EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CB0608
Case C-608/15 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — Panasonic Corp. v MT Picture Display Co. Ltd, European Commission (Appeal — Rules of Procedure of the Court — Article 181 — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market-sharing, customer-allocation and output-limitation — Rights of the defence — Statement of objections — Content)
Case C-608/15 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — Panasonic Corp. v MT Picture Display Co. Ltd, European Commission (Appeal — Rules of Procedure of the Court — Article 181 — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market-sharing, customer-allocation and output-limitation — Rights of the defence — Statement of objections — Content)
Case C-608/15 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — Panasonic Corp. v MT Picture Display Co. Ltd, European Commission (Appeal — Rules of Procedure of the Court — Article 181 — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market-sharing, customer-allocation and output-limitation — Rights of the defence — Statement of objections — Content)
OJ C 343, 19.9.2016, p. 16–16
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
19.9.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 343/16 |
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — Panasonic Corp. v MT Picture Display Co. Ltd, European Commission
(Case C-608/15 P) (1)
((Appeal - Rules of Procedure of the Court - Article 181 - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors - Agreements and concerted practices on pricing, market-sharing, customer-allocation and output-limitation - Rights of the defence - Statement of objections - Content))
(2016/C 343/24)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Panasonic Corp. (represented by: R. Gerrits, advocaat, M. Hoskins QC, and M. Gray, Barrister)
Other parties to the proceedings: MT Picture Display Co. Ltd, European Commission (represented by: A. Biolan and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the order
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
2. |
Panasonic Corp. shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |