Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TN0714

Case T-714/13: Action brought on 23 December 2013 — Gold Crest v OHIM (MIGHTY BRIGHT)

OJ C 61, 1.3.2014, pp. 17–18 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

1.3.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/17


Action brought on 23 December 2013 — Gold Crest v OHIM (MIGHTY BRIGHT)

(Case T-714/13)

2014/C 61/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Gold Crest LLC (Santa Barbara, United States) (represented by: P. Rath and W. Festl-Wietek, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 October 2013 given in Case R 2038/2012-2;

Declare the Community trade mark applied for eligible for registration;

Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘MIGHTY BRIGHT’ for goods and services in Class 11 — Community trade mark application No 10 853 141

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 65(2) CTMR.


Top