, también puso de manifiesto que el personal encargado de las tareas de seguimiento, control y vigilancia no estaba familiarizado con las herramientas disponibles y que no se habían corregido las deficiencias de base ya señaladas en la visita anterior, de junio de 2016. Además, durante la visita, según el seguimiento SLB visualizado en las pantallas del CSP, se detectaron dos buques pesqueros vietnamitas fuera de las aguas de Vietnam y el personal del CSP reconoció que no se había adoptado ninguna medida. Unos requisitos inadecuados para los cuadernos diarios de pesca y la falta de un régimen de inspecciones en el puerto y en el mar socavan aún más la capacidad de las autoridades para controlar las actividades marítimas. |
|
(44) |
Los hechos descritos en la presente sección indican que, si bien debe revisarse el actual marco jurídico para garantizar la coherencia entre el Derecho nacional y las normas internacionales, Vietnam ha incumplido su obligación de cooperar eficazmente con la Comisión para ajustar su legislación con los instrumentos jurídicos internacionales pertinentes, lo que da lugar al incumplimiento del artículo 94 de la CNUDM, que exige que Estado de abanderamiento ejerza su jurisdicción de conformidad con su Derecho interno sobre todo buque que enarbole su pabellón, y sobre su capitán, oficiales y tripulación. Parece que Vietnam tampoco ha aplicado las recomendaciones recogidas en el punto 24 del PAI-INDNR, que aconseja a los Estados de abanderamiento que emprendan un seguimiento, control y vigilancia completos y eficaces de la pesca desde la captura y la presentación en el lugar de desembarque, hasta el destino final, incluida la aplicación de un sistema de localización de buques a bordo de los buques pesqueros de conformidad con las normas nacionales, regionales e internacionales pertinentes. |
|
(45) |
Teniendo en cuenta las consideraciones presentadas en la presente sección y atendiendo a toda la información factual obtenida por la Comisión, así como a las declaraciones efectuadas por las autoridades vietnamitas, puede determinarse, con arreglo al artículo 31, apartados 3 y 5, del Reglamento INDNR, que Vietnam ha incumplido las obligaciones que le incumben en virtud del Derecho internacional con respecto a la cooperación y las medidas coercitivas. |
3.3. Falta de aplicación de las normas internacionales (artículo 31, apartado 6, del Reglamento INDNR)
|
(46) |
De conformidad con el artículo 31, apartado 6, letras a) y b), del Reglamento INDNR, la Comisión analizó la ratificación o la adhesión por parte de Vietnam a los instrumentos internacionales pertinentes en materia de pesca y su condición de Parte contratante de organizaciones regionales de ordenación pesquera, o su compromiso de aplicar las medidas de conservación y ordenación adoptadas por tales organizaciones. |
|
(47) |
Vietnam ratificó la CNUDM en 1994 y es cooperante no parte de la CPPOC. |
|
(48) |
Con la excepción de la CNUDM, Vietnam no ha ratificado otros instrumentos jurídicos internacionales relacionados con la ordenación de la pesca. Los resultados que está obteniendo Vietnam en la aplicación de los instrumentos internacionales no se ajustan a las recomendaciones del punto 11 del PAI-INDNR, que insta a los Estados a que, con carácter prioritario, ratifiquen, acepten o se adhieran al Acuerdo de las Naciones Unidas sobre la aplicación de las disposiciones de la CNUDM relativas a la conservación y ordenación de las poblaciones de peces transzonales y las poblaciones de peces altamente migratorios (UNFSA) y al Acuerdo sobre cumplimiento de la FAO. Tampoco cumplen el punto 14 del PAI-INDNR, que establece que los Estados deben aplicar de forma plena y efectiva el Código de Conducta y los planes de acción internacionales conexos. |
|
(49) |
Vietnam no ha ratificado el Acuerdo de la FAO, de 2009, sobre medidas del Estado rector del puerto (MERP), lo cual también significa que, como se detalla en el considerando 27, Vietnam no aplica medidas de control portuario sobre los desembarques de los buques de pesca extranjeros, a pesar de la importancia que tienen el pescado y los productos pesqueros que se importan en el país para abastecer a la industria de transformación. |
|
(50) |
El marco jurídico y las medidas de ejecución vietnamitas también parecen incumplir los requisitos básicos de los artículos 62 y 117 a 119 de la CNUDM, relativos a la utilización óptima de los recursos vivos, al deber de los Estados de adoptar medidas para la conservación de los recursos vivos de la alta mar en relación con sus nacionales, al deber de cooperación mutua en la conservación y administración de los recursos vivos y al deber de conservar los recursos vivos de la alta mar. |
|
(51) |
De conformidad con el artículo 31, apartado 6, letra c), la Comisión analizó si Vietnam puede haber incurrido en algún acto u omisión que pueda haber mermado la eficacia de las leyes, reglamentos o medidas internacionales de conservación y ordenación aplicables. |
|
(52) |
La Comisión observa que la comisión anual de la CCRVMA señaló a Vietnam como parte no contratante posiblemente activa en la captura, el desembarque o el comercio de merluza austral, aunque no cooperante con el sistema de documentación de capturas (SDC) establecido en 2000 para llevar un seguimiento de estas especies desde el punto de desembarque a lo largo de todo el ciclo comercial. |
|
(53) |
Teniendo en cuenta las consideraciones presentadas en la presente sección y atendiendo a toda la información factual obtenida por la Comisión, así como a las declaraciones efectuadas por Vietnam, se pudo determinar, con arreglo al artículo 31, apartados 3 y 6, del Reglamento INDNR, que Vietnam ha incumplido las obligaciones que le incumben en virtud del Derecho internacional en relación con las normas, reglamentos y medidas de conservación y ordenación internacionales. |
3.4. Limitaciones específicas de los países en desarrollo (artículo 31, apartado 7, del Reglamento INDNR)
|
(54) |
Con arreglo al Índice de Desarrollo Humano de las Naciones Unidas (IDHNU) (5), Vietnam era considerado en 2015 un país con un índice de desarrollo humano medio (con el puesto 115 dentro de una lista de 188 países). |
|
(55) |
A la vista de la posición en la clasificación IDHNU a la que se ha hecho referencia y de las observaciones formuladas durante las visitas de 2012 a 2017, no hay indicios de que el incumplimiento por parte de Vietnam de sus obligaciones en virtud del Derecho internacional sea resultado de un bajo nivel de desarrollo. No hay pruebas concretas que vinculen las deficiencias en el marco jurídico y los sistemas de seguimiento, control y vigilancia de la pesca con carencias en materia de capacidad e infraestructuras. La Comisión ha respondido afirmativamente a la solicitud, presentada por Vietnam en mayo de 2017, de ayuda en la revisión del marco jurídico relativo a la pesca. |
|
(56) |
Teniendo en cuenta la situación descrita en la presente sección y atendiendo a toda la información factual obtenida por la Comisión, así como a las declaraciones efectuadas por el país, se pudo determinar, con arreglo al artículo 31, apartado 7, del Reglamento INDNR, que el estado de desarrollo en materia de pesca y el comportamiento general de Vietnam en relación con la gestión de la pesca no se ven obstaculizados por el nivel de desarrollo del país. |
4. CONCLUSIÓN SOBRE LA POSIBLE IDENTIFICACIÓN COMO TERCER PAÍS NO COOPERANTE
|
(57) |
Vistas las conclusiones expuestas en relación con el incumplimiento por parte de Vietnam de las obligaciones que le incumben en virtud del Derecho internacional como Estado de abanderamiento, Estado rector del puerto, Estado ribereño o Estado de comercialización, así como con su falta de actuación para impedir, desalentar y eliminar la pesca INDNR, debe notificarse a dicho país, con arreglo al artículo 32 del Reglamento INDNR, la posibilidad de ser considerado por la Comisión tercer país no cooperante en la lucha contra la pesca INDNR. |
|
(58) |
La Comisión también debe iniciar respecto de Vietnam todas las gestiones recogidas en el artículo 32 del Reglamento INDNR. En aras de una buena administración, debe fijarse un plazo para que este país pueda responder por escrito a la notificación y corregir la situación. |
|
(59) |
Asimismo, cabe señalar que la notificación a Vietnam de la posibilidad de ser considerado por la Comisión tercer país no cooperante a efectos de la presente Decisión ni excluye ni conlleva de forma automática que la Comisión o el Consejo adopten subsiguientemente cualquier otra medida a los efectos de la identificación y la elaboración de una lista de terceros países no cooperantes. |
DECIDE:
Artículo único
Debe cursarse a Vietnam la notificación de la posibilidad de que la Comisión lo identifique como tercer país no cooperante en la lucha contra la pesca ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada.
Hecho en Bruselas, el 23 de octubre de 2017.
Por la Comisión
Karmenu VELLA
Miembro de la Comisión
(1) DO L 286 de 29.10.2008, p. 1.
(2) https://treaties.un.org/
(3) Plan de acción internacional para prevenir, desalentar y eliminar la pesca ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada, Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación, 2001.
