This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TO0713
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 September 2018.
Motex Ipari és Szolgáltató Rehabilitációs Kft. (Motex Kft.) v European Commission.
Action for annulment — State Aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings which have employed persons with disabilities — Preliminary review procedure — Decisions allegedly taken by the Commission declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market — Concept of party concerned — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility.
Case T-713/17.
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 September 2018.
Motex Ipari és Szolgáltató Rehabilitációs Kft. (Motex Kft.) v European Commission.
Action for annulment — State Aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings which have employed persons with disabilities — Preliminary review procedure — Decisions allegedly taken by the Commission declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market — Concept of party concerned — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility.
Case T-713/17.
Court reports – general
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 September 2018 –
Motex v Commission
(Case T‑713/17)
(Action for annulment — State Aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings which have employed persons with disabilities — Preliminary review procedure — Decisions allegedly taken by the Commission declaring the aid to be compatible with the internal market — Concept of party concerned — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
|
1. |
Actions for annulment — Time-limits — Point from which time starts to run — Day on which a measure came to the knowledge of the applicant — Decision neither published nor notified to the applicant (Art. 263, sixth para., TFEU) (see para. 14) |
|
2. |
Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Individual concern — Criteria (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see para. 17) |
|
3. |
Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Commission decision declaring State aid to be compatible with the common market without initiating the formal investigation procedure — Action by interested parties within the meaning of Article 108(2) TFEU — Admissibility — Conditions (Arts 108(2) TFEU and 263, fourth para., TFEU; Council Regulation 2015/1589, Art. 1(h)) (see paras 20, 21, 23-26) |
|
4. |
Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Summary of the pleas in law and arguments relied on — Pleas in law and arguments not set out in the application — Pleas in law and arguments not set out in the application — Reference to elements in an annex — Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 76(d)) (see paras 22, 28, 29) |
Re:
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decisions allegedly adopted by the Commission concerning the complaints SA.29432 — CP 290/2009 — Hungary — Aid for the employment of disabled workers that is alleged to be illegal due to the discriminatory nature of the legislation, and SA.45498 (FC/2016) — Complaint by OPS Újpest-lift Kft concerning State aid provided to undertakings which employed disabled workers between 2006 and 2012.
Operative part
|
1. |
The action is dimissed. |
|
2. |
Motex Ipari és Szolgáltató Rehabilitációs Kft. (Motex Kft.) shall pay the costs. |