These guidelines are designed to help companies determine on a case-by-case basis whether their cooperation agreements are compatible with the competition rules by providing a framework for assessment under Articles 101 (1) and (3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) (see summary).
Cooperation is of a ‘horizontal nature’ if an agreement or concerted practice is entered into between actual or potential competitors. These guidelines also cover horizontal cooperation agreements between non-competitors, for example between two companies that are active in the same product markets but in different geographical markets without being potential competitors.
Often, horizontal cooperation can lead to substantial economic benefits where it is a means of sharing risk, making cost savings, increasing investments, pooling know-how, enhancing product quality and variety and launching innovation faster. However, horizontal cooperation can lead to competition problems where it causes negative market effects with respect to prices, output, innovation or the variety and quality of products.
These guidelines provide an analytical framework for the most common types of horizontal cooperation agreements with a view to determining their compatibility with Article 101 TFEU.
They only apply to the most common types of cooperation:
Agreements that are entered into between companies at a different level of the production or distribution chain (vertical agreements) are, in principle, dealt with in Regulation (EU) No 330/2010, the ‘block exemption regulation’ on vertical restraints (see summary), and the guidelines on vertical restraints (see summary). However, to the extent that vertical agreements are concluded between competitors, they must be assessed according to the principles applicable to horizontal agreements. Where horizontal agreements result in a concentration, Regulation (EC) No 139/2004, the ‘merger regulation’, applies (see summary).
The guidelines set out the criteria for assessing the application of the competition rules under Article 101 TFEU:
Assessment criteria under Article 101(1) TFEU
Article 101(1) TFEU prohibits agreements that have as their object or effect the restriction of competition. For the purposes of these guidelines, ‘restriction of competition’ includes the prevention and distortion of competition. If an agreement has the object to restrict competition, that is to say that by its very nature it has the potential to restrict competition under Article 101(1) TFEU, then it is not necessary to examine the actual or potential effects of the agreement.
If, however, a horizontal cooperation agreement does not restrict competition by object, actual and potential effects must be analysed to determine whether there are appreciable restrictive effects on competition.
For there to be restrictive effects on competition under Article 101(1) TFEU, the agreement must have, or be likely to have, an appreciable adverse impact on at least one of the parameters of competition on the market, such as price, output, product quality and variety, or innovation. Such an assessment of restrictive effects must be made in relation to the actual legal and economic context in which competition would occur in the absence of the agreement.
The nature of an agreement relates to factors such as the area and objective of cooperation, the competitive relationship between the parties and the extent to which they combine their activities. These factors determine which kinds of possible competition concerns can arise.
Horizontal cooperation agreements may limit competition in several ways. For example, production agreements may give rise to a direct limitation of competition where the parties reduce output. The main competition concern pertaining to commercialisation agreements is price fixing.
Market power is the ability to profitably maintain prices above competitive levels for a period of time or to profitably maintain output in terms of product quantity, quality and variety, or innovation below competitive levels for a period of time. Market power can sometimes result from reduced competition between parties.
The starting point for the analysis of market power is the position of the parties in the markets affected by the cooperation. To carry out this analysis, the relevant market(s) have to be defined, using the Commission’s notice on the definition of the relevant market (see summary), and the parties’ combined market share has to be calculated. If the combined market share is low, horizontal cooperation is unlikely to produce restrictive effects. Given the variety of cooperation agreements and the different effects they may cause in different market situations, it is impossible to indicate a general market share threshold above which sufficient market power for causing restrictive effects can be assumed.
Depending on the market position of the parties and the concentration in the market, other factors should be considered, such as:
Assessment criteria under Article 101(3) TFEU
Where a restriction of competition under Article 101(1) has been proven, Article 101(3) can be invoked as a defence. Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (see summary) puts the burden of proof on the undertaking invoking the benefit of this provision. There are four cumulative conditions that must be met for cooperation agreements to be exempted:
Where these four criteria are met, the efficiency gains generated by an agreement can be considered to offset the restrictions of competition generated by it.
Information exchange
The guidelines provide general principles on the competitive assessment of information exchange, including the assessment under Articles 101(1) and 101(3) TFEU, which are applicable to all types of horizontal cooperation agreements that include the exchange of information.
Information exchange takes various forms, such as data shared directly between competitors, data shared indirectly through a common agency or a third party, or data shared through the companies’ suppliers or retailers. Information exchange can be beneficial for companies, for example by helping companies save costs by reducing their inventories, as well as directly for consumers, for example by reducing their search costs and improving choice. However, in certain situations it can also lead to restrictions of competition when it enables companies to be aware of their competitors’ market strategies. Communication of information among competitors may constitute an agreement, a concerted practice or a decision with the object of fixing prices or quantities. Such types of information exchange will normally be considered and fined as cartels.
Outside the area of cartels, information exchange is only considered to restrict competition by object where competitors exchange individualised information regarding intended future prices or quantities. Exchanges of all other types of information, including current prices, will not be treated as restrictions by object and will be assessed as to their restrictive effects on competition.
Types of cooperation agreement
The guidelines also define the characteristics of certain types of cooperation agreement and apply the assessment framework under Articles 101(1) and 101(3) TFEU described above to each of the following types of agreements:
They have applied since 14 January 2011.
For more information, see:
Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements (OJ C 11, 14.1.2011, pp. 1-72)
Corrigendum to Communication from the Commission, Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements (OJ C 33, 2.2.2011, p. 20)
Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Part Three — Union policies and internal actions — Title VII — Common rules on competition, taxation and approximation of laws — Chapter 1 — Rules on competition — Section 1 — Rules applying to undertakings — Article 101 (ex Article 81 TEC) (OJ C 202, 7.6.2016, pp. 88-89)
Commission notice — Guidelines on Vertical Restraints (SEC(2010) 411 final, 10.5.2010)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (OJ L 102, 23.4.2010, pp. 1-7)
Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, pp. 1-22)
Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, pp. 1-25)
Successive amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 have been incorporated into the original text. This consolidated version is of documentary value only.
Commission Notice on the definition of relevant market for the purposes of Community competition law (OJ C 372, 9.12.1997, pp. 5-13)
last update 03.12.2020