(4) Las actividades ilegales de los llamados «barcos azules» vietnamitas han recibido una amplia cobertura de los medios de comunicación de la región del Pacífico:
https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2016/03/29/australia-captures-vietnamese-vessels-suspected-of-iuu/
http://nationalpost.com/news/world/tiny-island-nation-of-palau-very-publicly-burns-vietnamese-boats-caught-fishing-illegally
http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/mmea-detains-vietnamese-fishermen-for-illegal-fishing#UEtd7edz4ez9lRch.97
https://www.solomonstarnews.com/news/national/12655-blue-boats-seized
http://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/malaysia-detains-another-40-vietnamese-for-illegal-fishing-3616922.html
(5) Información procedente de: http://hdr.undp.org/es/data
Autoridad para los partidos políticos europeos y las fundaciones políticas europeas
|
27.10.2017 |
ES EN |
Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea |
C 364/10 |
Decisión de la Autoridad para los partidos políticos europeos y las fundaciones políticas europeas
de 20 de julio de 2017
por la que se registra al Partido Verde Europeo
(El texto en lengua inglesa es el único auténtico)
(2017/C 364/04)
LA AUTORIDAD PARA LOS PARTIDOS POLÍTICOS EUROPEOS Y LAS FUNDACIONES POLÍTICAS EUROPEAS,
Visto el Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea,
Visto el Reglamento (UE, Euratom) n.o 1141/2014 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 22 de octubre de 2014, sobre el estatuto y la financiación de los partidos políticos europeos y las fundaciones políticas europeas (1), y en particular su artículo 9,
Vista la solicitud presentada por el Partido Verde Europeo,
Considerando lo siguiente:
|
(1) |
El 7 de junio de 2017, la Autoridad para los partidos políticos europeos y las fundaciones políticas europeas («Autoridad») recibió del Partido Verde Europeo («solicitante») una solicitud de registro como partido político europeo en virtud del artículo 8, apartado 1, del Reglamento (UE, Euratom) n.o 1141/2014, solicitud respecto de la cual se presentó información complementaria el 13 de junio de 2017, el 11 de julio de 2017, el 13 de julio de 2017 y el 18 de julio de 2017. |
|
(2) |
El solicitante presentó documentación que certifica que reúne los requisitos establecidos en el artículo 3 del Reglamento (UE, Euratom) n.o 1141/2014, la declaración según el formulario que figura en el anexo de dicho Reglamento, y sus estatutos, que contienen las disposiciones previstas en el artículo 4 del mencionado Reglamento. |
|
(3) |
En apoyo de la solicitud también se presentó una declaración del notario Anton Van Bael, con arreglo al artículo 15, apartado 2, del Reglamento (UE, Euratom) n.o 1141/2014, por la que se certifica que el solicitante tiene su sede en Bélgica y que sus estatutos son conformes con las disposiciones pertinentes del Derecho nacional. |
|
(4) |
El solicitante presentó otros documentos con arreglo a los artículos 1 y 2 del Reglamento Delegado (UE, Euratom) 2015/2401 de la Comisión (2). |
|
(5) |
De conformidad con el artículo 9 del Reglamento (UE, Euratom) n.o 1141/2014, la Autoridad ha examinado la solicitud y la documentación que la acompaña, y considera que el solicitante cumple los requisitos de registro que establece el artículo 3 de dicho Reglamento, y que los estatutos incluyen las disposiciones previstas en el artículo 4 del mencionado Reglamento. |
HA ADOPTADO LA PRESENTE DECISIÓN:
Artículo 1
Mediante la presente Decisión se registra al Partido Verde Europeo como partido político europeo.
Adquirirá personalidad jurídica en la fecha de publicación de la presente Decisión en el Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea.
Artículo 2
La presente Decisión surtirá efecto el día de su notificación.
Artículo 3
El destinatario de la presente Decisión es:
|
Partido Verde Europeo |
|
Rue Wiertz/Wiertzstraat 31 |
|
1050 Bruxelles/Brussels |
|
BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
Hecho en Bruselas, el 20 de julio de 2017.
Por la Autoridad para los partidos políticos europeos y las fundaciones políticas europeas
El Director
M. ADAM
(1) DO L 317 de 4.11.2014, p. 1.
(2) Reglamento Delegado (UE, Euratom) 2015/2401 de la Comisión, de 2 de octubre de 2015, sobre el contenido y el funcionamiento del Registro de los partidos políticos europeos y las fundaciones políticas europeas (DO L 333 de 19.12.2015, p. 50).
ANEXO
STATUTES
of the
EUROPEAN GREEN PARTY
European Political Party (PPEU)
adopted at the EGP Council, 12.11.2011, Paris
amended at the EGP Council, 20-22 May 2016, Utrecht
amended at the EGP Council, 2-4 December 2016, Glasgow
amended at the EGP Council, 31 March 2017, Liverpool
Preamble
The European Green Party represents Green Parties from all over Europe, and we are part of the Global Green family. We stand proudly for sustainable development and respect of human rights, built on the values of environmental responsibility, equality, freedom, justice, diversity and peace. Greens face the challenges of the 21st century by seeking to shape society in an innovative way. We propose policies for social solidarity and coherence compatible with sound economic and financial governance and which guarantee sustainability within our changing societies. For us and for generations to come.
These Statutes replace and supersede the previous Statutes of the European Green Party published in the Moniteur Belge on 19/09/2013 .
Article 1
Definitions
|
1.1. |
‘Full Members’ means those members specified in Article 4.3.1. |
|
1.2. |
‘Members’ means the entire membership of the European Green Party as specified in Article 4. |
|
1.3. |
‘Allocated Votes’ means the total number of votes assigned at each Council meeting to Full Members, determined according to their size and other criteria under a formula detailed in the Rule Book, and to the Green Group in the European Parliament and the Federation of Young European Greens as specified in Article 5.3 and further detailed in the Rule Book. |
|
1.4. |
‘Rule Book’ means the detailed rules for the functioning, management and operations of the European Green Party and the composition of its bodies adopted in accordance with these Statutes. |
|
1.5. |
‘Europe’ means the territory within the outer borders set by the Council of Europe. |
|
1.6. |
‘Parties’ means political parties registered or recognised as such in their home country. |
Article 2
Name, Logo and Seat
|
2.1. |
Through the present statutes the Full Members set up a European Political Party (Parti Politique Européen, PPEU), governed by the dispositions of Title III and IIIter of the Belgian law of 27 June 1921 on non-profit associations, foundations and European political parties and foundations. |
|
2.2. |
The Full Members form the European Political Party ‘European Green Party’, also called ‘the European Greens’. The name may be abbreviated as necessary to ‘EGP’. |
|
2.3. |
The logo of the European Green Party is a green rectangle with a stylized sunflower — consisting of twelve yellow petals – slightly tilted to the right, and with the words ‘European Green Party’ in white letters (font: Jaldi) positioned on the right of it.
Alternatively, the words ‘European Greens’ can be used. For official documents, the logo with ‘European Green Party’ will be used.
|
|
2.4. |
The seat of the European Green Party is situated at rue Wiertz 31, in 1050 Brussels, Belgium. |
|
2.5. |
The Committee may move the seat anywhere in Belgium by simple majority vote. The move must be published in the Moniteur Belge in accordance with the Belgian law. |
|
2.6. |
The European Green Party, acting through the Committee, shall keep detailed financial accounts and shall report at least once a year to the Full Members on the state of the finances. The financial year of the organisation shall be from 1st January to 31st December. |
Article 3
Aims and Objectives
The European Green Party
|
3.1. |
is a European political party within the terms of EU Regulation (EC) No 1141/2014 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding, |
|
3.2. |
takes as its principles the Charter of the European Greens (further described as the Green Charter) annexed hereto (Annex A), |
|
3.3. |
is open to political parties and other groups with a green agenda, from within and outside the European Union, which can subscribe to the Green Charter and which fulfil the membership criteria as laid down in these Statutes and further elaborated in the Rule Book, |
|
3.4. |
stimulates and organises initiatives and activities on a European level in order to accomplish a common green political agenda and, to ensure close and permanent cooperation among all its Members, contributes to forming European awareness and seeks to express the political will of the citizens of the European Union as well as to realise the full potential of green political representation at all political levels, |
|
3.5. |
works in close cooperation with the Green Group in the European Parliament (GGEP), the Green European Foundation (GEF), and the Federation of Young European Greens (FYEG), |
|
3.6. |
acts as the European partner within the structure of the Global Greens movement and subscribes to the Global Greens Charter annexed hereto (Annex C). |
|
3.7. |
applies the principle of gender-balance in all its elected and appointed bodies and external representation. |
Article 4
Membership
|
4.1. |
The European Green Party consists of Green parties and is open to green organisations and movements. |
|
4.2. |
Parties from within Europe can be accepted as Full or Candidate Members. Associate Members may be from outside these borders. |
|
4.3. |
There are four membership categories:
|
|
4.4. |
The admission of Members and any subsequent suspension or withdrawal of Membership shall be decided by the Council and requires in each case a three-quarters majority of the Allocated Votes.
