EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CN0356

Case C-356/15: Action brought on 13 July 2015 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

OJ C 302, 14.9.2015, p. 25–25 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

14.9.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/25


Action brought on 13 July 2015 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-356/15)

(2015/C 302/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin, acting as Agent)

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

Form of order sought

Declare that by adopting Articles 23 and 24 of the programme law of 27 December 2012, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 11, 12 and 76(6) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Decision Al of the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems (3).

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

With the adoption of Articles 23 and 24 of the programme law of 27 December 2012, the Commission considers that the Kingdom of Belgium has infringed Articles 11, 12 and 76 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, and Decision Al of the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems by failing to recognise the binding nature of a document issued by the Member State of origin of a posted worker attesting that he is subject to the social security legislation of that Member State.


(1)  OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2009 L 284, p. 1.

(3)  OJ C 106 of 24.4.2010, p. 1.


Top