Tax treatment of losses in cross-border situations

This Communication deals with the coordination of Member States' tax systems as regards cross-border relief for losses sustained by businesses. The Commission is proposing a coordinated approach by Member States that would result in a minimum standard for relief for cross-border losses sustained by companies and groups of companies.

ACT

Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee of 19 December 2006 - Tax Treatment of Losses in Cross-Border Situations [COM(2006) 824 - Not published in the Official Journal].

SUMMARY

This Communication, which forms part of a coordinated approach to Member States' direct tax systems, focuses on the coordination of Member States' tax systems as regards cross-border relief for losses sustained by businesses.

In most Member States, relief for domestic losses can come from other profits realised in the same Member State. However, there is generally no provision for such relief as regards losses sustained in other Member States. In the absence of cross-border loss relief, the profits and losses of companies and groups of companies may be placed under different jurisdictions. As a result, relief for losses sustained by companies and groups is limited to the profits realised in the Member State in which the investment was made, meaning that companies and groups may have to pay tax on an amount in excess of their real results at EU level.

This shortcoming in Member States' legislation constitutes a barrier to accessing other markets and therefore has a negative impact on the international competitiveness of European businesses.

Objectives

The Commission is planning to propose a coordinated approach by Member States that would result in a minimum standard for cross-border loss relief. This Communication proposes methods for providing cross-border relief for losses sustained:

Losses sustained within a company

Relief for losses resulting from domestic operations within a single company is automatically granted in all Member States. However, once a company sets up operations in another Member State via a permanent establishment, the taking into account at company head office level of any potential losses sustained by the permanent establishment depends mainly on the method chosen to avoid double taxation in the double taxation agreements concluded between the Member States in question.

The credit method (applied by 12 of the 27 Member States) is characterised by the taking into account of all losses when establishing the worldwide income in the company's home State.

The exemption method excludes foreign income taxed in the source country from the tax base of the head office:

The Commission strongly encourages those Member States that do not permit the taking into account of losses sustained by permanent establishments in other Member States to review their tax systems in order to promote the freedom of establishment provided for by the EC Treaty.

Losses within a group of companies at domestic level

Since losses are not automatically taken into account within a group of companies in purely domestic situations, 19 Member States have a domestic group taxation scheme in order to treat them as a single economic unit. However, there are eight Member States where there is no such provision.

On the domestic level, there are three different group taxation schemes:

Cross-border loss relief within a group of companies

Of the 19 Member States with a domestic system, only four apply a system that allows for cross-border losses to be taken into account.

In the "Marks & Spencer" case, the European Court of Justice was called on to give a judgment on the question of the taking into account of losses sustained by a subsidiary established in another Member State.

The Commission describes three possible options for ensuring a minimum level of cross-border loss relief. However, in practice, only the second and third options seem more likely to be retained:

The Commission's conclusions

The Commission calls upon the Member States to:

See also

Further information is available on the European Commission Taxation and Customs Union DG website.

Last updated: 06.06.2007