|
|
4.5. |
Rights and Duties of the Members
|
Article 5
Relations with the Green Group in the European Parliament (‘GGEP’), the Federation of Young European Greens (‘FYEG’), the Green European Foundation (‘GEF’) and the Global Greens (‘GG’)
|
5.1. |
The European Green Party is exclusively represented in the European Parliament by the GGEP or its successors and the GGEP in turn represents the special category (MEP) members within the EGP. |
|
5.2. |
The European Green Party has as its youth organisation the Federation of Young European Greens (FYEG). |
|
5.3. |
Both the GGEP and the FYEG are entitled to appoint delegates to meetings of the European Green Party, including Council meetings, and to vote thereat. |
|
5.4. |
GEF is the affiliated political foundation of the EGP.
|
|
5.5. |
The European Green Party acts as the European partner within the structure of the Global Greens, which encompasses Green parties and associates at a global level. |
Article 6
Structure and Bodies of the European Green Party
|
6.1. |
The bodies of the European Green Party are:
|
|
6.3. |
Council
|
|
6.4. |
Congress
|
|
6.5. |
Committee
|
Article 7
The Finance Advisory Board (FAB)
|
7.1. |
The Council shall elect a Finance Advisory Board of 3 persons to work with the Treasurer and the Committee to supervise the financial management of the European Green Party, including its accountability and financial transparency and to give advice to the Council and the Committee of the European Green Party as well as to its Members on these matters. The Board shall also report to Council annually on whether the European Green Party has acted in accordance with the Statutes and Rule Book. |
|
7.2. |
The composition of and regulations for the Finance Advisory Board are further defined in the Rule Book. |
Article 8
The Conciliation Panel
|
8.1. |
The Council shall elect a Conciliation Panel consisting of a minimum of 5 persons to assist in settling disputes between Members, persons and/or bodies of the EGP on issues relating to the interpretation of these Statutes or the Rule Book or other operational matters. The Panel shall report to Council with recommendations and Council shall determine the appropriate course of action. All persons and bodies of the European Green Party shall be bound by the outcome of this process. |
|
8.2. |
The composition of and regulations for the Conciliation Panel are further defined in the Rule Book. |
Article 9
Accounts and Budget
|
9.1. |
Annually, the Treasurer shall prepare the annual accounts and the budget; and present these to the Committee and the Finance Advisory Board in order to finalize them. The finalized annual accounts and budget will be submitted to the Council for approval. In this respect, the Council will hear the Finance Advisory Board. The annual accounts are audited by an auditor that is mandated by the European Parliament. The audit report will be communicated to the subsequent Council. |
|
9.2. |
The bookkeeping is conducted in accordance with the international accounting standards defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002. |
Article 10
Donation Policy
|
10.1. |
The EGP will publish a list annually, specifying both donor and donation, for all donations exceeding 1 000 EUR per donor or per online donation, except during election campaigns to the European Parliament or for donations exceeding 3 500 EUR, where publication will take place immediately on the EGP website. |
|
10.2. |
European Green Party does not accept:
|
|
10.3. |
Any donation that is not permitted under Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations will, within 30 days following the date it is received by the European political party or the European political foundation:
|
Article 11
Privacy and Protection of Personal Data
|
11.1. |
The European Green Party processes personal data of supporters and participants on the basis of their consent under the Directive 1995/46/EC as well as the Belgian Privacy Act of 8 December 1992. Personal data is securely stored and not shared or disclosed to third parties without the consent of the data subject, unless this is necessary for the compliance with a legal obligation. The name and function of donors who donate over 1 000 EUR per year and of participants of the EGP Council meetings will be published. Data subjects have in particular the right to access their data and to request erasure or rectification. |
Article 12
Legal liability and representation
|
12.1. |
The Committee is legally liable for actions of the European Green Party within the limits of the laws of the country where the official seat of the European Green Party is situated in accordance with Article 2 hereof. |
|
12.2. |
Contracts on behalf of the European Green Party normally require a single signature of a Co-Chair, the Secretary-General or the Treasurer. |
|
12.3. |
The persons specified in Article 9.2 hereof may represent the European Green Party and defend its interests in court and act as its legal representatives in any jurisdiction. |
|
12.4. |
The European Green Party may appoint a special proxy holder, and is legally bound by acts of such person within the limits of their power of attorney. |
Article 13
Liquidation
|
13.1. |
Upon a proposal to the Council by the Committee or by a minimum of one third of the Full Members, the Council may decide upon the dissolution and liquidation of the European Green Party provided the proper proceedings have been complied with. The decision by the Council to liquidate the European Green Party must be made by a three-quarters majority of the Allocated Votes. |
|
13.2. |
As from the moment the decision of dissolution is taken, the European Green Party is required to mention at all times that it is ‘in dissolution’. |
|
13.3. |
Upon dissolution, the Council shall decide on (i) the appointment, the powers and the remuneration of the liquidator(s), (ii) the methods and procedures of the liquidation. All such decisions have to be duly filed at the clerk’s office of the competent Commercial Court and published in the Annexes to the Moniteur Belge in line with the applicable legislation. |
|
13.4. |
In the event that European legislation provides for a different legal status for political parties and the Council of the European Green Party decides to adopt such a status, the financial and other assets of the European Green Party shall be transferred to the new legal entity. |
|
13.5. |
In the event of the final liquidation of the European Green Party, after the settlement of contractual obligations to staff and other obligations, the remaining financial and other assets shall be transferred to the Green European Foundation. |
Article 14
Additional Provisions and changes to the Statutes
|
14.1. |
The Council shall adopt a Rule Book containing detailed rules for the functioning, management and operations of the European Green Party and the composition of its bodies in accordance with these Statutes. |
|
14.2. |
Changes to these Statutes may only be made by Council voting with a three-quarters majority of the Allocated Votes. Changes to the Rule Book may only be made by Council voting with a two-thirds majority of the Allocated Votes with the exception of the Articles 6.5 and 6.6, which require a three-quarters majority of the Allocated Votes. |
|
14.3. |
All changes to the present Statutes must be formalised in accordance with the provisions of Title III of the Belgian law of 27 June 1921 on non-profit associations, foundations and European political parties and foundations. |
|
14.4. |
Any omissions to the present Statutes are covered by the law of 27 June 1921 governing non-profit associations, foundations and European political parties and foundations. |
|
14.5. |
Matters related to the application of the present Statutes shall be determined by the courts of Brussels or by arbitration and the laws of Belgium shall apply. |
|
14.6. |
In the event of divergence or of doubt between these statutes in French and the original version in English, the English language version prevails. |
Annex A
The Charter of the European Greens
European Green Party Guiding Principles
Adopted at 2nd EGP Congress, Geneva, 13-14 October 2006
Who we are
The European Greens proudly stand for the sustainable development of humanity on planet Earth, a mode of development respectful of human rights and built upon the values of environmental responsibility, freedom, justice, diversity and non-violence.
Green political movements emerged in Europe while the continent was divided by the Cold War and amidst the energy crises of the mid-seventies. At that time, it became clear that the pattern of economic development was unsustainable and was putting the planet and its inhabitants in grave environmental, social and economic dangers. Existing political parties were incapable of dealing with this challenge.
Our origins lie in many social movement: environmentalists and anti-nuclear activists concerned with the growing damages to our planet; non-violent peace activists promoting alternative ways to resolve conflicts; feminists, struggling for real equality between women and men; freedom and human rights movements fighting against dictatorial and authoritarian regimes; third-world solidarity movements supporting the end of colonization and more economically balanced relations between the North and the South of our planet; activists campaigning against poverty and for social justice within our own societies.
From these origins, European Greens have come together to form our own political family. We stand for a free, democratic and social Europe in a peaceful, equitable and environmentally sustainable world. We defend values like justice, human and citizen's rights, solidarity, sustainability and the right of each individual to lead their own lives, free from fear.
From the beginning, Greens have advocated thinking globally and acting locally. To develop cooperation at European level, a coordination body was founded in 1984, transforming itself in 1993 into the European Federation of Green Parties. In 2004, underlining the objective of a deeper cooperation, the Federation was transformed again into the European Green Party. European Greens are part of a thriving global Green movement.
Guiding principles
The guiding principles which provide the framework to the political actions by the member parties of the European Green Party can be defined as follows:
I. Environmental Responsibility
Taking responsibility for our biosphere is a central tenet of Green values. Society depends on the ecological resources and the health and resilience of the planet, and we bear an over-riding obligation to future generations to protect this inheritance.
We advocate strongly the need to live within our ecological means. We must maintain biological diversity and combat global warming through sustainable use of renewable resources and the careful husbandry of non-renewable resources. The responsible use of bio-diversity is of critical importance for meeting the food, health and other needs of the growing world population. But beyond any notion of utility, Greens believe that each of the diverse species of life on our planet has an intrinsic value and beauty and therefore deserves to be protected.
Our European pattern of production, consumption and commerce are contributing to the continued poverty of the majority of the planet's inhabitants and causing severe environmental degradation and climatic instability. Industrialised and industrialising countries can no longer postpone action to respond to these challenges. The urgent need to change these patterns necessarily means a profound adjustment process if we are to reverse this damaging exploitation of our common home.
The political challenge facing us is the task to restructure the global agenda so that economic and trade policies serve social and environmental objectives and not just economic indices. Our answer is sustainable development, which integrates environmental, social and economic objectives for the benefit of all. Sustainable development can only be achieved through global cooperation to overcome the economic contradictions between the developing countries, the emerging economies and the industrialised world. Every citizen of the world has the same right to a fair share of the world's resources and also bears the same obligation to ensure that future generations can enjoy the same benefits.
