Help Print this page 
Title and reference
European small claims procedure

Summaries of EU legislation: direct access to the main summaries page.
Multilingual display

European small claims procedure

The European Union (EU) small claims procedure applies in cross-border litigation to civil and commercial matters for claims of under EUR 2 000. It has been available since 2009 in all EU countries, except Denmark, as an alternative to national procedures.


Regulation (EC) No 861/2007of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European small claims procedure.


The European Small Claims Procedure (ESCP) aims to simplify and speed up cross-border small claims litigation in civil and commercial matters and cut costs. The value of the claim (when it is received by the court) cannot exceed EUR 2 000. Judgments are recognised and enforceable in other EU countries without the need for a declaration of enforceability. An alternative to the options under Member States’ laws, the ESCP is optional.


The ESCP applies where at least one of the parties is domiciled or habitually resident in a Member State other than that of the court where the action is brought.

It does not apply to revenue, customs or administrative matters, to the liability of the state for exercising state authority (acta jure imperii) or for example to:

  • the status or legal capacity of natural persons,
  • family law issues,
  • bankruptcy,
  • social security,
  • arbitration,
  • employment law,
  • property tenancies, except for monetary claims,
  • violations of privacy and of rights relating to personality (e.g. defamation).


The ESCP, for which no lawyer is necessary, works as follows.

Filing the claim

The claim is filed directly with the competent court by means of a form (Form A - in the annexes of the regulation) giving details of the claim, sum demanded, etc. If the claim is inadmissible (see below), the court notifies the claimant; if the claim is not withdrawn, the court proceeds with it under the relevant procedural law in that country.

Correcting and/or completing the claim form

If the claimant has not provided enough information, a second form (Form B) is sent asking for the missing information by a deadline. The claim is rejected if the claimant is late, or if it is clearly unfounded or inadmissible.

Notifying the defendant

Having received the completed claim, the court prepares a standard response form (Form C), sent to the defendant within 14 days, together with a copy of the claim and any supporting documents. This must be served by post with dated acknowledgement of receipt; if this is impossible, other methods of service may be used.

Defendant’s response

The defendant has 30 days from the date of service of the answer form to respond. Within 14 days of receiving this response, the court forwards a copy to the claimant, with any relevant supporting documents.

Any counterclaim by the defendant (using Form A) is served on the claimant who has 30 days to respond. If the counterclaim exceeds EUR 2 000, both the main claim and counterclaim are dealt with in accordance with the law applicable in the country in which the action is taken.

Decision and deadlines

The court must give judgment within 30 days of receipt of the response from the defendant (or claimant, if there is a counterclaim). It may ask for further information to be provided within 30 days and/or take evidence or summon the parties to a hearing (see below), also to be held within 30 days of the summons. In these cases, the court still gives its judgment within 30 days, but from the time of receiving the information required or holding the hearing.

If the parties do not reply in time, the court still gives its judgment. The judgment cannot be reviewed as to the substance in the Member State of enforcement. The court may issue a certificate of judgment (without further cost), using Form D, at the request of a party.


A hearing is held only if necessary or if requested by one of the parties. The request may be refused if it is clearly unnecessary for the fair conduct of the proceedings. The hearing may be via videoconference or similar technology.

Taking evidence

The court determines the extent of the evidence needed for its judgment and the means of taking it, using the simplest and least onerous method.

Enforcement of the judgment

Governed by the law of the country in which the judgment is enforced, the party seeking enforcement produces an original copy of the judgment and of the certificate (Form D) translated into the language of the country of enforcement. No security, bond or deposit on the grounds that the claimant is a foreign national or is not domiciled or resident in the Member State of enforcement can be required. The claimant does not need an authorised representative or an address in the country of enforcement, other than that of agents competent to carry out the enforcement procedure.

Refusal of enforcement

The court in the country of enforcement can, on the defendant’s request, refuse to enforce the judgment when:

  • it is irreconcilable with an earlier judgment between the same parties in the same matter;
  • the earlier judgment was given in the Member State of enforcement or fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition there; and
  • this irreconcilability was not, and could not have been, raised as an objection during proceedings where the ESCP judgment was given.

When a party challenges an ESCP judgment, the country of enforcement can limit enforcement to protective measures, make it conditional on some security, or, in some cases, stay the enforcement proceedings.


Appeal against a judgment is possible if it is provided for under the law of the country of the court seized.


The defendant can apply to the competent court where the judgment was issued for a review when:

  • the claim form or summons to a hearing was served by a method without proof of receipt by the defendant personally and service was not effected in time for a defence to be prepared, without any fault on the defendant’s part; or
  • the defendant was prevented from objecting to the claim by reasons of force majeure, without any fault on their part.

In these cases, the defendant is expected to act promptly. When a review is justified, the original judgment becomes null and void.

The court does not require the parties to make any legal assessment of the claim. If necessary, it informs the parties about procedural questions and, where appropriate, it seeks to reach a settlement between them.

Languages and translations

The claim must be submitted in the language of the court, as must the response, any counterclaim, the description of supporting documents, essential documents, etc.


The unsuccessful party pays the costs of the proceedings. The court will not award costs to the winning party if they were unnecessarily incurred or disproportionate to the claim.



Entry into force - Date of expiry

Deadline for transposition in the Member States

Official Journal

Regulation (EC) No 861/2007

1.8.2007. Applicable from 1.1.2009 (Art 25: 1.1.2008)


OJ L 199 of 31.7.2007

Last updated: 23.03.2014