This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TB0505
Case T-505/14: Order of the General Court of 23 February 2015 — Seven for all mankind v OHIM — Seven (SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND — Earlier Community and international figurative marks Seven — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-505/14: Order of the General Court of 23 February 2015 — Seven for all mankind v OHIM — Seven (SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND — Earlier Community and international figurative marks Seven — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-505/14: Order of the General Court of 23 February 2015 — Seven for all mankind v OHIM — Seven (SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND — Earlier Community and international figurative marks Seven — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 127, 20.4.2015, pp. 26–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.4.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 127/26 |
Order of the General Court of 23 February 2015 — Seven for all mankind v OHIM — Seven (SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND)
(Case T-505/14) (1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND - Earlier Community and international figurative marks Seven - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2015/C 127/36)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Seven for all mankind LLC (Vernon, California, United States) (represented by: A. Gautier-Sauvagnac, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy) (represented by: L. Trevisan, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 April 2014 (Case R 1277/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Seven SpA and Seven For All Mankind LLC.
Operative part of the order
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Seven For All Mankind LLC to pay the costs. |