Greens always seek to apply the precautionary principle. We will not support measures which present potential threats to human health or environmental well-being. But neither will we accept delay in implementation of new precautionary measures solely on the ground that scientific studies are not sufficiently numerous. Whatever the domain, - peace, energy, food and agriculture, life sciences, transport, technology, medicine, –decisions and action must systematically follow the least harmful option.
Specifically as regards nuclear energy, Greens stand for a nuclear-free Europe, because of the civil and military threats it poses, because of the burden it puts onto the future generations and because of the security apparatus it needs. For Greens, the priority is to develop decentralized and renewable alternative energies.
II. Freedom through Self-Determination:
Individual autonomy
We Greens believe all human beings — regardless of sex, age, sexual orientation or identity, ethnic origin or disability- have the right to make their own choices, to express themselves freely and to shape their own lives. This freedom is not exclusively about material possessions; it includes the social, cultural, intellectual and spiritual dimensions of human life.
These inalienable rights should be guaranteed by law and taught in schools as basic foundations of our societies. They should be fulfilled by empowerment of the people, by the opportunity for all women and men to make a living for themselves and their families and, where necessary, by social and material support, sufficient to lead a dignified life and to fully participate in society. Where these rights are lacking, we Greens will fight for them, proposing solidarity, education, development cooperation and protection from violence, oppression, and discrimination.
Inclusive democracy
Our belief in democracy is founded upon the mutual recognition of all individuals as equals. To encourage a maximum level of commitment, the political and decision-making processes have to be democratic, inclusive, transparent and fully accessible in a way comprehensible to ordinary citizens. The radical changes needed for sustainable development require that all take a common responsibility and a fair share of the burden. Elected representatives have the duty to consult and fully inform their constituents throughout the whole decision making process.
We must always think globally, even whilst acting locally. To ensure the highest level of citizens' involvement and benefit, the authority to decide should be vested in the lowest effective level. Conversely, whenever a problem requires action on a higher level, the consequences for the lower levels should be taken into account and differences respected. Minority interests must be given adequate attention and protection.
We are committed to strengthening democracy throughout Europe, at local, regional, national and supra-national levels. We want to strengthen the democratic responsibility and accountability of multi-lateral institutions.
III. Extending Justice:
Green policies are based on the principle of justice. This demands a fair distribution of society's goods and this, in turn, requires special attention to the needs of the weakest. Attention to the weakest is especially of importance at the global level, where Europe has a specific responsibility to stimulate economic growth in the developing countries. Because we have to address the problems of a changing world, our notion of justice goes far beyond traditional redistribution policies. Greens stand for social justice, for gender equity, for justice between generations, and for justice at the global level. Despite the practical conflicts arising between them, these dimensions of justice must not be played off against each other.
Social justice ensures that everyone has access to vital societal resources: education, work and democratic participation. Fair access must be defended in the face of existing social imbalances, and needs to be institutionally safeguarded. Education is a decisive factor in the ability to shape one's own life. Using our labour skills enables us to bear the fruits of our abilities and thus defines a key part of our identity. Democratic participation is a basic requirement for becoming involved in society and helping to shape it.
Gender equity. Justice is also gender equity. Women and men should enjoy the same power to define how society will develop. Moreover, they should be able to live their lives free from violence. We Greens want to develop the institutional framework which guarantees women equality at home, at work, in public office and in other positions of influence. We want to facilitate the harmonisation of family and professional life for both genders.
Justice between the generations. The motto ‘We have only borrowed the world from our children’ is more appropriate today than ever before. Today, our children's future is at risk. Justice between generations means an obligation for the older generation to hand down our environmental, social and cultural heritage to the younger ones in a sustainable way. It also includes an obligation for the younger generations to care for the elder population. It should be ensured that all generations can participate fully in society.
Global justice. Justice is also our yardstick on the international level. As the global economy connects people and increases our interdependence, this moral obligation also becomes a practical imperative. Worldwide sustainable development and universal human rights are at the core of our concept of global justice. These must be underpinned by an independent institutional monitoring framework for corporate social responsibility and fair trade.
Justice requires solidarity, non-discrimination and citizens' involvement. Solidarity helps create self-confident individuals — it strengthens citizens instead of patronising them. All public authorities should work in partnership with citizens to create and defend institutions that enhance solidarity. For this reason we also want to invest in networks and communities, which, with state encouragement, practice mutual support.
IV. Diversity, an Indispensable Condition
The richness of civilisations, societies, and cultures has developed through diversification. We Greens are ourselves the result of the merging of a host of social movements, and we believe diversity is a condition for success, survival even, in almost every field of activity. Diversity increases the resilience of organisations and groups whenever they are confronted with unexpected changes. It is a safeguard against intolerance, extremism and totalitarianism. And it is an indispensable source of inspiration and renewal.
Human diversity has many dimensions: gender, social, cultural, spiritual, philosophical, religious, linguistic, economic, ethnic, sexual, regional. These may be expressed by individuals or by social groups. We cherish this diversity. It should however never be used as a pretext for questioning universal rights.
Where people share the same limited space, differences may easily be perceived as threats. Even in the smallest community, the strong tend to make use of their dominant role whereas the weak often find themselves pushed to conform. Safeguarding diversity therefore requires recognition, mutual understanding and respect – and, only too often, active protection.
V. Non-Violence
Non-violence forms a key part of the philosophical background of Green theories and conditions our approach to all problems. No lasting solution to any conflict between individuals, social groups or States can be imposed by force. A basic green principle is that the means used to achieve an objective must be compatible with the objective itself. So the political search for justice and peace cannot be achieved by violent means.
Violence is not just physical. Human actions and global economic structures can deprive people of their human rights and exacerbate social injustice. Poverty is perhaps the most insidious form of violence. To eliminate poverty, we promote international bodies that aim at economic equity and put people's livelihoods and security first, as well as binding global rules for the protection of human rights.
Insofar as armed conflicts are concerned, we are convinced that the use of army or police forces as an isolated strategy cannot be successful in the long run. Greens want to see less military intervention and the implementation of the concept of a civil foreign and security policy. This requires the development of powerful tools for conflict prevention and civil conflict management.
Nevertheless Greens recognise that military means may be called upon by the international community as a last resort. Where there is a threat of mass violence against civilians, deployment of peace-keeping military forces may be justified as a deterrent. When preventative measures have failed, armed intervention may be necessary. Recourse to military means will be subject to the rule of international law and is only legitimate if the following conditions are met:
|
— |
the existence of an explicit mandate of the UN Security Council; |
|
— |
the agreement to the primary objective of intervening in order to save and protect lives through preventing violence; |
|
— |
the existence of a political strategy defining how such military intervention should end and a peaceful and stable situation be established. |
VI. To sum it up, Sustainable Development
Greens recognize that the values of environmental responsibility, freedom, justice, diversity and non-violence can be – and are to some extent – shared by other political families. What defines Greens is that we consider these values as interdependent and inseparable. As a whole, they determine all our actions directed towards the sustainable social, cultural, environmental and economic development of our societies on planet Earth. We apply them not only to our external policies but to our own political conduct as well as to the organisation of our own party.
Europeans were the pioneers of the process of industrialization which is at the heart of some of our worst global problems. As citizens of one of the wealthiest continents on Earth, we Europeans carry a major responsibility for the reversal of the destructive trends it has generated and for initiating an alternative and sustainable development model. The scope of the issues at stake is such that it is beyond the powers of any single state to achieve this aim. Therefore we need cooperation in which all of Europe — from Dublin to Tbilisi, from Helsinki to Lisbon, from Ankara to Reykjavik — will be able to participate.
The European Union is well placed to facilitate this cooperation, providing that:
|
a) |
it remains open for further enlargements; |
|
b) |
it restructures itself into a truly democratic institution, |
|
c) |
it reorients its priorities towards an environmentally and socially sustainable model of development and |
|
d) |
it assumes its global responsibilities, under the United Nations, and in cooperation with other valuable institutions such as the OSCE and the Council of Europe, for a peaceful and sustainable world. |
Annex B
Membership List
List of the Full Members of the EGP – 31 March 2017
|
Country |
Party |
Status |
|
Albania |
Partia e Gjelber |
Full Member since 2008 |
|
Andorra |
Verds D’Andorra |
Full Member since 2010 |
|
Austria |
Die Grünen |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Belgium |
Ecolo |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Belgium |
Groen |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Bulgaria |
Zelena Partija Bulgaria |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Bulgaria |
Zelenite |
Full Member since 2013 |
|
Cyprus |
Cyprus Green Party |
Full Member since 1998 |
|
Czech Republic |
Strana Zelenych |
Full Member since 1997 |
|
Denmark |
Socialistisk Folkeparti/SF |
Full Member since 2014 |
|
Estonia |
Eestimaa Rohelised |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Finland |
Vihreät — De Gröna |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
France |
Europe Ecologie — Les Verts/EELV |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Georgia |
Sakartvelo’s mtsvaneta partia |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Germany |
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Greece |
Oicologoi-Prasinoi/Ecologist Greens |
Full Member since 1994 |
|
Hungary |
Lehet Más a Politika/LMP |
Full Member since 2011 |
|
Ireland |
Comhaontas Glas |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Italy |
Federazione dei Verdi |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Latvia |
Latvijas Zala Partija/LZP |
Full Member since 2001 |
|
Luxembourg |
déi gréng |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Malta |
Alternattiva Demokratika – the Green Party |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Moldova |
Partidul Verde Ecologist |
Full Member since 2008 |
|
Netherlands |
De Groenen |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Netherlands |
GroenLinks |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Norway |
Miljøpartiet De Grønne |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Poland |
Zieloni |
Full Member since 2005 |
|
Portugal |
Partido Ecologista – Os Verdes |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Romania |
Partidul Verde |
Full Member since 1999 |
|
Slovenia |
Stranka mladih — Zeleni Evrope/SMS-Zeleni |
Full Member since 2006 |
|
Spain |
Iniciativa per Catalunya Verds/ICV |
Full Member since 2006 |
|
Spain |
EQUO |
Full Member since 2016 |
|
Sweden |
Miljöpartiet de gröna |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Switzerland |
Grüne/Les Verts/I Verdi |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
Ukraine |
Partija Zelenykh Ukrainy/PZU |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
United Kingdom |
Green Party of England and Wales |
Full Member since 1993 |
|
United Kingdom |
Scottish Green Party |
Full Member since 1994 |
List of Associate Members – 31 March 2017
|
Country |
Party |
Status |
|
Azerbaijan |
Azerbaycan Yaşıllar Partiyası |
Associate member since November 2012 |
|
Belarus |
Bielaruskaja Partyja ‘Zialonye’ |
Associate member since May 2013 |
|
Russia |
Зеленая Россия/Green Russia |
Associate member since May 2013 |
|
Russia |
GROZA |
Associate Member since December 2016 |
List of Candidate Members – 31 March 2017
|
Country |
Party |
Status |
|
Croatia |
ORaH |
Candidate member since November 2014 |
|
Macedonia |
Democratic Renewal of Macedonia (DOM) |
Candidate member since November 2015 |
|
Turkey |
Yeşiller ve Sol Gelecek Partisi |
Candidate member since November 2012 |
List of Special Members – 31 March 2017
|
AUT |
– |
Die Grünen, AUSTRIA (3) Ulrike LUNACEK (indirect) Michel REIMON (indirect) Monika VANA (indirect) |
|
BEL |
– |
Groen and ECOLO, BELGIUM (2) Philippe LAMBERTS, ECOLO (indirect) Bart STAES, Groen (indirect) |
|
DEU |
– |
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, GERMANY (11) Jan Philipp ALBRECHT (indirect) Reinhard BÜTIKOFER (indirect) Michael CRAMER (indirect) Sven GIEGOLD (indirect) Rebecca HARMS (indirect) Martin HÄUSLING (indirect) Maria HEUBUCH (indirect) Barbara LOCHBIHLER (indirect) Ska KELLER (indirect) Terry REINTKE (indirect) Helga TRÜPEL (indirect) |
|
DNK |
– |
SF – DENMARK (1) Margrete AUKEN (indirect) |
|
ESP |
– |
Iniciativa Catalunya-Verds and EQUO — SPAIN (2) Ernest URTASUN, Iniciativa Catalunya Verds (indirect) Florent MARCELLESI, EQUO (indirect) |
|
FIN |
– |
Vihreät – De Gröna — FINLAND (1) Heidi HAUTALA (indirect) |
|
FRA |
– |
Europe Ecologie — Les Verts (EELV) - FRANCE (6) José BOVÉ (indirect) Karima DELLI (indirect) Pascal DURAND (indirect) Yannick JADOT (indirect) Eva JOLY (indirect) Michèle RIVASI (indirect) |
|
GBR |
– |
The Green Party, England and Wales — UNITED KINGDOM (3) Jean LAMBERT (indirect) Molly SCOTT CATO (indirect) Keith TAYLOR (indirect) |
|
HRV |
– |
Independent – CROATIA (1) Davor ŠKRLEC (direct) |
|
HUN |
– |
Lehet Más a Politika and Párbeszéd Magyarországért – HUNGARY (2) Tamas MESZERICS, Lehet Más a Politika (indirect) Benedek JÁVOR, Párbeszéd Magyarországért (direct) |
|
ITA |
– |
Independent – ITALY (1) Marco AFFRONTE (direct) |
|
LTU |
– |
Lietuvos valstiečių ir žaliųjų sąjunga – LITHUANIA (1) Bronis ROPE (direct) |
|
LUX |
– |
Déi gréng — LUXEMBOURG (1) Claude TURMES (indirect) |
|
NLD |
– |
GroenLinks – NETHERLANDS (2) Bas EICKHOUT (indirect) Judith SARGENTINI (indirect) |
|
SVN |
– |
Party Verjamem – SLOVENIA (1) Igor ŠOLTES (direct) |
|
SWE |
– |
Miljöpartiet de gröna — SWEDEN (4) Max ANDERSSON (indirect) Bodil VALERO (indirect) Linnéa ENGSTRÖM (indirect) Jakop DALUNDE (indirect) |
Annex C
Charter of the global Greens
As adopted in Canberra 2001 and updated in Dakar 2012
The Global Greens is the international network of Green parties and political movements
Contents
| Preamble | 34 |
| Principles | 36 |
| Ecological Wisdom | 36 |
| Social Justice | 36 |
| Participatory Democracy | 36 |
| Nonviolence | 37 |
| Sustainability | 37 |
| Respect for Diversity | 38 |
| Political Action | 38 |
|
1. |
Democracy | 38 |
|
2. |
Equity | 39 |
|
3. |
Climate change and energy | 40 |
|
4. |
Biodiversity | 40 |
|
5. |
Governing economic globalisation by sustainability principles | 41 |
|
6. |
Human rights | 42 |
|
7. |
Food and water | 43 |
|
8. |
Sustainable planning | 44 |
|
9. |
Peace and security | 45 |
|
10. |
Acting globally | 45 |
Preamble
We, as citizens of the planet and members of the Global Greens,
United in our awareness that we depend on the Earth's vitality, diversity and beauty, and that it is our responsibility to pass them on, undiminished or even improved, to the next generation
Recognising that the dominant patterns of human production and consumption, based on the dogma of economic growth at any cost and the excessive and wasteful use of natural resources without considering Earth's carrying capacity, are causing extreme deterioration in the environment and a massive extinction of species
Acknowledging that injustice, racism, poverty, ignorance, corruption, crime and violence, armed conflict and the search for maximum short term profit are causing widespread human suffering
Accepting that developed countries through their pursuit of economic and political goals have contributed to the degradation of the environment and of human dignity
Understanding that many of the world's peoples and nations have been impoverished by the long centuries of colonisation and exploitation, creating an ecological debt owed by the rich nations to those that have been impoverished
Committed to closing the gap between rich and poor and building a citizenship based on equal rights for all individuals in all spheres of social, economic, political and cultural life
Recognising that without equality between men and women, no real democracy can be achieved
Concerned for the dignity of humanity and the value of cultural heritage
Recognising the rights of indigenous people and their contribution to the common heritage, as well as the right of all minorities and oppressed peoples to their culture, religion, economic and cultural life
Convinced that cooperation rather than competition is a pre-requisite for ensuring the guarantee of such human rights as nutritious food, comfortable shelter, health, education, fair labour, free speech, clean air, potable water and an unspoilt natural environment
Recognising that the environment ignores borders between countries
and
Building on the Declaration of the Global Gathering of Greens at Rio in 1992
Assert the need for fundamental changes in people's attitudes, values, and ways of producing and living
Declare that the new millennium provides a defining point to begin that transformation
Resolve to promote a comprehensive concept of sustainability which
|
— |
protects and restores the integrity of the Earth's ecosystems, with special concern for biodiversity and the natural processes that sustain life |
|
— |
acknowledges the interrelatedness of all ecological, social and economic processes |
|
— |
balances individual interests with the common good |
|
— |
harmonises freedom with responsibility |
|
— |
welcomes diversity within unity |
|
— |
reconciles short term objectives with long term goals |
|
— |
ensures that future generations have the same right as the present generation to natural and cultural benefits |
Affirm our responsibility to one another, to the greater community of life, and to future generations
Commit ourselves as Green parties and political movements from around the world to implement these interrelated principles and to create a global partnership in support of their fulfillment
Principles
The policies of the Global Greens are founded upon the principles of
Ecological Wisdom
We acknowledge that human beings are part of the natural world and we respect the specific values of all forms of life, including non-human species.
We acknowledge the wisdom of the indigenous peoples of the world, as custodians of the land and its resources.
We acknowledge that human society depends on the ecological resources of the planet, and must ensure the integrity of ecosystems and preserve biodiversity and the resilience of life supporting systems.
This requires
|
— |
that we learn to live within the ecological and resource limits of the planet |
|
— |
that we protect animal and plant life, and life itself that is sustained by the natural elements: earth, water, air and sun |
|
— |
where knowledge is limited, that we take the path of caution, in order to secure the continued abundance of the resources of the planet for present and future generations. |
Social Justice
We assert that the key to social justice is the equitable distribution of social and natural resources, both locally and globally, to meet basic human needs unconditionally, and to ensure that all citizens have full opportunities for personal and social development.
We declare that there is no social justice without environmental justice, and no environmental justice without social justice.
This requires
|
— |
a just organization of the world and a stable world economy which will close the widening gap between rich and poor, both within and between countries; balance the flow of resources from South to North; and lift the burden of debt on poor countries which prevents their development. |
|
— |
the eradication of poverty, as an ethical, social, economic, and ecological imperative |
|
— |
the elimination of illiteracy |
|
— |
a new vision of citizenship built on equal rights for all individuals regardless of gender, race, age, religion, class, ethnic or national origin, sexual orientation, disability, wealth or health |
Participatory Democracy
We strive for a democracy in which all citizens have the right to express their views, and are able to directly participate in the environmental, economic, social and political decisions which affect their lives; so that power and responsibility are concentrated in local and regional communities, and devolved only where essential to higher tiers of governance.
This requires
|
— |
individual empowerment through access to all the relevant information required for any decision, and access to education to enable all to participate |
|
— |
breaking down inequalities of wealth and power that inhibit participation |
|
— |
building grassroots institutions that enable decisions to be made directly at the appropriate level by those affected, based on systems which encourage civic vitality, voluntary action and community responsibility |
|
— |
strong support for giving young people a voice through educating, encouraging and assisting youth involvement in every aspect of political life including their participation in all decision making bodies. |
|
— |
that all elected representatives are committed to the principles of transparency, truthfulness, and accountability in governance. |
|
— |
that all electoral systems are transparent and democratic, and that this is enforced by law |
|
— |
that in all electoral systems, each adult has an equal vote |
|
— |
that all electoral systems are based on proportional representation, and all elections are publicly funded with strict limits on, and full transparency of, corporate and private donations. |
|
— |
that all citizens have the right to be a member of the political party of their choice within a multi-party system |
Nonviolence
We declare our commitment to nonviolence and strive for a culture of peace and cooperation between states, inside societies and between individuals, as the basis of global security.
We believe that security should not rest mainly on military strength but on cooperation, sound economic and social development, environmental safety, and respect for human rights.
This requires
|
— |
a comprehensive concept of global security, which gives priority to social, economic, ecological, psychological and cultural aspects of conflict, instead of a concept based primarily on military balances of power |
|
— |
a global security system capable of the prevention, management and resolution of conflicts |
|
— |
removing the causes of war by understanding and respecting other cultures, eradicating racism, promoting freedom and democracy, and ending global poverty |
|
— |
pursuing general and complete disarmament including international agreements to ensure a complete and definitive ban of nuclear, biological and chemical arms, anti-personnel mines and depleted uranium weapons |
|
— |
strengthening the United Nations (UN) as the global organisation of conflict management and peacekeeping |
|
— |
pursuing a rigorous code of conduct on arms exports to countries where human rights are being violated. |
Sustainability
We recognise the limited scope for the material expansion of human society within the biosphere, and the need to maintain biodiversity through sustainable use of renewable resources and responsible use of non-renewable resources.
We believe that to achieve sustainability, and in order to provide for the needs of present and future generations within the finite resources of the earth, continuing growth in global consumption, population and material inequity must be halted and reversed.
We recognise that sustainability will not be possible as long as poverty persists.
This requires
|
— |
ensuring that the rich limit their consumption to allow the poor their fair share of the earth's resources |
|
— |
redefining the concept of wealth, to focus on quality of life rather than capacity for over-consumption |
|
— |
creating a world economy which aims to satisfy the needs of all, not the greed of a few; and enables those presently living to meet their own needs, without jeopardising the ability of future generations to meet theirs |
|
— |
eliminating the causes of population growth by ensuring economic security, and providing access to basic education and health, for all; giving both men and women greater control over their fertility |
|
— |
redefining the roles and responsibilities of trans-national corporations in order to support the principles of sustainable development |
|
— |
implementing mechanisms to tax, as well as regulating, speculative financial flows |
|
— |
ensuring that market prices of goods and services fully incorporate the environmental costs of their production and consumption |
|
— |
achieving greater resource and energy efficiency and development and use of environmentally sustainable technologies |
|
— |
encouraging local self-reliance to the greatest practical extent to create worthwhile, satisfying communities |
|
— |
recognising the key role of youth culture and encouraging an ethic of sustainability within that culture. |
Respect for Diversity
We honour cultural, linguistic, ethnic, sexual, religious and spiritual diversity within the context of individual responsibility toward all beings.
We defend the right of all persons, without discrimination, to an environment supportive of their dignity, bodily health, and spiritual well-being
We promote the building of respectful, positive and responsible relationships across lines of division in the spirit of a multi-cultural society.
This requires
|
— |
recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples to the basic means of their survival, both economic and cultural, including rights to land and to self determination; and acknowledgment of their contribution to the common heritage of national and global culture |
|
— |
recognition of the rights of ethnic minorities to develop their culture, religion and language without discrimination, and to full legal, social and cultural participation in the democratic process |
|
— |
recognition of and respect for sexual minorities |
|
— |
equality between women and men in all spheres of social, economic, political and cultural life |
|
— |
significant involvement of youth culture as a valuable contribution to our Green vision, and recognition that young people have distinct needs and modes of expression. |
Political Action
1. Democracy
|
1.0. |
The majority of the world's people live in countries with undemocratic regimes where corruption is rampant and human rights abuses and press censorship are commonplace. Developed democracies suffer less apparent forms of corruption through media concentration, corporate political funding, systematic exclusion of racial, ethnic, national and religious communities, and electoral systems that discriminate against alternative ideas and new and small parties. |
The Greens -
|
1.1. |
Have as a priority the encouragement and support of grassroots movements and other organisations of civil society working for democratic, transparent and accountable government, at all levels. |
|
1.2. |
Actively support giving young people a voice through educating, encouraging and assisting youth participation in every aspect of political action. |
|
1.3. |
Will strive for the democratisation of gender relations by promoting appropriate mediations to enable women and men equally to take part in the economic, political, social sphere. |
|
1.4. |
Support the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business and urge non-parties to sign and ratify without further delay |
|
1.5. |
Uphold the right of citizens to have access to official information and to free and independent media. |
|
1.6. |
Will work for universal access to electronic communications and information technology, as minimum, through radio, community-based internet and email. We will also work to make access to these technologies as cheap as possible. |
|
1.7. |
Uphold a just secular legal system that ensures the right of defence and practices proportionality between crime and punishment. |
|
1.8. |
Support the public funding of elections, and measures to ensure all donations are fully transparent and accountable and are free from undue influence, whether perceived or otherwise. |
|
1.9. |
Will challenge corporate domination of government, especially where citizens are deprived of their right to political participation. |
|
1.10. |
Support the separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial systems, and the separation of state and religion. |
|
1.11. |
Support the development and strengthening of local government. |
|
1.12. |
Support the restructuring of state institutions to democratise and make them more transparent and efficient in serving the goal of citizens' power and sustainable development. |
|
1.13. |
Support global governance based on the democratic principle of one person — one vote — one value, rather than by unelected corporate interests. |
2. Equity
|
2.0. |
The differences in living standards and opportunities in the world today are intolerable. Third world debt is at an all time high of US$3,7 trillion while Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries give just 0,31 % of GNP in aid. The richest 20 % of the world's population has 83 % of global income while the poorest 20 %, including nearly 50 % of the world's young people, share barely 1 % and 2,6 billion people live on less than US$2 a day. 60 % of the world's poor are women. 130 million children never attend school while 800 million adults can neither read nor write, two-thirds of them women Population growth has slowed but world population is projected to grow from 6,1 billion in 2000 to 8,9 billion in 2050, an increase of 47 %. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) infections remain severe problems. |
The Greens -
|
2.1. |
Will work to increase government aid to developing countries, and support aid funding being directed to the poorest of the poor, with the priorities being determined through working with local communities. |
|
2.2. |
Will work to improve the rights, status, education and political participation of women. |
|
2.3. |
Commit ourselves to the goal of making high quality primary education universal by 2015 financed through increased aid and debt relief. |
|
2.4. |
Will work towards cancellation of developing country debt especially in the poorest countries, and support the use of incentives to ensure that savings from debt relief are channelled into poverty reduction and environment conservation, and that transparent and accountable processes are in place with participation from affected communities. |
|
2.5. |
See concerted action to combat the great pandemics including HIV-Aids, TB and malaria as a priority, especially in Africa, where a twofold effort is needed to allow general access to low cost and efficient therapies, and to restore economic progress, especially through education. |
|
2.6. |
Recognise the right to compensation of those people that lose access to their natural resources through displacement by environmental destruction or human intervention such as colonisation and migration. |
|
2.7. |
Will review the relationship between exclusive ownership of property and exclusive use of its resources, with a view to curbing environmental abuse and extending access for basic livelihood to all, especially indigenous communities. |
|
2.8. |
Will work to ensure that all men, women and children can achieve economic security, without recourse to personally damaging activities such as pornography, prostitution or the sale of organs. |
|
2.9. |
Will commit to work for more equal allocation of welfare and for creation of equal opportunities inside all our societies, recognising that there is a growing number of poor and marginalised people in developed countries also. |
|
2.10. |
Understand that the current form of financialised neo-liberal capitalism aids the rich and is crisis prone. It contributes to growing inequality and dispossession of poor people |
|
2.11. |
Will defend and promote the human, social and environmental rights of people of colour. |
3. Climate change and energy
|
3.0. |
The climate crisis is both greatest challenge facing the global community and the greatest opportunity for humanity to rethink how we live, in a way that is socially just and within the Earth's ecological limits. The Greens are committed to limiting global temperature rise to no more than 1,5 degrees above pre-industrial levels. Global emissions will need to peak well before 2020 to have a chance to stay within this temperature limit. |
The Greens -
|
3.1. |
Adopt the target of limiting CO2 levels in the atmosphere to 450 ppm in the shortest period possible. |
|
3.2. |
Will work to support a rapid transition to zero carbon economies around the world. |
|
3.3. |
Will work to establish an international emissions reporting framework for trans-national corporations, linked to global carbon taxes and global environmental loads. |
|
3.4. |
Will work hard to ensure that developing countries have access to the most efficient, sustainable and appropriate technology, with a strong focus on renewable energy, and that they agree to Climate Change Conventions to ensure that actions are comprehensive and worldwide. The equity principle must be at the core of climate change negotiations and measures. |
|
3.5. |
Oppose any expansion of nuclear power and will work to phase it out rapidly. |
|
3.6. |
Will support a call for a moratorium on new fossil fuel exploration and development |
|
3.7. |
Will work to stop deforestation and degradation of natural forests by 2020, noting that they are the most carbon rich ecosystems on the planet, vital to indigenous people, rich in plants and animals, and irreplaceable in any human time scale. |
|
3.8. |
Promote tree planting of diverse species but not monocultures, as a short-term measure for carbon sequestration, with other benefits for the environment. |
|
3.9. |
Promote the levying of taxes on non-renewable energy and support the use of funds raised to promote energy efficiency and renewable energy. |
|
3.10. |
Support research into the use of sustainable energy sources and the technical development of ecological power production |
|
3.11. |
Promote transfer of energy efficient technologies and green power infrastructure between and within countries and economies on a no-costs or minimal costs basis. This is one of the economic costs of the emissions to date by western countries. |
4. Biodiversity
|
4.0. |
Healthy ecosystems are essential to human life, yet we seem to have forgotten the relationship between nature and society. Extinction rates are 100 to 1000 times higher than in pre-human times. Only 20 % of the Earth's original forests remain relatively undisturbed. 80 % of fish stocks are already depleted or in danger of being overfished. Invasions by non-native plants, animals and diseases are growing rapidly. Habitat destruction and species extinction are driven by industrial and agricultural development that also exacerbates climate change, global inequity and the destruction of indigenous cultures and livelihoods. Agricultural monoculture, promoted by agribusiness and accelerated by genetic modification and patenting of nature, threatens the diversity of crop and domestic animal species, radically increasing vulnerability to disease. |
The Greens -
|
4.1. |
Will vigorously oppose environmentally destructive agricultural and industrial development and give primary effort to protecting native plants and animals in their natural habitat, and wherever possible in large tracts. |
|
4.2. |
Will work to remove subsidies for environmentally destructive activities, including logging, fossil fuel exploitation, dam construction, mining, genetic engineering and agricultural monoculture. |
|
4.3. |
Will promote ecological purchasing policies, for products such as wood, based only on the most rigorous definition of sustainability backed by credible labelling. |
|
4.4. |
Support the concept of ‘debt for nature’ swaps, subject to the agreement of affected indigenous and local communities. |
|
4.5. |
Will promote the repair of degraded natural environments, and the cleanup of toxic sites of former and existing military and industrial zones around the world. |
|
4.6. |
Note that reducing the transport of goods around the world, in line with a preference for local production where possible, will have the added benefit of reducing ‘bio-invasions’, as well as reducing fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. |
|
4.7. |
Commit to promote a global ecology curriculum for all levels of education. |
|
4.8. |
Will work towards establishing an international court of justice specifically for environmental destruction and the loss of biodiversity where cases can be heard against corporations, national, states and individuals. |
|
4.9. |
Will refuse to accept the patenting and merchandising of life. |
5. Governing economic globalisation by sustainability principles
|
5.0. |
Fifty-three of the 100 biggest economies in the world today are corporations. With the collusion of governments, they have created a legal system that puts unfettered economic activity above the public good, protects corporate welfare but attacks social welfare, and makes national economies subservient to a global financial casino that turns over $US3 trillion per day in speculative transactions. The Global Financial Crisis has increased volatility and insecurity in all economies, with the most significant impact on poorer individuals, groups and countries. The IMF and the World Bank have contributed to this crisis rather than been part of the solution; the prerequisites on which they are based are not fit to create a global, sustainable and just economic system. |
The Greens -
|
5.1. |
Affirm that essentials of life, such as water, must remain publicly owned and controlled; and that culture, basic access to food, social and public health, education, and a free media are not ‘commodities’ to be subjected to international market agreements. |
|
5.2. |
Support the creation of a World Environment Organisation by combining the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), and the Global Environment Facility (GEF) into a single institution with funding and power to impose sanctions to promote global sustainable development. The World Trade Organisation (WTO) should be subject to the decisions of this body. |
|
5.3. |
Support serious reform of the World Bank and IMF so that their membership and decision-making are democratic, and their operations subservient to sustainability principles and to all international conventions on human and labour rights, and environmental protection. |
|
5.4. |
Support serious reform of the WTO to make sustainability its central goal, supported by transparent and democratic processes and the participation of representatives from affected communities. In addition there must be separation of powers to remove the disputes settlement mechanism from the exclusive competence of the WTO. A sustainability impact assessment of earlier Negotiation Rounds is required before any new steps are taken. |
|
5.5. |
Will work to prevent the implementation of new regional or hemispheric trade and investment agreements under the WTO rules but support countries' integration processes that assure people's welfare and environmental sustainability. |
|
5.6. |
Will create a world environment where financial and economic institutions and organisations will nurture and protect environmentally sustainable projects that will sustain communities at all levels (local, regional, national and international). |
|
5.7. |
Demand that international agreements on the environment, labour conditions and health should take precedence over any international rules on trade. |
|
5.8. |
Will work to implement a Tobin-Henderson or Financial Transactions Tax and other instruments to curb speculative international currency transactions and help encourage investment in the real economy, and to create funds to promote equity in global development. |
|
5.9. |
Will work to require corporations to abide by the environmental, labour and social laws of their own country and of the country in which they are operating, whichever are the more stringent |
|
5.10. |
Will work to ensure that all global organizations, especially those with significant capacity to define the rules of international trade, firmly adhere to principles of sustainable development and pursue a training program of cultural change to fully realise this goal. |
|
5.11. |
Want corporate welfare made transparent and subject to the same level of accountability as social welfare, with subsidies to environmentally and socially destructive activities phased out altogether. |
|
5.12. |
Endorse the development of civic entrepreneurship to promote a community based economy as a way of combating social exclusion caused by economic globalisation. |
6. Human rights
|
6.0. |
Denial of human rights and freedoms goes hand in hand with poverty and political powerlessness. Millions suffer discrimination, intimidation, arbitrary detention, violence and death. Three-quarters of the world's governments have used torture in the last three years. |
The Greens -
|
6.1. |
Endorse the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Labour Organisation (ILO) conventions, and other international instruments for the protection of rights and freedoms. We believe that these rights are universal and indivisible and that national governments are responsible for upholding them. |
|
6.2. |
Condemn all dictatorships and regimes which deny human rights, regardless of their political claims |
|
6.3. |
Will work with local communities to promote awareness of human rights, and to ensure that the UN Commission for Human Rights and other treaty bodies are adequately resourced. |
|
6.4. |
Call for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to be amended to include rights to a healthy natural environment and intergenerational rights to natural and cultural resources. |
|
6.5. |
Uphold the right of women to make their own decisions, including the control of their fertility by the means they deem appropriate, free from discrimination or coercion; support the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW); urge non-signatories to sign and ratify without further delay; and urge existing signatories to remove all reservations. |
|
6.6. |
Support the right of indigenous peoples to self-determination, land rights, and access to traditional hunting and fishing rights for their own subsistence, using humane and ecologically sustainable techniques; and support moves for indigenous people to set up and work through their own international bodies. |
|
6.7. |
Support the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as the minimum standard of protection accepted by indigenous peoples, and support moves for indigenous people to set up and work through their own international bodies. |
|
6.8. |
Demand that torturers are held accountable, and will campaign for them to be brought to justice, in their own countries or elsewhere, before an international panel of judges serving under the auspices of the International Criminal Court. |
|
6.9. |
Oppose any violation of the physical integrity of the individual by torture, punishment or any other practices including traditional and religious mutilation. |
|
6.10. |
Demand that the death penalty be abolished worldwide. |
|
6.11. |
Call for governments to ensure that all asylum-seekers, whether they are victims of state violence or independent armed groups, are correctly treated in accordance with the 1951 Geneva Convention on the Rights to Asylum; have access to fair processes; are not arbitrarily detained; and are not returned to a country where they might suffer violations of their fundamental human rights, or face the risk of death, torture, or other inhuman treatment. |
|
6.12. |
Call for the prohibition of collective expulsion. |
|
6.13. |
Uphold the right of all workers to safe, fairly remunerated employment, with the freedom to unionise. |
|
6.14. |
Support the right of children to grow up free from the need to work, and the establishment of a lower age limit for working children/adolescents. |
|
6.15. |
Demand decriminalisation of homosexuality, and support the right of gay and lesbian people to their lifestyle, and the equal rights of homosexual relationships. |
|
6.16. |
Will work to improve the opportunities of disabled people to live and work equally in society, including true political participation. |
|
6.17. |
Support the right of linguistic minorities to use their own language. |
7. Food and water
|
7.0. |
Hundreds of millions of people remain undernourished, not because there is insufficient food but because of unequal access to land, water, credit and markets. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are not the solution, because the immediate problem is not production but distribution. Moreover, GMOs pose unacceptable risks to the environment, independent smaller farmers, and consumers, as well as to the biodiversity that is our best insurance against agricultural disaster. Water shortages loom, both in above-ground systems and subterranean aquifers. Deforestation of catchments takes a devastating toll in landslides and floods, while desertification and degradation rapidly are expanding. One bright spot is the rapid growth of organic agriculture. |
The Greens -
|
7.1. |
Consider that access to clean water for basic needs is a fundamental right and oppose the privatisation of water resources and infrastructure. |
|
7.2. |
Will work to eliminate water subsidies, other than social subsidies, and to make water use more efficient. |
|
7.3. |
Will work to ensure that fresh water and underground water resources are conserved in quality and quantity and appropriately priced to ensure these resources are adequately protected from depletion |
|
7.4. |
Consider that the stability of catchments and the health of river systems is paramount, and will work with the people directly affected to stop the degradation of rivers, including new large dams and irrigation projects, and deforestation of catchments. |
|
7.5. |
Will work with local communities in arid and semi-arid regions, where climate is dominated by uncertainty, to reduce land degradation. |
|
7.6. |
Express their concern for countries that have been hard hit by desertification and deforestation, and ask the countries that have not yet done so to ratify the UN Convention of Desertification, and make the necessary resources available to enact this Convention. |
|
7.7. |
Will support and promote organic agriculture. |
|
7.8. |
Call for a worldwide ban on the commercial growing of genetically modified crops. |
|
7.9. |
Will work to ensure that food is safe, with stringent regulations on production, storage and sale. |
|
7.10. |
Will work to ensure that scientific research is conducted ethically and applied in accordance with the precautionary principle. |
|
7.11. |
Call for a phase out of all persistent and bio-accumulative man- made chemicals and to work to eliminate all releases to the environment of hazardous chemicals. |
|
7.12. |
Will work to ensure that animal growth hormones are banned, and stringent regulations governing the use of antibiotics on animals are enforced. |
|
7.13. |
Will work to ensure the humane treatment of all animals during breeding, transport and slaughter and will ensure animal welfare. |
|
7.14. |
Will work towards ensuring the effect of erosion, floods and other environmental hazards are ameliorated and that appropriate adaptation measures are implemented. |
8. Sustainable planning
|
8.0. |
Consumption in industrialised countries is excessive by any measure, and largely responsible for environmental decline. Newly industrialising countries are also increasing their consumption, which will add significantly to the ecological pressure. Changing to a green economy — which mimics ecological processes, eliminates waste by re-using and recycling materials, and emphasises activities that enhance the quality of life and relationships rather than the consumption of goods — brings a promise of new jobs, industries with less pollution, better work environments and a higher quality of life. |
The Greens -
|
8.1. |
Promote measures of well-being rather than GDP to measure progress, and recognise the ecological limits to material growth and consumption. |
|
8.2. |
Consider that citizens of countries affected by a development project have the right to participate in decisions about it, regardless of national boundaries. |
|
8.3. |
Will work to ensure that those who profit from exploiting any common and/or natural resources should pay the full market rent for the use of these resources, and for any damage they do to any other common resources. |
|
8.4. |
Recognise that the impact of continuing urban growth (sprawl) onto agricultural land and the natural environment must be limited and ultimately stopped |
|
8.5. |
Recognise that the process of urbanisation due to rural poverty must be slowed and reversed through appropriate rural development programs which protect the character and ecology of the rural landscape. |
|
8.6. |
Support local planning for ecologically sustainable business, housing, transport, waste management, parks, city forests, public spaces; and will establish links between Greens at local and regional level around the planet to exchange information and support. |
|
8.7. |
Will work to reduce vehicle based urban pollution by opposing ever-expanding freeways; encouraging the use of energy efficient vehicles; integrating land use planning with public transport, bicycling and walking; prioritising mass transit planning and funding over private auto infrastructure; and eliminating tax policies that favour auto-centric development. |
|
8.8. |
Will work to create socially responsible economic strategies, using taxes and public finance to maximise incentives for fair distribution of wealth, and eco-taxes to provide incentives to avoid waste and pollution. |
|
8.9. |
Demand that corporations and communities reduce, reuse and recycle waste, aiming for a zero waste economy which replicates a natural ecosystem. |
|
8.10. |
Will support all policies that allow countries to increase job creation through economic activities that add value, or through recycling of resources, the production of durable goods, organic agriculture, renewable energy and environmental protection. |
|
8.11. |
Promote socially responsible investment and ecological marketing so that consumers can make positive choices based on reliable information. |
|
8.12. |
Recognise the value of traditional and local knowledge and beliefs, and support its incorporation into planning and projects. |
9. Peace and security
|
9.0. |
We understand peace as being more than the absence of war. To strive for peace has always been at the core of the Green agenda. The causes of conflict are changing. The impacts of climate change, competition for water, food and resources will become increasingly significant. The distinctions between war, organised crime and deliberate large-scale abuses of human rights are becoming progressively blurred. Since 2001 the war on ‘terror’ has also led to the erosion of human rights in the name of security. The arms trade is growing and globalising, nourished by a unique exemption from WTO rules against subsidies. As a global network, we have a vital role to play in strengthening the links between community organisations working for human rights and peace, and supporting and shaping the emerging concepts and institutions of global governance. |
The Greens -
|
9.1. |
Support strengthening the role of the UN as a global organisation of conflict management and peacekeeping, while, noting that, where prevention fails and in situations of structural and massive violations of human rights and/or genocide, the use of force may be justified if it is the only means of preventing further human rights violations and suffering, provided that it is used under a mandate from the UN. Nonetheless, individual countries have the right not to support or to cooperate with the action. |
|
9.2. |
Will campaign for greater power for countries of the South in the UN, by working to abolish the veto power in the Security Council, to remove the category of permanent membership of it, and to increase the number of states with membership. |
|
9.3. |
Support the International Criminal Court. In war crimes, sexualised violence such as mass rape should be regarded as a war crime, as should environmental crimes in times of conflict. |
|
9.4. |
Seek to curtail the power of the military-industrial-financial complex in order to radically reduce the trade in armaments, ensure transparency of manufacturing and remove hidden subsidies that benefit the military industries. |
|
9.5. |
Will work to regulate and reduce, with the long term aim of eliminating, the international arms trade (including banning nuclear, biological and chemical arms, depleted uranium weapons and anti-personnel mines) and bring it within the ambit of the UN. |
|
9.6. |
Will help strengthen existing peace programmes and forge new programmes that address all aspects of building a culture of peace. Programmes will include analysis of the roots of violence, including inter-familial violence, and the issue of mutual respect between genders; and support training in non-violent conflict resolution at all levels. |
|
9.7. |
Will seek to amend the international rules of military engagement to ensure that natural resources are adequately protected in conflicts. |
|
9.8. |
Will fight against any National Missile Defence Project, and work towards the demilitarisation and de-nuclearisation of space. |
10. Acting globally
|
10.0. |
The Global Greens are independent organisations from diverse cultures and backgrounds who share a common purpose and recognise that, to achieve it, we must act globally as well as locally. |
The Greens -
|
10.1. |
Will work cooperatively to implement the Global Greens Charter by taking action together on issues of global consequence whenever needed. |
|
10.2. |
Will support the development of Green parties, political movements and youth networks around the world. |
|
10.3. |
Will assist, at their request, other Green parties and movements including by
|
|
10.4. |
Will adopt and put into practice in our own organisations the democratic principles we seek in broader society. |
|
10.5. |
Will act as a model of participatory democracy in our own internal organisation at all levels. |
|
10.6. |
Will encourage cooperation between the global Green parties to ensure that member parties are consulted, educated and have equal capacity to influence global positions of the Greens. |
|
10.7. |
Will encourage Green parties and green political movements to show leadership in establishing policies guaranteeing transparent and decentralised structures, so that political power and opportunity is extended to all members; and in developing new political models which better meet the challenges of sustainable development and grassroots democracy. |
|
10.8. |
Will avoid sources of finance that conflict with our vision and values. |
|
10.9. |
Will avoid cooperation with dictatorships, sects, or criminal organisations and with their dependent organisations, particularly in matters of democracy and human rights. |
|
10.10. |
Will strengthen our links with like-minded community organisations, and with civil society organisations; we are one part, with them, of the growing consciousness that respect for the environment, for social and human rights, and for democracy, has to prevail on the economic organisation of the world. |
|
10.11. |
Will support each other personally and politically with friendship, optimism and good humour, and not forget to enjoy ourselves in the process! |